Adventist Health West Leaders Manage EHR Implementation in the Context of Expansion | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Adventist Health West Leaders Manage EHR Implementation in the Context of Expansion

August 6, 2015
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
Implementation, standardization, governance, and management have been areas of focus at a time of growth and expansion at Adventist Health West

Things are moving quickly along a number of dimensions these days at Adventist Health West, the Roseville, California-based health system that encompasses 20 hospitals, more than 2,800 inpatient beds, more than 245 clinics and outpatient centers, and more than 50 rural health clinics across several western states. Adventist Health West clocks more than 1,000 patient visits per hour and more than 6,600 visits a day, and serves 1.7 million patients every year.

What’s more, the health system is continuing to grow through expansion and acquisition. Not surprisingly, for Adventist Health West’s healthcare IT leaders have a lot of processes to manage and tasks to take care of these days.

It is in that context that Loretta Sloan, an assistant vice president at Adventist Health West, presented regarding IT management and governance at Cerner Ambulatory Summit, hosted by the Kansas City-based Cerner Corporation, and held last month in Kansas City. Sloan and her colleagues have been partnering closely with Cerner as their core EHR vendor.

Describing some of the processes that she and her colleagues are currently involved in and which she described in her Cerner Ambulatory Summit presentation, Sloan spoke with HCI Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland about the range of challenges and opportunities facing her organization. Below are excerpts from that interview.

What did you talk about in Kansas City last week?

So what I presented last week was, I had started with who we are and some of those statistics and about our mission and vision. But then I dove into was our comprehensive transition from a lot of paper-based practices in 2011 to being fully implemented today. All clinics are except for our clinics in the state of Oregon, who were already using Epic for 10-12 years, so we haven’t transitioned them at this time. So they’re EHR (electronic health record)-based.

Loretta Sloan

How many months did it take for your organization to transition to becoming fully electronic?

Our first go-live was in May 2012, and our last was June 3, 2015. In that last go-live, we actually converted those clinics from another solution to Cerner, so they were already not paper-based. Our last paper-based practices converted to being electronic in June 2014. All the other conversions were from other solutions, so it basically took two years to transition from paper-based to electronic. And we’re acquiring practices or having them join us, all the time.

What were the biggest challenges involved in making the transition?

I would say the biggest challenges were around standardization. The way I would describe it, our clinics came together, a lot of practices came together, to be part of the Adventist Health organization, so there wasn’t a great deal of standardization, so we were standardizing while implementing, which increases the level of change management involved.

So the core challenge was the standardization of processes operating within the clinical workflow, then?

Correct. Our approach was to work with Cerner on some of the best practices as well as other organizations that done this with different systems, to determine best practices in our design and to create an overarching workflow design, which meant that some organizations had a lot of change to implement, and others, less, because we were moving towards a standardized workflow design.

What have been the biggest lessons learned in standardizing both workflow design and EHR implementation at the same time?

We were trying to meet the October 1, 2014 ICD-10 deadline, so time was the biggest constraint for us. If I had to do it over again, I would have done more standardization prior to the implementation, so we weren’t doing everything at once.

But little did you know that Congress would step in and foul up your plans!

Correct. But we were fairly far along already. And we were also converting our revenue cycle systems all to the Cerner system, meaning all the hospitals and all the clinics. We started that process in 2013, so when we hit 2013, we lined up all of our EHR timelines with the revenue cycle timeline, too, which was very aggressive initially, but when Congress changed the ICD-10 deadline, we changed that a lot.


Yes, that was a ‘wow.’

Given everything we’ve been discussing, what are the biggest pieces of advice you have for large health systems acquiring more clinics and hospitals?

One thing that has been our approach is that there needs to be an overall, system-wide executive sponsor and business owner—and we’re talking the business side. In physician services, I was the business owner, and my boss Don Jacobson, was the business owner. This gave IT to move conflicting requests through a business owner model so that IT wasn’t having to moderate conflicts. So they didn’t have to be in that position; they shouldn’t be.

From a governance standpoint, getting all the stakeholders together on the same page is generally very difficult, yes?


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More