Skip to content Skip to navigation

Survey: Most Docs Read Their Online Reviews

August 14, 2015
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Most physicians are embracing the notion that online reviews of healthcare professionals are here to stay, according to new research from online healthcare marketplace Vitals.

The survey found that now more than 80 percent of doctors monitor their reviews and ratings. However, it wasn’t long ago that doctors threatened—and even sued—patients who posted negative feedback online. Yet, those tactics couldn’t stop the popularity of reviews, which provided much needed transparency to the process of selecting a doctor.

Past Vitals Index studies have shown that reviews from patients largely focus on the patient experience, not a doctor’s medical acumen. Comments tend to address issues such as: Was the doctor on time? How friendly was the staff? Was I rushed through my appointment? This survey reveals doctors are listening to this feedback. In fact, 75 percent of doctors check more than one online rating site. Nearly 12 percent of physicians said they check reviews at least once per week. Another 33 percent said they monitor reviews monthly, while 42 percent check a few times per year. Only 13 percent said they almost never monitor online feedback from patients. Beyond just monitoring, physicians are also responding to patient feedback. One in three said they have written back in response to patient comments, according to the survey.

Despite progress being made with online reviews, a majority of doctors state they aren’t ready to embrace that other advancement born from the internet: online scheduling. Nearly half said they have no interest in allowing patients to schedule office visits online.

“It’s amazing to see the turnaround that has happened over the past five years. Doctors have realized they can build better relationship with patients when they interact with their online reviews,” said Mitch Rothschild, founder and executive chairman of Vitals. “Listening to feedback helps a doctor address problem areas for patients in their practice that they may have otherwise not known about. And better patient experiences have been linked in studies to better clinical outcomes.”



CMS Hospital Compare Website Updated with VA Data

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced the inclusion of Veterans Administration (VA) hospital performance data as part of the federal agency’s Hospital Compare website.

CMS Awards Funding to Special Innovation Projects

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has awarded 20, two-year Special Innovation Projects (SIPs) aimed at local efforts to deliver better care at lower cost.

Center of Excellence in Genomic Science to be Established in Chicago

The National Human Genome Research Institute has awarded $10.6 million over five years for the establishment of a new research center in Chicago to advance genomic science.

EHNAC and HITRUST Combine HIPAA Security Criteria, CSF Framework

The Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (EHNAC) and the Health Information Trust Alliance (HITRUST) announced plans to streamline their accreditation and certification programs.

Halamka on MACRA Final Rule: “CMS is Listening and I Thank Them”

Health IT notable expert John Halamka, M.D., CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, recently weighed in on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) final rule.

Texas Patient Care Clinic Hit with Ransomware Attack

Grand Prairie, Texas-based Rainbow Children's Clinic was the victim of a ransomware attack on its IT systems in August, affecting more than 33,000 patients, according to multiple news media reports this week.