Advocate Health Care Leaders Move Ahead to Improve Clinical Communications | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Advocate Health Care Leaders Move Ahead to Improve Clinical Communications

September 23, 2017
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
Advocate Health Care clinician and IT leaders make breakthroughs in mobile clinician communications

Improving communications among clinicians is becoming more urgent by the day, as both nurses and physicians experience more intense, task-packed workdays, and as inefficiencies and delayed care become literally more expensive for patient care organizations moving into value-based healthcare delivery and payment.

Clinician leaders at Advocate Health Care, based in the Chicago suburb of Downers Grove, and which is one of the largest integrated health systems in the Chicago metro area, were facing the same challenges as everyone else, when they first began looking at some of the communications breakdowns in their organization. The average turn-around time at Advocate hospitals was 20 minutes for a doctor, nurse or other care team member to get in touch with a fellow clinician in order to coordinate patient care. Clinicians had also voiced difficulty tracking their attempts at communicating with care team members. With awareness of the national evidence caused by communication breakdowns, coupled with their own need to align patient safety with consistent clinical communications, Advocate Health Care completed implementation of an enterprise secure clinical communications solution in 11 hospitals in 2014. For the next deployment phase, the largest health system in Illinois rolled out the solution to its 1,200 employed physicians who used Advocate’s call center. 

To speed up clinical communications and drive enterprise acceptance of the solution, Advocate IT leaders launched an “optimal enablement” initiative that measured three parameters of adoption success. If all three parameters are met, physicians are deemed fully compliant using the solution. As a result, the following innovations have taken place:

>  Hospital-based clinicians are now able to contact physicians and advanced practice clinicians through the software without going through a third party.

>  Physicians use the platform to communicate with colleagues and vice versa.


Clinical Team Communication and Data Access in the Palm of Your Hand

Eisenhower Health, a west coast-based Magnet Hospital, implemented an enterprise-wide solution enabling mobile communications and collaboration across all care teams, linking the entire enterprise...

>  Any care team member can initiate and receive clinical communication via an iPhone or Android device using a smartphone app.

Secondly, to maintain its optimal enablement initiative driving adoption, Advocate IT leaders went a step further improving upon this metric. They’ve developed a three-pronged sustainability strategy to maintain adoption momentum necessary to achieve compliance of seamless and secure standardized clinical communications across the continuum. That strategy encompasses the following:

>  Instituting a governance structure. Advocate formed a hospital steering committee comprising acute to post-acute network stakeholders: administrators, hospitalists and employed physicians, nurses, clinicians representing multiple disciplines, and IT professionals. As the foundation for sound decision-making and ethical practice, a governance structure is paramount to ensure asynchronous communications. The steering committee promotes mandated tool adoption and user accountability in the communication of care management.

>  Maintaining metrics and reporting. To ensure fine-tuning and usage of the tool, Advocate established key performance indicators (KPIs) and key result areas (KRAs) to achieve clinical communication goals specific to each user. For example, Advocate measured response times from initiating to receiving messages between physicians and nurses and vice versa.

>  Determining future goals. Advocate plans to tackle utilization management for chronically ill patients, ensuring providers are communicating frequently with them to help reduce preventable overuse of care services, such as ED visits. Advocate also will enroll more community care managers and advanced practice clinicians onto the platform.

Advocate leaders report the following results from implementing an enterprise clinical communications solution, provided by the Knoxville, Tenn.-based PerfectServe, to support this initiative:

>  With the solution designated the standard method for physician communication, primary care physicians, hospitalists and specialists report enjoying more efficient and speedy communications across both the acute and post-acute network. 

>  More than 95,000 secure messages per month equating to roughly over a million annually are read within 10 minutes of receiving—a dramatic decrease in response time. Advocate is experiencing steady improvement in this metric.

>  Physicians and nurses using the solution’s mobile app can verify if a message has been read or not, thanks to an auto indicator within the message thread. Having this notification empowers clinicians specifically to quickly communicate necessary clinical information and feel confident that their message is being read and addressed.

>  All data regarding attempts for contacting physicians are recorded.


Recently, Healthcare Informatics Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland spoke with two Advocate Health Care leaders about this initiative: Chris Jamerson, M.D., vice president, clinical informatics-Advocate Medical Group; and medical director of informatics-Advocate Children's Hospital; and Dennis Giles, director, Support Services, Tech Help Desk, Communication, and Information System, for Advocate Health Care.  Below are excerpts from that interview.

Dr. Jamerson, could you tell me a bit about your involvement in this initiative, and your role at Advocate Health Care?

Chris Jamerson, M.D.: I’m a general pediatrician, have been with Advocate and Advocate Medical Group for over eight years. A year ago, I stepped into the role of the CMIO, essentially, for the ambulatory side. So I’m responsible for the EMR; I’m kind of the interface between the providers and the IT team, around the EMRs.

