Skip to content Skip to navigation

AHIMA: EHRs Can Lead to Better Coding, More Accurate Reimbursement

May 3, 2013
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Electronic Health Records (EHRs), when used correctly, produce more accurate documentation leading to more complete coding, and ultimately, more accurate reimbursement claims, according to Sue Bowman, senior director of coding policy and compliance of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), during her presentation on May 3 at a listening session hosted by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The session, “Billing and Coding with Electronic Health Records,” convened stakeholders including providers, health association leaders, health information technology vendors and others to discuss EHRs, increased billing for some services, and appropriate coding in an increasingly electronic environment.

During her presentation on developing EHR coding standards, Bowman called for more research on the causes of higher levels of coding and reimbursement, according to a press release released by AHIMA.

“The extent to which EHRs have led to improper reimbursement is unclear,” Bowman said. “EHRs produce more complete and accurate documentation, and this could be leading medical providers to seek reimbursement for services they have always been providing, but weren’t properly documenting before. Higher levels of reimbursement do not necessarily equate to fraud.”

EHRs offer many benefits, including saving time, prompting clinicians for documentation, and improving consistency and completeness in medical records, said Bowman. On the other hand, they also have some features that can be risky if improperly used, like copy/paste, auto-creation of default documentation, and templates with limited options.

“If EHR systems are not properly designed and used, they can lead to inaccurate, outdated or misleading information,” said Bowman. “That’s why all EHR users should receive comprehensive training and education on how to use them correctly. Real improvements in documentation and coding should be rewarded, and misuse should be punished.”

To address the problems concerns about EHRs, AHIMA made several recommendations, including:

  • A code of ethics for both EHR vendors and users to design and use the systems correctly, and shared accountability for ensuring compliant documentation and coding practices
  • Organization guidelines to assure the features of an EHR are used correctly, addressing issues such as acceptable ways to capture information, limitations on certain features and correct copy/paste practices
  • A national set of coding guidelines by CMS for hospital reporting of emergency department and clinic visits
  • Education  and training on EHR use for all who access it


EHNAC and HITRUST Combine HIPAA Security Criteria, CSF Framework

The Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (EHNAC) and the Health Information Trust Alliance (HITRUST) announced plans to streamline their accreditation and certification programs.

Halamka on MACRA Final Rule: “CMS is Listening and I Thank Them”

Health IT notable expert John Halamka, M.D., CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, recently weighed in on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) final rule.

Texas Patient Care Clinic Hit with Ransomware Attack

Grand Prairie, Texas-based Rainbow Children's Clinic was the victim of a ransomware attack on its IT systems in August, affecting more than 33,000 patients, according to multiple news media reports this week.

Healthcare Organizations Again Go to Bat for AHRQ

Healthcare organizations are once again urging U.S. Senate and House leaders to protect the Department of Health and Human Services’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) from more budget cuts for 2017.

ONC Pilot Projects Focus on Using, Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data

Accenture Federal Services (AFS) has announced two pilot demonstrations with the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) to determine how patient-generated health data can be used by care teams and researchers.

Is it Unethical to Identify Patients as “Frequent Flyers” in Health IT Systems?

Several researchers from the University of Pennsylvania addressed the ethics of behavioral health IT as it relates to “frequent flyer” icons and the potential for implicit bias in an article published in JAMA.