Facilitating Physicians | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Facilitating Physicians

January 31, 2008
by Daphne Lawrence
| Reprints
As hospitals look to differentiate themselves in the eyes of admitting docs, robust physician information systems are growing in popularity

Ken lawonn

Ken Lawonn

As the acute and ambulatory settings become more intertwined, satisfying admitting physicians means offering them a view into the hospital enterprise. In the hospital of today, that means remote access to patient information, anytime, anywhere for physicians. But can hospitals handle the IT challenges of this new paradigm?

For many hospitals, this IT transition to physician mobility begins with the implementation of an EMR. “Once you move to an EMR, physicians rely on the computer for information,” says Ken Lawonn, senior vice president and CIO of nine-hospital Alegent Health in Nebraska and southwestern Iowa.

But once physicians are computer-reliant, they need to be mobile as well, and that means implementing a physician information system. “There's no greater mobile workforce than physicians,” says Lawonn. “And mobility has to extend beyond the hospital.”

Physician information systems can cover a wide range of functions, including charge capture for more efficient billing. When integrated with the physician practice, many incorporate practice management components.

Jeff cash

Jeff Cash

Many hospitals have a mixed bag of functions available for physicians on the go. Most give the ability to view lab results, vital signs, allergies and medications, and sign off on certain procedures, usually through a variety of mobile devices like PDAs and Smartphones. Portal-based Web access is the industry standard.

Currently, according to Orem, Utah-based KLAS, the two market leaders in the space are Toronto-based Thomson Healthcare (which purchased MercuryMD in 2006) and Boston-based PatientKeeper — though they're not the only solutions in town. Many hospitals utilize mobile components offered by their EMR vendors, such as Meditech or Cerner.

But with different vendor systems, hardware and software available, what features are the most important to physicians?

When Jeff Cash, CIO at 370-bed Mercy Medical Center in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, began investigating a physician information system, he says he got tremendous push-back from his doctors, who felt the hospital's technology was too outdated. “We asked, ‘What would it take?’” he says. The physicians wanted a portal that was intuitive, designed for physicians, with the ability for some level of customization. They also wanted it to be Web-based and deployable from a PDA or Smartphone.

Mercy is live with PatientKeeper, which integrates with the hospital's Meditech system and is accessed by the physicians through a portal. “The docs never log into Meditech anymore,” Cash says. “They don't even think they're using Meditech, they think they're using PatientKeeper.”

Mercy's physician information system has two access methods — the Web portal and a separate product that supports a mobile phone interface. It's a PDA feature that also works on cell phones running a Windows mobile version. At Mercy, the doctors use it as they're rounding, but not all of them.

“Lots of doctors find it easier to use a desktop,” says Cash. “The PDA isn't for everyone.” Results can be viewed in the physician office in real time by logging on to the Web. “They're not ordering tests through the system yet, but they're signing off on their documentation.”

But what if a hospital has yet to go wireless? Lianne Stevens, vice president of information technology and CIO at The Nebraska Medical Center (NMC) found the Thomson product, which utilizes synching stations for mobile devices, a good fit with the hospital's GE Centricity EMR.

“The reality is that there are not enough workstations in the units for the physicians,” she says, making anytime access impossible. Stevens says she chose the Thomson synching solution because, “We wanted something that could be implemented quickly and that was not too complex.”

The synching stations download information from GE Centricity onto mobile devices. “Right now, we have 26 synching devices throughout the hospital,” Stevens says. She says once the hospital transfers to wireless capability, the physicians will be able to synch from anywhere. They will be able to use the same device whether they want to cradle-synch or use wireless.

At Alegent, Ken Lawonn took a different route as he began implementation of the Siemens Soarian clinical EMR. “One of our primary goals was to capture information as close to the point of care as possible and give the caregiver the most appropriate tools to do that,” he says.

Most agree there's a greater degree of accuracy with one entry, rather than writing it down and transferring it later. “We were a Siemens shop and, as we built and deployed Soarian, our physicians were very involved. One thing they said was they wanted access from anywhere — the office, home, out of town. We focused on trying to give them that.”

Alegent's Soarian clinical access is Web-based. The hospital system also uses document imaging that can be accessed remotely for progress notes and orders.

And the wireless device used in the hospital? “We like the C5 from Motion Computing (Austin, Texas),” says Lawonn. “It's a tablet that has the ability to scan.”


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More