And you, Mr. Giles?

Dennis Giles: I’ve been here at Advocate for 15 years. My role is with the communication and collaboration products, including PerfectServe. I’m also involved in support for the hospitals. The name of our department is now Health Informatics and Technology.

How did the goal of standardized clinical communication across the enterprise, emerge?

Giles: We identified the need for better clinical communications. That started at a time when Advocate was a system of hospitals that were pretty independent, and left alone to manage things their own way. We’re much more corporate today. And one hospital, Good Shepherd, and put together a committee to discuss the patient safety issues around clinician communications. They ended up choosing PerfectServe as a solution. We rolled it out and other hospitals heard about it, and then we ended up rolling it out to all the hospitals, and it became a corporate standard.

Is this essentially messaging software?

Giles: It started out with using a single phone number. Nurses had had rolodexes with paper, and phone numbers in desk drawers, or they would end up calling hospital operators. This software allowed us to call one number, and using logic, route that call to the physician on call. So it might be Chris today, but let’s say he’s on vacation; it will route the call to his practice partner. So it helped us get to the right doctor at the right time. And the software’s evolved; it started out as a paging facility, basically, but has become more robust, and encompasses texting, and now a web portal that allows them to text a message to a physician.

Dr. Jamerson, how did the pre- situation feel, for physicians and nurses? What was the imperative? And what did you accomplish?

As Dennis said, we were going through a corporate consolidation and alignment, and we’ve come a long way in that process since 2009-2010. And one of the things we’ve done is to start down a patient safety/high reliability journey. And this played into that really nicely. A lot of examples emerged as we started monitoring safety events and doing safety calls every day—there were a lot of challenges coming up. Nurses getting in touch with physicians, or physicians getting in touch with other physicians. Being able to quickly do that—the level of frustration got to the point that either the communication wouldn’t happen—the doctor would feel, I don’t have enough time to call and call back, and so on. So simplifying this through telephony and then later through the app, really helped a lot. It’s shown itself to be a real benefit as we’ve continued on this patient safety/high reliability journey.

Dr. Jamerson, can you share the perspective of physicians in practice, on an initiative like this?

Yes. Our clinicians are typically going to multiple sites—hospital, ambulatory—and they need to quickly communicate with each other. And you know, in the old days, the physician would typically practice at a single regular clinic site. But that’s no longer true, particularly as we expand out throughout the Chicago area. And in 2008, 2009, 2010, as we came together as a system, that necessitated the idea that we could quickly come together. And if I’m gone, they need to quickly connect with someone else and get the answer. You need quality discharges that are efficient, with good follow-up plans. You send a patient home and they might need to come in and see you in the clinic tomorrow or the next day—and just relying on a fax or some other outdated form of communication.

And as you move into population health and care management under accountable care contracts, this kind of innovation will only become more important, correct?

Yes, absolutely. Making sure that we’re able to keep patients in the system, so making sure that if they’re headed out of the hospital and are going to a post-acute-care setting like a nursing home or SNF, or an ambulatory care setting, we need good control over that; and we need to know the level and type of care we’re providing. And the nurse case managers, the care managers—that communication, being able to reach out to the right providers, using a reliable form of communication, is really crucial.

And how do you make sure a solution like this makes sense in terms of the technology and technological architecture needed to support it?

Giles: Our strategy moving forward is to really look outside the boundaries of the hospital to account for folks working out in the field like our care managers, and working across our ACO, working with all the teams. That communication platform has been an enabler in that. And our real strategy going forward is that the solution we’ve chosen is our communication tool for communicating anything about a patient to an Advocate clinician. And with that, one of the things we’ve done to make sure Advocate has a voice at the table, is to be part of the vendor’s advisory team. So we work with other patient care organizations across the country, to make sure the software develops correctly, to make sure the technology meets our needs.

Meanwhile, internally, we’ve created several committees to help achieve adoption. That can be a challenging thing when we’re working with private physicians who work at more than one hospital. We’ve looked a metrics to try to improve adoption. One of the messages we got back from physicians was, I try to reach other physicians on my smart phone, but physicians aren’t listed in Advocate’s directory. Or nurses trying to text physicians who hadn’t yet downloaded the app. So we have a steering committee dedicated to this vendor solution that’s more tactical, and a unified communications steering committee that’s more strategic. And on that latter committee, we’re asking, what is it like to create an optimal situation for physician communications. So, do they have the smartphone? Do they have the app on their smartphone? And is the hospital able to reach them directly, and are their colleagues able to reach them directly? And we went to each hospital and started working with the medical leadership of each hospital, and the executive leadership of each hospital. We had one hospital that really embraced it, and mandated the use of the communications tool. And now only two hospitals have not mandated its use. And back in 2015, we started that journey, in terms of governance and adoption. And we’ve made a ton of headway here. At the system level, we currently have an 80-percent adoption of the solution.

