An article this summer in the online publication MedPage Today alerted me to the fact that the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) had taken the formal position that pediatricians should take advantage of patient visits to advise their patients’ parents to encourage healthy eating in their children.
As the June 29 MedPage Today report by Jeff Minerd noted, “Pediatricians should advise families to replace the cookie jar with a fruit bowl and trade in soda for tap water or low-fat milk, according to new recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for preventing childhood obesity. The recommendations, published in the journal Pediatrics, lay out how pediatricians can be more proactive in helping families nip excess weight gain in the bud. ‘Because of the numerous medical and psychosocial complications of childhood obesity and the burden of pediatric obesity on current and future health care costs, this condition is now recognized as a public health priority by many groups and experts,’ wrote the authors, led by Stephen Daniels, MD, of the University of Colorado and chair of the AAP Committee on Nutrition.”
And the report quoted Dr. Daniels’ statement in AAP’s press release, in which he said, "Even when families have knowledge of healthy behaviors, they may need help from pediatricians to motivate them to implement behavior changes. Pediatricians can and should play an important role in obesity prevention because they are in a unique position to partner with families and patients and to influence key components of the broader strategy of developing community support.”
Among the recommendations from the AAP were the following: parents should entirely remove sugar-sweetened beverages such as soda and iced tea from their children’s diets, substituting them with water and low-fat milk, with sparkling water, unsweetened flavored waters, and artificially sweetened drinks used as transitional beverages; parents should replace high-calorie foods in their children’s diets with low-carliorie foods such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, low-fat dairy, lean meat and fish; they should encourage their children towards more physical activity, and less television and electronic game time; and so on.
Now, those recommendations are obviously nutritionally sound, and totally non-controversial. But what’s interesting to me about this development is several things. Let me unpack some of those elements here.
First, most physicians still aren’t getting much nutrition education in medical school, and those who do get nutrition education usually get it in the context of general pre-clinical education. According to an article published earlier this year in the Journal of Biomedical Education, researchers did a survey of medical school leaders and found, among other things, that “The responding medical schools reported that they provide on average 19.0 hours of nutrition education... Over a third of the responding medical schools reported requiring 12 or fewer hours of nutrition instruction; twelve of those institution, 9 percent, required none. Less than a third (35 of 121, 29 percent) of the responding medical schools reported that they provide at least 25 hours of nutrition education across the four-year curriculum. In terms of enrollment, this means that 24.6 percent of all medical students get the minimum of 25 hours, while 16.1 percent of all US medical students (those enrolled at 24 schools) get 30 hours or more. Eight of these schools reported that they provide between 40 and 75 hours of nutrition education.”
Significantly, the authors of the article—Kelly M. Adams, W. Scott Butsch, and Martin Kohlmeier—noted that “Most reported nutrition education takes place during preclinical training, adding up to an average of 14.3 (SD 10.5) hours of instruction. The instructional hours of nutrition education are lower during clinical training with an average number of 4.7 (SD 6.2) required hours. This number of hours does not include various electives, seminars with voluntary attendance, or student-organized activities.”
What’s more, these statistics reflect what’s happening only now in medical school education. The reality is that the vast, vast majority of practicing physicians in the U.S. who graduated from medical school more than 10 or 15 years ago likely received almost no education on nutrition, apart from what they learned as individuals, apart from their medical training. And allopathic medicine in the U.S. remains strongly biased against honoring disciplines that fall outside allopathic medicine.
But here’s the interesting part: with healthcare costs continuing to rise in the U.S., and with rates of chronic illness, including among children, absolutely exploding, these days, physicians are going to have to get involved in nutritional counseling, at a high level (and of course then turn their patients, and patients’ parents, in the case of pediatricians, over to professional nutritionists in their practices and hospitals), moving forward.