In Connecticut, Elevating Analytics Across the Enterprise | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

In Connecticut, Elevating Analytics Across the Enterprise

October 4, 2016
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints
For Hartford-based Saint Francis Care, the first step to analytics improvement was conducting a simple organizational assessment

It was a few years ago when clinical and information technology leaders at the Hartford, Conn.-based Saint Francis Care committed to upgrading its technology platform, specifically its electronic health record (EHR), first on the inpatient side of the medical center, and then a year later on the outpatient side. It was also during this time when senior leadership at Saint Francis Care, now part of Trinity Health - New England, an integrated healthcare delivery system, posed to itself the core question of, “How can we better support our hospital mission, which is to [provide] the best care for a lifetime at Saint Francis Care?” says Danyal Ibrahim, M.D., chief data and analytics officer, emergency department physician.

And according to Ibrahim, the other key question to consider was that as the general healthcare landscape moves from volume to value, what were the organization’s capabilities on the analytics side? To this end, Ibrahim says that Saint Francis Care's assessment around analytics first involved identifying a data strategy, which was again, broadly speaking, to transform data in the organization to support better care, better health, and lower costs for a lifetime.

Drilling down, Ibrahim, whose specialty is toxicology/poisoning and says half of his time is spent in clinical with patients, while the other half is overseeing the analytics in the organization, notes that the analytics assessment was composed of direct interviews with very basic questions in a survey format that was sent to 100 individuals across the system in clinical, financial, IT, administrative, and leadership departments. The questions that were asked applied to the following various domains, Ibrahim reports: patient safety, quality, efficiency of the care delivered, patient engagement, patient experience, care coordination, care redesign, revenue and market share, population health, and workforce engagement.

“In each of these domains, I started off by asking if we have the data and analytics,” Ibrahim says. “So for the metrics, measurement, monitoring, and improvement efforts, do we really have that data? Second, do we have all the components of the data? Can you tell a comprehensive and meaningful patient story from when they come until they leave? Third, if we have the data and it’s integrated, do we apply sound analytical methods to it to derive meaningful conclusions? Are we presenting it in timely and intuitive manner? That speaks to the buy-in and the validity,” he says.

Danyal Ibrahim, M.D.

Ibrahim feels that in healthcare, there is often mistrust about the data which leads to drawing conclusions about incomplete data. So that led to the last question of the assessment—as ultimately the purpose of analytics is to aid and make better decisions at the point of care, can it identify the what, the who, and the where? “What’s going on, who is involved, and where is it happening? Ultimately, why is it happening? That will help apply the right intervention to move towards improvement,” he says.

Ibrahim says the assessment revealed that Saint Francis Care was doing well on the domains of revenue and cost, meaning it had a good sense about what its utilizations were and the cost around that. But when applied to the other domains such as quality and safety, efficiency, and patient and workforce engagement, gaps were identified. “The data was incomplete or the pieces weren’t integrated in these domains; we were not presenting it in a timely or simple way,” he says. “So ultimately the value of it was not intended, meaning we were not able to use it in a way to push the initiative, through identifying the opportunity and applying the intervention.”

The next stage for the organization was using the results of this assessment to create a plan of action. “We realized through the interviews and surveys that our data stewards and data domains are siloed,” says Ibrahim. Some of data is in the finance department, some of it is in IT, and some of it is in the quality department. So number one, we wanted to break those silos, so we can work together towards our common goal.”

As such, Ibrahim and his staff wanted to build a solid and organized team that incorporated all the different skillsets from multiple areas of the patient care system. “If you look at how analytics teams are siloed in our industry, you have financial analysts, IT [people], BI [business intelligence] analysts, and then clinical quality analysts. So we wanted to come up with multi-disciplinary team for all these fields,” says Ibrahim.

After tackling the people aspect, the next step was to tackle the technology. “We needed to be nimble in how to build the data platform that will accommodate our various data sources,” Ibrahim says. “We largely have one EHR [from Epic Systems], but we wanted to build a platform that allowed us to bring in data from other sources, too. We wanted to be able to bring in the data, clean it, normalize it, aggregate it, and present it in way that was meaningful—and then adopt meaningful measurement metrics,” he says. To this end, Saint Francis Care engaged in a partnership with RelayHealth, a McKesson subsidiary, which offered a vendor agnostic solution to solve these big data challenges. Ibrahim says that the organization had a history of using McKesson’s tools, so it was a natural fit.


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More