What has the physician experience been like, of this new system? What have you heard from doctors?

Jamerson: The overwhelming response to the solution has been positive. There were some pockets of resistance, people not wanting to change the way they communicated, or fears that they couldn’t disconnect. So we had to do some teaching around the rerouting element; and that usually overcome that resistance. Initially, it was just resistance about using new technology. So we had to help them understand that it actually would afford a greater level of communication between physicians and support staff, and that it would be a benefit to patient safety and to them, and would actually afford a broader range of options around call and around contact. And that was something new, something that traditional pager systems didn’t allow to be automated. Once people realized that you could customize this yourself, that added to people’s acceptance.

What have the biggest lessons have you learned around this process so far?

Jamerson: I’ve learned that you need to start by getting the education out there; education around whatever your proposed solution is, or changes, out there, to the frontline physicians and nurses and nurse practitioners and PAs, etc. They’re the end-users, and they can make or break something like this. So they need to know the ‘why,’ which is patient safety and improved turnaround time around communication; and the benefits of it. And it’s not the same thing in a different package, but the same thing plus a bunch of other stuff, that will give you more control. And when you’re talking about messaging, control is very important to physicians. Most practicing physicians right now still want some autonomy as a physician. If you can convince them that this actually provides more autonomy even while you’re standardizing on something, that’s important. Everyone needs to feel special, and feel that they have control. We communicated that, but we probably could have communicated that even earlier.

Giles: From a rollout and implementation perspective, it’s important to make sure you set up governance early, so you have governance teams that can manage issues and develop the strategy. And from that perspective, you also need to determine what metrics you’ll follow. You need to get the measurements out there so that everyone understands how you’re doing in terms of adoption of the product. And the final thing is partnering with all the clinician leaders, physician and nurse leaders. Make sure you set up partnerships. And of course, Chris hit the nail on the head; education is key.

What might happen in the next year or two, as this initiative evolves forward?

Giles: As the platform continues to change, one of the things we’re focused on now is allowing for bidirectional texting of information. Today, the nurse can text the physician, but the physician can’t yet text the nurse, the physician has to call. The technology allows for it, but we have to set up policies around that, around what the communication should look like. And you need measurements around following the policy, to make sure we have some kinds of guardrails around that, so we’re looking at programs that might be able to parse messages… So if we don’t want physicians to send orders around text, that we could monitor for that, and address it. Just making sure we put good thought around this new message.

So you want to set a framework and parameters around what you’d like physicians to share in text messages, and how, correct?

Giles: Yes, that’s exactly right.

The Health IT Summits gather 250+ healthcare leaders in cities across the U.S. to present important new insights, collaborate on ideas, and to have a little fun - Find a Summit Near You!


Report: At-Risk Medicare Seniors the Next Apple Watch Target?

January 18, 2019
by Rajiv Leventhal, Managing Editor
| Reprints

Apple is engaging in discussions with multiple private Medicare insurers about subsidizing the cost of the Apple Watch for at-risk people over 65 years old, according to a CNBC report.

This week’s report, from health tech reporter Christina Farr, noted, “The insurers are exploring ways to subsidize the cost of the device for those who can't afford the $279 price tag, which is the starting cost of an older model.”

The latest version of the Apple Watch—the Series 4—was launched in September, and as officials of the tech giant stated at the time, brings “advanced activity and communications features, along with revolutionary health capabilities, including a new accelerometer and gyroscope, which are able to detect hard falls, and an electrical heart rate sensor that can take an electrocardiogram (ECG) using the new ECG app.” This version retails for at least $399.

According to the CNBC report, “Apple has paid a visit to several of the largest insurers in the market, as well as some smaller, venture-backed Medicare Advantage plans. The people declined to be named as the discussions are still private.”

The watch’s electrocardiogram function and fall detection capabilities particularly make it appealing and valuable for seniors; about 19 million seniors, and growing, are enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan, which are private health plans that receive government payouts for providing services to seniors—about $10,000 per member, on average, Farr’s report noted.

According to Apple, the new Series 4 Apple Watch intermittently analyzes heart rhythms in the background and sends a notification if an irregular heart rhythm such as AFib is detected.  It can also alert the user if the heart rate exceeds or falls below a specified threshold.

And, the Apple Watch’s fall detection function utilizes a next-generation accelerometer and gyroscope, which measures up to 32 g-forces, along with custom algorithms to identify when hard falls occur, the company has stated.

To this end, data from health technology company HealthMine shows that 21 percent of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries use a fitness/activity/steps tracker; and 70 percent currently use digital tools, with a blood pressure monitor being used by 50 percent of beneficiaries.

