Key Takeaway: Patients will have the right under HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) to have direct access to lab test results, regardless of state laws or if the treating physician has counseled the patient.
Why it Matters: CIOs who are responsible for facilities in multiple states will no longer have to comply with different access laws for posting lab test results online. This final rule gives laboratories thirty days (plus a 30-day extension option) to comply with a patient request.
Final rules, nearly two years in the making, were released Monday outlining a new right for individuals to have direct access to laboratory test results. “While patients can continue to get access to their laboratory test reports from their doctors,” CMS says in an announcement, “these changes give patients a new option to obtain their test reports directly from the laboratory while maintaining strong protections for patients’ privacy.” Labs that were exempt under HIPAA from having to comply with such requests will now have 30 days to give patient test results. Additionally, the final rule pre-empts 20 state laws that prohibit patients from accessing lab results without first discussing them with a doctor. “We believe 30 days is generally sufficient time to allow a treating provider to receive a test report in advance of the patient’s receipt of the report and to communicate the result to and counsel the patient as necessary…” the final rule states.
This timeframe in no way changes Meaningful Use requirements to give patients the ability to view online, download and transmit information about a hospital admission within four business days.
CHIME will develop a forthcoming “CIO Cheat Sheet” for this final rule, so please convey any questions or thoughts to Jeff Smith, Senior Director of Federal Affairs.
EHR Certifying Body Exits Meaningful Use Program
Key Takeaway: The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) announced plans to stop testing and certifying EHRs, effective immediately.
Why it Matters: CCHIT was the government’s dominant certification body. It tested and certified nearly half of the 722 EHR products currently certified to 2014 Edition CEHRT.
What’s Next? CIOs should contact their EHR vendor(s) to determine whether they have a continuity plan in place to ensure they will be able to maintain their vendor’s certifications.
Rather than play the role of referee, CCHIT wants to join the game. According to Alisa Ray, CCHIT executive director, the move will enable providers and vendors to receive “greater levels of support and counsel” on health IT regulations. “It’s apparent to both providers and vendors that the pace of ONC 2014 Edition certification has been slowed by the challenges of more rigorous criteria and testing, and the timing and nature of future federal health IT program requirements remain uncertain,” Ray said in a statement. The nonprofit group also announced a new partnership with HIMSS to provide consulting services to health IT developers on the requirements for certifying their EHR technologies and satisfying health IT regulations.
For providers confused about the implications of this announcement, they should first determine if CCHIT was the certifying body of record for their 2014 Edition EHR. You can also search the CHPL here. If their vendor was certified by CCHIT, providers should seek an update on the vendor’s transition plans immediately. For vendors that were certified by CCHIT, this announcement does not likely affect the standing of the certifications attained under the 2014 certification program. And CCHIT said a process has been put in place to transfer certification records for maintenance purposes to ICSA Labs, another certification body authorized by ONC.
CHIME staff will engage policymakers and industry sources to determine what broader implications this move may have. CHIME members with questions should contact Jeff Smith, Senior Director of Federal Affairs.
Delivery Reform Initiatives Gain More Traction, Show Positive Results
Key Takeaway: CMS announced last week that participants in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) netted more than $125 million in savings. Officials praised the performance of the Accountable Care Organizations, calling the first year “a very strong start,” for participants.
Why it Matters: This is among the first program-wide evaluations for government ACOs. CIOs should expect that continued positive results from the program will increase demand for participation and will embolden other delivery reform pilots, such as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative.
Through the MSSP and the Pioneer ACO program, policymakers believe CMS has saved $273 million in 2012, the first year of the programs’ operation. Government data indicate that 54 of 114 of the ACOs that started operations in 2012 had lower expenditures than projected. Of these 54 ACOs that exceeded their benchmarks in the first 12 months, 29 generated shared savings totaling more than $126 million, the agency said. Meanwhile, participants in the Pioneer ACOs “generated gross savings of $147 million in their first year while continuing to deliver high-quality care.” As a sign that policymakers intend to double-down on ACOs and similar delivery reform initiatives, officials announced in December the addition of 123 new ACOs for 2014. And, last week, CMS officials said 232 acute-care hospitals, skilled nursing homes, physician group practices, long-term care hospitals and home health agencies have agreed to participate in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative – the largest such demonstration ever constructed.
Public Health Accreditation Board Updates Standards
Key Takeaway: The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB), a not-for-profit organization that provides accreditation to public health departments, has updated accreditation standards – some of which focus on information technology requirements.
Why it Matters: MU Stage 1 contains three public health menu objectives that become core objectives in MU Stage 2. With these standards updates, public health departments are expected to have “Process(es) and/or protocol(s) for the collection, review, and analysis of comprehensive surveillance data on multiple health conditions from multiple sources,” including providers.
According to PHAB officials, new standards will help public health departments create the information technology infrastructure needed to support Meaningful Use objectives –this includes not only the collection of data, but also maintaining privacy and security of the data. Read more about the progress of Meaningful Use public health reporting in this January HIT Policy Committee presentation. CIOs should determine if their public health partners are PHAB accredited; they should promote such accreditation if their public health partners are unaware of the opportunity.
CHIME News & Notes
CHIME CIOs Explain ‘Why Public Policy Matters’
During a College Live event held last week, two CHIME Board members discussed “the Alphabet Soup” of federal government. Charles Christian, VP and CIO at St. Francis Hospital, and Indranil Ganguly, VP and CIO at JFK Health System, explained how CHIME works with federal agencies and discussed why CIOs should care. “Part of every CIO’s job is to anticipate the future and to plan for that future. If I plan for a future without an understanding of the political and policy context, especially in healthcare, I’m not doing my job,” said Christian during the online event. “We can either try to predict how the future looks, or – through CHIME Public Policy – we can shape the future we want,” added Ganguly. For an archive of the session and slides, click here.
Going to HIMSS14 and Interested in Meeting Government Officials?
CHIME Public Policy is busy coordinating meetings with leaders at CMS, ONC and other federal agencies. Please contact Jeff Smith, Sr. Director of Federal Affairs, for more information on times and dates.
Edited by Gabriel Perna