Proposed Medicare Cuts Could Slow IT Investments

Proposed Medicare physician payment cuts of approximately 5.1 percent (which, at press time, were still being debated) could slow IT adoption, said former Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Thomas Scully at the Medical Group Management Association conference in Las Vegas. "This is the number one issue facing Congress as it comes back, but I don't think they will get it done," he said, referring to Congress' ability to roll back the cuts before the take-effect date of Jan. 1.
Scully, who held the position of CMS administrator from 2001 to 2003, sang the praises of CMS' desire to move toward a pay-for-performance-oriented system, rather than one that reimburses based on volume.
"We must get rid of price fixing where everyone gets paid the same thing whether they are the best or the worst doctor," he said. "Price fixing has never worked in the history of the world."
He also spoke in favor of CMS' move to transfer some of its beneficiaries from the traditional Medicare plan to privatized plans like Medicare Advantage. "Private payers will do a better job because it will be their money that is at risk" he said. "To be honest, my old employees (at CMS) don't care whether they pay out $330 million or $350 million (in claims), they go home at 5 p.m."
MGMA SESSION HIGHLIGHT: EMR Tech Adoption

Scott Johnson, MBA, administrator, Digestive Disease Associates, Gainesville, Fla.
10 physicians
Vendor: A4 Health Systems, Cary, N.C. (now part of AllScripts, Chicago)
Implementation Start: August 2002
Live: November 2002
Results:
-
faster chart access (no chart pulls)
-
electronic messaging between patient/staff, staff/physician
-
Reduced staff by five people over four years (attrition)
-
63 percent reduction in transcription costs
-
physicians gained 60-90 minutes per day in the office
-
legible prescriptions
Lessons Learned:
-
don't expect to reduce staff in the first 12-18 months
-
be ready to establish implementation incentives
-
reduce RFP to three vendors
-
ask vendors to do site visits
-
put positive people in charge
-
commit the proper resources

Pete Donaldson, MBA, administrator, Digestive Health Specialists PA, Winston Salem, N.C.
6 physicians
Vendor: gMed, Weston, Fla.
Implementation Start: November 2002
Live: January 2003
Results:
-
faster chart access (no chart pulls)
-
faxes quick and accurate
-
handwriting confusion gone
-
billing processing is faster
-
electronic backup for data
-
less hold time for patients
-
able to conduct 40 percent more business with no additional staff
Lessons Learned:
-
must have an EHR champion
-
need an emergency backup plan
-
the volume of to-do messages that can build up in physicians' inboxes can be psychologically difficult to deal with
-
implementation was a struggle but system proved to be a "huge, huge" benefit to staff

Kathy Sammis, administrator, Charlotte (N.C.) Gastroenterology & Hepatology PLLC, and president of MGMA GAA
17 physicians in five regional offices (3-5 physicians in each)
Vendor: NextGen, Horsham, Pa.
Implementation Start: July 2004
Live: December 2005 (began bringing up one office at a time)
Results:
-
financial savings from reduction in storage space (now used for clinical needs)
-
immediate access to patient's chart
-
easy to track labs, nurse calls and scheduling
Lessons Learned:
-
spend ample time working with physicians
-
administrator must act as a translator for IT staff/physician communication
-
bring one site at a time live on the system
-
transition can be a painful one for the physicians (changing habits), office staff is quick to embrace
-
allow customization only after everyone is familiar with the core system
-
realize that version seen during vendor demo is full of bells and whistles which require time-consuming customization to enact
-
build in costs for scanning in old files, which can be expensive and time consuming
All In
- Show full page
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version




