Looking at a Recent Survey—and Patient Care Leaders’ Determination to Move Ahead on Population Health | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Looking at a Recent Survey—and Patient Care Leaders’ Determination to Move Ahead on Population Health

August 8, 2017
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
A practicing physician and industry expert looks at the results of a new survey affirming providers’ determination to move forward on population health strategies

A great deal of public attention was focused this spring and summer on the U.S. Congress, where various bills worked their way through both houses of Congress that would seek to repeal, or repeal and replace, the insurance-related provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Yet even as national attention was understandably focused on that drama, the reality is that, earlier this year, it was made clear that the so-called international health system reform elements of the law were largely going to be spared any threat of repeal.

And, with regard to that, a recently published survey confirms that most leaders of U.S. patient care organizations are pushing ahead with their plans to participate fully in population health management and accountable care initiatives. Indeed, more than 80 percent of patient care organization executives responding to a survey conducted online in July by the Salt Lake City-based Health Catalyst, said that the effort to repeal and replace the ACA has not caused them to pause or otherwise change their approach to population health management. In fact, 68 percent of survey respondents reported that population health management is “very important” to their healthcare delivery strategy during the next two years, while fewer than 3 percent assign it no importance at all.

According to the survey data, 82 percent of survey takers indicated they are continuing with their PHM strategy in spite of uncertainty over the future of ACA. Four percent of respondents said their organizations were actually accelerating their PHM plans.

As our news article noted, when asked to clarify why they were accelerating their plans, survey respondents mirrored the answer of a physician leader at a large multispecialty physician group near Boston, who wrote, “Accelerating your PHM strategy has never been more important given uncertainty and expanding hurdles to achieving quality care and outcomes.”  Another 4 percent of respondents answered that they were “pausing” their PHM plans in response to the current political situation.  Ten percent of survey takers said they were undecided on the question.

Still, while enthusiasm for population health management remains high, relatively few organizations have taken on PHM contracts with payers that put them at risk of a financial loss if they fail to meet goals such as improving the health of their patient population.

When asked how soon they expect to have more than 30 percent of their patient population covered by such risk-based contracts, 37 percent said achieving that level of risk would take between three and five years.  The next largest group put the date within the next one to two years. Fourteen percent estimated it would take six to 10 years.  Only 13 percent of respondents—the smallest share for this survey question—said their organizations have already achieved the threshold of having 30 percent of their patients covered by contracts with downside risk.

What’s more, the most common impediment to starting a PHM program or succeeding with an existing program, according to the survey data, is “financial issues” such as “getting paid for our efforts” and “balancing competing contract incentives.”  That answer, selected by 37 percent of survey takers, reflects the pressures that healthcare organizations face as they attempt to operate under the dominant fee-for-service reimbursement model while simultaneously transitioning to value-based care.


The next most significant impediment to starting or realizing success from PHM, according to the survey, is access to high-quality data and analytics (17 percent). Data access also figured into the fifth most commonly selected barrier to PHM, “risk evaluation issues” (9 percent), including “access to the right data useful to evaluate at-risk contracts.”

Meanwhile, in the context of the release of the results of the survey at the end of last month, Healthcare Informatics Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland interviewed Amy Flaster, M.D. Dr. Flaster is a practicing internist at Brigham & Women’s Hospital in boston, an instructor at Harvard Medical School, and an assistant medical director for population health management at Partners HealthCare. She is also vice president of population health management and care management at the Salt Lake City-based HealthCatalyst. Per the terms of her interview with Healthcare Informatics, all of her comments here reflect her perspectives in her position at HealthCatalyst. Below are excerpts from the interview conducted last week.

It appears now that any repeal of the ACA in Congress appears unlikely, though in any case, internal health system reform was no longer jeopardized. Still, there was a feeling of uncertainty. But the HealthCatalyst survey certainly confirmed provider leaders’ intentions to move forward on population health, correct?

Yes, that’s right. Folks are taking a long-term approach—and the key elements of population health care providing better care in the right venue, at lower cost. And I would agree, that definitely is the takeaway as well.

In that context, where are we as an industry on the journey of 1,000 miles around population health management?


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More