Government Signals New ICD-10 Deadline, Hospital Payment Updates
Key Takeaway: Last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced their intentions to set Oct. 1, 2015, as the new deadline for transitioning to ICD-10. The agency also proposed hospitals payment updates for 2015 that are subject to Meaningful Use status and quality measure submission for the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program.
Why it Matters: By tying hospital reimbursement to participation in Meaningful Use, the federal government is taking another significant step in healthcare payment and delivery reform. The proposal solidifies a permanent role for the Meaningful Use program beyond the period of incentive payments, and it further binds quality reporting for IQR and MU.
Last week, CMS officials released an annual update to hospital reimbursement through the Inpatient Prospective Payment System. While the proposed rule would increase payments to inpatient hospitals, aggregate payments (operating and capital) are expected to drop $241 million in 2015. Included in the update were new provisions that further ingrain Meaningful Use status as a key indicator for payment bonuses and penalties in 2015 and beyond.
The proposed rule would give hospitals the opportunity to receive as much as a 2.1 percent payment increase if they submit quality data for IQR and are successful Meaningful Use participants. For hospitals that submit IQR data, but fail to meet Meaningful Use requirements in 2015, a payment increase of 1.425 percent is possible. And hospitals that neither submit quality data nor meet MU requirements would receive a 0.75 percent increase.
The rule also referenced ICD-10 codes and specifically mentioned Oct. 1, 2015, as a deadline; however, the rule did not official propose such a change to the ICD-10 date. After period of brief confusion, during which several news outlets and associations erroneously reported the date change, CMS officials issued a statement outlining their intentions to make Oct. 1, 2015, the official new date through an upcoming “interim final rule.” CIOs and other health IT stakeholders can consider the new ICD-10 date as Oct. 1, 2015, for planning purposes, but stakeholders should be mindful of how quickly things can change in Washington, D.C.
Health IT Policy Committee Welcomes Three New Members
Key Takeaway: Three new members of the Health IT Policy Committee were announced; they will represent vendors, vulnerable populations and healthcare “consumers.”
Why It Matters: The Office for the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC) is reorienting both the Health IT Policy Committee and Standards Committee to focus on a range of activities, including patient safety, EHR certification and standards-based exchange. These and subsequent appointees should be expected to inform policymaking by incorporating their fresh points of view with lessons learned from the last five years of Committee work. Last week federal officials announced three new appointments to the Health IT Policy Committee. Christoph Lehmann, from Vanderbilt University; Neal Patterson, CEO of Cerner; and Kim Schofield, a health educator from Georgia, will represent underserved populations, vendors and consumers, respectively. The work facing the HIT Policy Committee and the Standards Committee will be focused on broad issues, including:
- Advanced health models and meaningful use
- HIT implementation, usability and safety
Interoperability and health information exchange
House Energy and Commerce Committee Calls for Input on Telemedicine
Key Takeaway: Last week at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing called “Telehealth to Digital Medicine: How 21st Century Technology Can Benefit Patients,” a bipartisan group of Representatives supported increasing access to care by improving telemedicine policies.
Why it Matters: Many Representatives at the hearing focused on licensure and reimbursement as main barriers to practicing telemedicine and emphasized the opportunity to lower healthcare costs and achieve better outcomes through the appropriate use of telemedicine.
Representatives Pitts (R-PA), Pallone (D-NJ), Harper (R-MS), Upton (R-MI) and Burgess (R-TX) gave opening remarks asking how the government can support technology adoption to lower healthcare costs for Medicare and Medicaid. One of the five witnesses cautioned against defining the types of technology that constitute telemedicine visits because the definition would likely be obsolete in a few years – as that market continues to innovate, a simple video conference or phone call may not be the only ways to communicate with patients in remote locations.
In related news, the Federation of State Medical Boards adopted a new model telehealth policy last week in hopes of harmonizing the variety of state laws that exist. The policy received criticism because its telemedicine definition excludes audio-only/telephone conversations as well as email and fax conversations, and supports videoconferencing that mimics a traditional in-person office visit.
CHIME Questions Value of Voluntary 2015 Edition Certification
Key Takeaway: CHIME joined several industry voices in recommending ONC reconsider its proposed rulemaking schedule and scope. The pace of regulation in health IT policy has outstripped the industry’s capacity to absorb changes, the nation’s CIOs said.
Why It Matters: ONC is looking to develop an extensible pattern of rulemaking for EHR certification that addresses needed bug fixes, incorporates emerging standards and identifies areas for future software development work. If ONC chooses to forego or limit the 2015 Edition proposed rule, industry will need to prove it can accomplish these goals without regulation.
Earlier this year, ONC proposed a voluntary 2015 Edition EHR certification update, describing the agency’s vision of an extensible certification policy approach that addresses technological deficiencies in currently certified products; incorporates findings and emerging standards; and identifies areas for future software development work.
In comments submitted to ONC last week, CHIME noted its support of these goals as part of federal certification, but questioned the breadth and timing of this NPRM. “The pace of regulation in health IT policy has drastically increased in the last five years,” CHIME noted. “This trend is resultant from the nearly $30 billion Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, and its associated timelines – not necessarily in response to market failures or deficiencies in healthcare technology.”
CHIME recommended that ONC move forward with plans to investigate 2017 Edition criteria further and reconsider the more incremental, periodic updates to CEHRT Editions envisioned in this NPRM after the 2017 Edition is deployed for Stage 3. Further, CHIME encouraged ONC to develop a process to identify “bug fixes” in the future through an open, transparent process, such as hearings conducted by the Health IT Standards Committee, which can be regularly convened to provide periodic updates less frequently than the NPRM proposes.
CHIME’s comments can be found HERE.