Best HITECH Strategy? Rush In or Watch & Wait

April 20, 2009
7 Comments

How did we get into this economic mess? The partial answer is people borrowed money on terms they did not comprehend, or terms that were not fully disclosed. Then a couple of years later one fundamental rule changed — housing values, it appears, can go up and down, and yes Virginia, you can lose big money in real estate.

So now hospitals under the new American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) are being given the same wonderful opportunity. Borrow money from your rich (but debt ridden) Uncle to buy a shinny new EMR and agree that he can define the interest and repayment terms when he gets around to it. The recent HIMSS conference was replete with sessions telling you; Get the money now, buy a system soon, you don’t want to get hit with a penalty in 2015, and make sure you get your piece of the pie.

So like lemmings to the ledge we run.


When the rest of the world is yelling at you to jump with the lemmings, why wait?

There are at least three big reasons.

1) When was the last time you saw ‘on time’ regulation?

I have worked the healthcare industry for 35 years and cannot remember one major piece of legislation that met its original target dates. I lived through TEFRA, DRGs, HIPPA, UB-82, ICD10 and dozens of others. Not one made the original and, in many cases, second target dates. Amtrak has a better on-time schedule. What makes us think ARRA will be any different? I’ll bet my reputation that all the dates get pushed out, probably by years.

2) Meaningful what?

Nobody knows and the committee will decide. So what happens after you sign on the dotted line and two years later you learn the system cannot support all the meaningful use measures the committee came up with? I know what you’re thinking. Sue the ### vendor!

But that assumes the vendor allowed a clause in the contract warranting performance for all ‘meaningful use criteria.’ And that clause will no doubt go on for pages, since there could be cases where the system has the tools to support meaningful use, but it doesn’t fit with your workflow, and staff is not willing to deploy it.

Under Sarbanes Oxley, vendors that are public companies cannot book any revenues on contracts with open-ended contingencies. Getting a vendor to sign on that dotted line will be a super major task. Private companies like Epic and Meditech don’t have to worry about quarterly revenue pressure so they may be more willing. But still they could be taking on significant product liabilities. This one will be a big revenue generator for the lawyers.

3) The feds giveth, and the feds taketh away, or there is no such thing as a free lunch.

Page
of 2Next

Comments

Frank,
I'm following you on the penalty side. I'm also following you on the 'unclear' criteria and dates that historically don't stick. I don't see where you're factoring in the incentive payments to hospitals. Please help.
J

Frank. This is the most sensible take on how to approach the potential stimulus funds that I have seen. I wholeheartedly agree with your approach for caution and prudence.

Robert,
You have a good point that I did not address - the ongoing costs.
As for the last part of your comment re: real long term benefits, I also agree. But to get there will take big investments beyond what ARRA will cover and what with Obama saying he wants to cut health care payments sooner more than latter (and AHA agreeing) where's the investment money going to come from?

I'd like to throw in my small but meaning two cents versus your well spoken ideas. OUTCOMES! Using a proven, open source EMR based on VistA won't break the bank, will have meaningful use regardless of some committee's definition, and will go far in terms of patient safety and organizational communication. This isn't lemming behavior, this is visionary insight. Knowing the VA did it means small community hospitals can do it, too. Waiting means losing lives now and spending more money in the future.

Let me play Devil's advocate. I tend to agree with all that was posted so far, including Dr. Budman's suggested alternative. However, for some hospitals, clinics, and individual practices, none of this may make any financial sense at all. Here's why. It is estimated that it will cost in excess of twice any of the incentives to install and maintain these EHRs over to course of the incentive period, while the future costs are left to be borne by the using community. With that negative capital flow, the paucity of the actual penalties, the uncertainty of the actual incentives and support and how they will be determined and with the expected reductions in the Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement schedules as the costs of these plans are trimmed, who in their right mind would rush to do anything right now? Not very many as you all rightly suggest.

If, however, we leave the financial discussion to rise or fall of its own weight, and we begin a discussion of the role of an EHR in terms of patient care and patient safety, the calculus might just change enough so that any incentives may be welcomed and put to good use.

Thanks Frank. Your observations and conclusions seem valid. My experience with just the physician incentive programs of the last two years are consistent with your cautions.

Joe,
For a 250 bed hospital a rough calculation for the Medicare piece could come to about $2.4 million. But that assumes they met ALL meaningful use criteria (I call them MUCs).
Assuming they don't change the rule/formula/ amount latter on. Expect something like "Oh, we can't pay it all because of big budget deficits. Sorry."

So if your pretty sure you can meet all the MUCs...and I can't believe for a minute that more than 20% of the hospitals will considering the way Medicare doles out incentives (look at P4P), it could be positive. My take is if you are not well into implementing an EMR /CPOE by now it's a safer bet to play the waiting game, for the reasons noted earlier.

Again history tells us none of this will happen when they say it will. So be calm, and look before you leap.