Healthcare organizations have one overarching fear when it comes to outsourcing: high costs. And no wonder. While many healthcare companies generally deal with a fixed-cost structure, outsourcing agreements have earned reputations for escalating costs over time.
Inadequate planning, poorly structured contracts and a lack of outsourcing relationship management often contribute to increasing costs, but can be avoided with proper guidance and practices. By keeping an open mind, healthcare companies can implement successful sourcing strategies.
Factors influencing perception
When establishing an outsourcing relationship with a vendor, pricing established on incomplete data may lead a company to feel misled when the bills based on actual usage and transaction volumes start to materialize. To develop a complete picture of IT costs for comparison with outsource vendor proposals, it is important to prepare a comprehensive internal cost model.
An organization's grasp of its own internal costs heavily influences the perception that outsourcing comes with high prices.
Many companies have an inaccurate or incomplete view of IT spending because of factors such as IT service cost centers distributed throughout the enterprise, potential ongoing support costs associated with current and planned projects, and costs within the business units that will be impacted by outsourcing.
When considering outsourcing options, many companies don't accurately measure ancillary costs such as facilities, benefits, IT growth and employee turnover. Without procedures to track these costs, companies can't adequately predict or incorporate these expenses. When looking at the total cost of providing services in-house, a company assumes the risks of under- or over-investment in technology, staff skill development, tools and processes. When outsourced, the vendor assumes these risks and builds them into its price.
Getting the right alignment
Vendor pricing structure is a key factor in high-cost perception. Companies frequently have difficulty matching their internal budgetary cost view with vendors' unit-based cost breakdown. In stark contrast to a general budgetary view, which consolidates IT costs in budget categories, an outsourcing cost structure clearly defines a resource unit — such as server, PC or network equipment component — and ties an associated unit cost to each. Tracking resource unit costs internally to this level of detail is complex and rarely done.
Relationship management — IT governance
How IT governs an outsourced relationship also affects costs. It is important for IT management to have a strong relationship based on business knowledge when building ties between the outsourcer and the business areas being supported. Often, the resources and effort required to manage an outsourcer are initially underestimated as the team minimizes the client governance required in an effort to make the financial business case look attractive.
In reality, the nature of IT management changes from a technical orientation to a relationship development and business-management function. The IT department must still retain responsibility for technical architecture oversight, IT policy and work management.
Comparing an outsourcing contract's baseline cost with the cost a company incurs internally to do business raises a challenge. If a company doesn't conduct due diligence prior to signing an agreement with a vendor, the contract will likely be out of alignment, with potentially significant gaps or higher support requirements than initially identified in the RFP (request for proposal) process.
Increased costs may result when new equipment, software or supported users are discovered during the transition phase of an agreement. It is important for a company to have a solid understanding of what assets it expects to have supported and the supported user population in order to properly align internal costs to those of the vendor.
A contract for success
Outsourcing agreements that take a pure procurement approach and focus solely on lowering service costs almost always fail. Overemphasizing cost — and negotiating away the service provider's profit margin in the process — ultimately hurts the bottom line. It gives the service provider a disincentive to invest in the deal. Instead, they will be financially constrained to operate at the minimum service level until the company becomes dissatisfied and negotiates a change.
By maintaining a positive attitude during price negotiations, companies build a vendor's willingness to invest in their service offerings. This ultimately adds value, particularly when the outsourcer can improve application availability, user community support and risk management. Being specific about the added value each party anticipates helps to launch a positive and clear relationship. Understanding not only the cost of transitioning operations, but also transformation of services, must be achieved during the evaluation phase.
Preparatory financial analysis — the base case
Base case. A base case is a comprehensive internal financial picture of the IT function used to compare the pricing proposed by the potential vendors. Putting adequate focus on the completeness and accuracy of the base case is critical to a successful outsourcing evaluation.