Readmissions and the Mechanics of Care Transitions | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Readmissions and the Mechanics of Care Transitions

March 19, 2012
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
How leaders at Michigan’s Spectrum Health System are finding ways to address the readmissions of CHF patients

Clinician leaders at the Spectrum Health System, an eight-hospital, integrated regional health system based on Grand Rapids, Mich., have been succeeding in reducing avoidable hospital readmissions. In fact, the health system has successfully reduced readmissions for patients in their cardiac care unit in less than two years.

At the core of this accomplishment has been work that Michael Dickinson, M.D., medical director for heart failure and for heart transplants for Spectrum Health, and his multidisciplinary team have led in this area. Dr. Dickinson and his team have designed a cardiology-specific unit dedicated to the care of discharged patients with congestive heart failure [CHF] and cardiovascular diseases. Among other elements in the program, a cardiologist visits one day a week to see new and existing patients, while a heart failure-trained physician’s assistant visits on another day and provides additional input concerning each patient’s progress.

The methodology involved has attracted strong interest on the part of the health system’s cardiac surgeons, who have made it their referral center of choice for their post-open heart surgery patients. Dr. Dickinson spoke recently with HCI Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland about this innovative program. Below are excerpts from that interview.

What are the main elements of your organization’s readmissions reduction program?

Spectrum Health is, like many [multi-hospital] systems, an amalgam; it was created by a merger and by acquisitions. Because of that, we have a very high volume; we average over 100 CHF admissions per month just at the main facility. And everyone’s concerned about readmissions requirements. To me, that’s an appropriate trigger for looking at what we do in terms of readmissions, and about quality. But it’s not easy to make progress; the reasons a patient can be readmitted can be complicated and multi-factorial; and the readmission might be caused by different things. So you have to look at different things. So we created something called “H2O”—Hospital To Office. We decided that transitions to the physician office were a key area. Our hope was that managing that area would reduce the odds of readmission; and that was based not only on our own personal impressions, but also on IHI’s recommendations on seeing a patient within 5 days of discharge [recommendations from the Cambridge, Mass.-based Institute for Healthcare Improvement]. And we found that 50 percent of our patients readmitted had not been seen by an outpatient provider.

We didn’t know whether these readmissions were just a failure of transition, or whether or not the patients involved were really sick enough that the readmissions couldn’t have been averted anyway. We didn’t know, because we didn’t have the data. And we discovered that we had a very chaotic discharge process, with patients seen anywhere from a week to a month after discharge, and that was unacceptable to us. We had had some experience with Lean and Six Sigma, and so we brought in a Six Sigma expert who created a Kaizen event for us, using Lean and Six Sigma principles, and we took this on as a project, with the goal of rapid-cycle improvement.

Michael Dickinson, M.D.

What was the timeframe around this activity?

This started in November 2009, when the Six Sigma expert came in. And we decided this needed to be a partnership between the hospital and the physician group, and we also decided to bring in Priority Health, a large insurer, and one of the parts of our system—it’s the second-largest third-party payer in Michigan after Blue Cross. At that time, the medical group was an independent private-practice group; in January 2010, Spectrum acquired the group.

So we discovered that our discharge process was chaotic; we also realized that with traditional office scheduling, we couldn’t work this out. Our physicians were booked out three to six months in advance with appointments, and even our mid-level providers were booked out for two to four weeks. And how do you coordinate that? Because you may decide tomorrow afternoon that a patient may need to go home, but you don’t even have the system set up to arrange that follow-up appointment. The process was inefficient, and involved too many steps.

So we took one of our experienced schedulers from the office and moved her into the hospital, so now, whenever we have a patient in the hospital, we send a message to her to arrange a follow-up. We also took hospital-based physician assistants, and partly shifted them over to the office. Three of them spend a day a week or part of a day a week in the office, and that shift created enough timeslots, as well as improving satisfaction for the PAs in terms of the variety of their workload. Another factor here is that office-based  PAs aren’t usually used to seeing patients who have just been discharged.

So this improved the available expertise, correct, since the formerly hospital-based physician assistants are now office-based?

Exactly. And also, a lot of this involves just making sure the patients understand what they need to understand at discharge, so they’re compliant with their medications, and so forth. What’s more, a lot of times, if a patient doesn’t have a family member to help them, like an adult son or daughter to pick up a new prescription, they’ll just go back to what they were doing before.


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More