In this realm, Apple is working with other major insurers as well. It was recently announced that UnitedHealthcare Motion, an employer-sponsored wellness program, is telling its participants they can get a free Apple Watch if they meet the insurer’s daily walking goals over a six-month period. For this initiative, program participants can use the Apple Watch to see how they are tracking against the program’s three daily goals—frequency, intensity, and tenacity—helping integrate physical activity and engagement with their health plan.

Industry observers have already begun to offer some reaction to CNBC’s story. In Farr’s report, Bob Sheehy, the CEO of Bright Health, an insurance start-up with a Medicare Advantage plan, and the former CEO of United Healthcare, spoke to the idea of seniors potentially avoiding expensive care visits by leveraging the device. “Avoiding one emergency room visit would more than pay for the device," said Sheehy.

More From Healthcare Informatics


PerfectServe Acquisition of Telmediq Consolidates Secure Communication Platforms

January 17, 2019
by David Raths, Contributing Editor
| Reprints
Combined companies have more than 500,000 clinical users across 250 hospitals, 27,000 physician practices and post-acute care organizations

PerfectServe, a provider of cloud-based clinical communication and collaboration solutions, has acquired competitor Telmediq, a secure communications platform provider for health settings.

Knoxville, Tenn.-based PerfectServe said it plans to support both solutions going forward, taking advantage of each platform’s cloud-based, service-oriented architecture to integrate complementary features.

Telmediq is deployed across 300 healthcare organizations and 80,000 users. It offers a call center solution, nurse mobility, advanced alert and alarm management capabilities, and mass notification functionality. Combined, PerfectServe and Telmediq have more than 500,000 clinical users across 250 hospital sites and 27,000 physician practices and post-acute care organizations. 

PerfectServe said the acquisition is an important step in its effort to build a care team collaboration platform that unifies the entire care team across the continuum, from inpatient, to outpatient, to patients at home. “Our vision is to build a platform that is separate from, transcends, and is fully integrated with the EHR and all other point-of-care technologies,” said Terry Edwards, president and CEO of PerfectServe, in a prepared statement. “The goal is to make it easy for clinicians to overcome persistent care coordination challenges that have existed in the industry for years.”

The Telmediq acquisition follows an investment last year in PerfectServe by private equity firm K1 Investment Management.



Related Insights For: Mobile


Research: By 2023, 5M Consumers will be Remotely Monitored by Providers

January 15, 2019
by Rajiv Leventhal, Managing Editor
| Reprints

Wearables, including health trackers and remote patient monitoring devices, are set to become “must-haves” in the delivery of healthcare, with an annual spend on these devices reaching an estimated $20 billion by 2023, according to new research.

The exploration into mobile devices, and more broadly digital health, conducted by Juniper Research, also noted that assistive “hearables,” or connected hearing aids made available via healthcare providers, as well as directly to customers at varying price models, will mean this sector generates revenues of over $40 billion by 2022. Together, healthcare spending in the wearables market is projected to reach $60 billion by 2023, according to the report.

The research found that adoption of healthcare wearables will be driven by improvements in remote patient monitoring technology, in addition to increased adoption by medical institutions. Juniper forecasts that 5 million individuals will be remotely monitored by healthcare providers by 2023.

The research also forecasts that the advanced ability of AI (artificial intelligence)-enabled software analytics to proactively identify individuals at risk of their condition worsening will witness increased confidence among medical practitioners and regulators with regard to sensor accuracy.

As wearables become part of patients’ treatment plans, manufacturers will seek to adjust their business models and generate revenues from devices being monitored. An example of this would be selling data produced by the devices to insurance providers, the researchers noted. Juniper forecasts that service revenues of this nature will reach $855 million by 2023.

However, data privacy and consent will continue to be a significant barrier. Improving healthcare systems, such as using AI-enabled software analytics, is contingent on patient data being anonymized. Some insurance providers are changing the dynamics; in order to be covered, they require a data feed from the policyholder’s device, the researchers explained.

Research author Michael Larner stated, “It is vital that patients are made aware of how their personal data will be used. If not, making wearables a ‘must-have’ to provide personalized care or receive medical insurance risks a backlash from patients and heightened regulatory scrutiny; stalling the effectiveness of remote monitoring.”

To this end, in a recent study published in Health Affairs, researchers looked at new digital health solutions—both consumer-facing and provider-facing—and concluded that while there is real collective potential in these solutions to address significant healthcare challenges, to date, there simply have not been studies that evaluated effectiveness in terms of reducing cost or improving access to care. Furthermore, clinical effectiveness studies with a high level of evidence were uncommon, according to this research.

See more on Mobile

agario agario---betebet sohbet hattı betebet bahis siteleringsbahis