Skip to content Skip to navigation

An Alternative Approach to 24/7 ICU Coverage

June 21, 2012
by John DeGaspari
| Reprints
Can tele-ICU monitoring fill the intensivist shortage?
Click To View Gallery

For High Point (N.C.) Regional Hospital, telemedicine has helped to fill a gap in staffing its intensive care unit, while helping the provider to significantly reduce its mortality rate as well as the lengths of stay for its patients. 

Like many hospitals, High Point Regional has struggled with a persistent and long-standing staffing problem: a shortage of intensivists to man their ICUs. A report released in 2006 by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Resources and Services Administration projected that by 2020 there will be a 35-percent shortage of intensivists by 2020, partly resulting from an aging population that is more likely to use hospital ICUs. 

Greg Taylor, M.D., High Point Regional Medical Center’s chief operating officer, describes the hospital’s decision to move to tele-monitoring of its ICU as an eight-year journey, the beginning of which coincided with his arrival there as the organization’s first chief medical officer. “When I arrived, one of the first things the CEO asked me to do was to look at the length of stay and outcomes in our ICUs,” he says, adding that the hospital was an outlier on the negative side on both measures. 

The challenge was to begin to benchmark the hospital against state-of-the-art critical care medicine. That was in 2004, at a time when the critical care unit was essentially run by two pulmonologists, who shortly after moved on from the facility. With their departure, Taylor says the hospital saw a need to recruit an intensivist to run the ICU, rather than depend on physicians dividing their time between practicing their specialty and critical care medicine. It did succeed in hiring an intensivist, who left shortly after; and then hired a replacement intensivist, Peter Brath, M.D., who is medical director of High Point Regional’s intensive care unit and respiratory therapy. 

Yet even with a full-time intensivist on board, the hospital faced significant staffing costs, relying on locum tenens physicians, at considerable expense. The hospital spent $2 million in the 2007-2008 fiscal year on ICU labor costs of the intensivist and ancillary clinicians to provide 24/7 ICU coverage, he says. 

A Search for a Partner

That proved to be a watershed moment, which prompted the hospital to look for an alternative, and more affordable, ICU staffing model. The hospital considered two possibilities. One was to collaborate with a neighboring hospital in Greensboro, N.C., which had installed an electronic ICU monitoring system. The hospital had enough beds in its ICU to justify it, but was interested in covering High Point Regional’s ICU beds as well, to help defray its investment costs, Taylor explains. The other was a tele-ICU service provider (supplied by Advanced ICU Care, St. Louis, Mo.). 

In making the decision, Taylor said that hardware and software costs were identical, whether from the neighboring hospital’s ICU or the service provider. The deciding factor was coverage: 12 hours per day from the neighboring hospital’s ICU versus 24 hours a day by the third-party service provider. “We realized that we had an intensivist on site, but he was just one person, and we understand that other emergencies come up, and vacations and illnesses,” he says. 

Nonetheless, a major concern of either option was interoperability, Taylor says. High Point Regional uses Alpharetta, Ga.-based McKesson Technology Solutions as its primary IT vendor, which provides solutions for nursing documentation and pharmacy orders and physician orders. Taylor says a major concern was compatibility issues between the hospital’s McKesson solutions and the hardware and software for the remote monitoring of the ICU (supplied by VISICU, Inc., Baltimore, Md.). He notes that Advanced ICU (which maintains it is vendor neutral) had prior experience with both of those systems. This was an important factor in the final decision to sign on with the tele-ICU service provider, Taylor says. 

Smooth Implementation

In August 2008 High Point Regional negotiated a contract, which it signed toward the end of the year. Go-live was scheduled for July 1, 2009. The vendor arrived at the hospital in April with a technology team, an operations team, and a clinical team to begin implementation. The hospital supplied counterpart teams from its own staff. 

Taylor says the implementation went smoothly. “They basically came in with a roadmap for implementation, and they led us through it. They told us up front what we were going to need and what we needed to do,” Taylor says. When connectivity issues arose, both the vendor team and its hospital counterpart teams worked through theproblems, consulting with McKesson when necessary, Taylor says. He adds that the vendor’s prior experience working with McKesson was a big advantage, because it removed potential roadblocks during the implementation process. 

The clinical teams were focused on uploading the hospital’s clinical protocols.”Dr. Brath had been here long enough so he had several protocols,” Taylor says. “It’s not [a case of] us adapting to Advanced ICU’s protocols; it was quite the reverse. Advanced ICU adapted to our protocols. By July 1, when we went live and the night staff was calling Advanced ICU, they knew exactly what our weaning protocols were, what our ventilator protocols were,” he says. 

Night and Day

Even an on-site intensivist can’t be available 24 hours a day, and Taylor says the tele-ICU monitoring system works well to fill in the gaps.