Skip to content Skip to navigation

MGMA Talks Shop

January 1, 2007
by Anthony Guerra
| Reprints
The annual MGMA conference covered everything from cuts in Medicare's physician reimbursements to the adoption of EHRs.

Proposed Medicare Cuts Could Slow IT Investments

Thomas scully

Proposed Medicare physician payment cuts of approximately 5.1 percent (which, at press time, were still being debated) could slow IT adoption, said former Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Thomas Scully at the Medical Group Management Association conference in Las Vegas. "This is the number one issue facing Congress as it comes back, but I don't think they will get it done," he said, referring to Congress' ability to roll back the cuts before the take-effect date of Jan. 1.

Scully, who held the position of CMS administrator from 2001 to 2003, sang the praises of CMS' desire to move toward a pay-for-performance-oriented system, rather than one that reimburses based on volume.

"We must get rid of price fixing where everyone gets paid the same thing whether they are the best or the worst doctor," he said. "Price fixing has never worked in the history of the world."

He also spoke in favor of CMS' move to transfer some of its beneficiaries from the traditional Medicare plan to privatized plans like Medicare Advantage. "Private payers will do a better job because it will be their money that is at risk" he said. "To be honest, my old employees (at CMS) don't care whether they pay out $330 million or $350 million (in claims), they go home at 5 p.m."


Scott johnson

Scott Johnson, MBA, administrator, Digestive Disease Associates, Gainesville, Fla.

10 physicians

Vendor: A4 Health Systems, Cary, N.C. (now part of AllScripts, Chicago)

Implementation Start: August 2002

Live: November 2002


  • faster chart access (no chart pulls)

  • electronic messaging between patient/staff, staff/physician

  • Reduced staff by five people over four years (attrition)

  • 63 percent reduction in transcription costs

  • physicians gained 60-90 minutes per day in the office

  • legible prescriptions

Lessons Learned:

  • don't expect to reduce staff in the first 12-18 months

  • be ready to establish implementation incentives

  • reduce RFP to three vendors

  • ask vendors to do site visits

  • put positive people in charge

  • commit the proper resources

Pete donaldson

Pete Donaldson, MBA, administrator, Digestive Health Specialists PA, Winston Salem, N.C.

6 physicians

Vendor: gMed, Weston, Fla.

Implementation Start: November 2002

Live: January 2003


  • faster chart access (no chart pulls)

  • faxes quick and accurate

  • handwriting confusion gone

  • billing processing is faster

  • electronic backup for data

  • less hold time for patients

  • able to conduct 40 percent more business with no additional staff

Lessons Learned:

  • must have an EHR champion

  • need an emergency backup plan

  • the volume of to-do messages that can build up in physicians' inboxes can be psychologically difficult to deal with

  • implementation was a struggle but system proved to be a "huge, huge" benefit to staff

Kathy sammis

Kathy Sammis, administrator, Charlotte (N.C.) Gastroenterology & Hepatology PLLC, and president of MGMA GAA

17 physicians in five regional offices (3-5 physicians in each)

Vendor: NextGen, Horsham, Pa.

Implementation Start: July 2004

Live: December 2005 (began bringing up one office at a time)


  • financial savings from reduction in storage space (now used for clinical needs)

  • immediate access to patient's chart

  • easy to track labs, nurse calls and scheduling

    Lessons Learned:

  • spend ample time working with physicians

  • administrator must act as a translator for IT staff/physician communication

  • bring one site at a time live on the system

  • transition can be a painful one for the physicians (changing habits), office staff is quick to embrace

  • allow customization only after everyone is familiar with the core system

  • realize that version seen during vendor demo is full of bells and whistles which require time-consuming customization to enact

  • build in costs for scanning in old files, which can be expensive and time consuming

All In