Is technology spending impervious to recent economic uncertainties? | [node:field-byline] | Healthcare Blogs Skip to content Skip to navigation

Is technology spending impervious to recent economic uncertainties?

October 21, 2008
by anonymous
| Reprints

I read a short article that attempted to explain why technology spending (in this case wireless technology) would not be affected by the recent economic events. The reason was simple. Healthcare will be looking for ways to cut costs and increase efficiency and this technology can help. While I agree that this technology can certainly help, I don’t think that many hospitals are in a position to spend (in order to save). The economic impact is too great. For example, a NY Times article describes how disappearing credit is forcing hospitals across the country to delay improvements and new purchases. Closer to home in MA the financial crisis has had a substantial impact on our state budget. Last week the governor announced cuts that will hit two of our safety net hospitals in the form of lower Medicaid payments, in the millions of dollars.

Jane Metzger, my colleague in Emerging Practices, and a board member at one of the safety net hospitals summed it up quite well. The loss of dollars has reached a point where the hospital has enough to spend to keep the facility going. Projects in progress are being delayed with very few new ones on the horizon. If the choice is for new technology or replacing automatic doors and facility upgrades there is really not much to discuss.

While many hospitals are not financially squeezed as safety net hospitals, they are all feeling the pinch. New purchases will need to have a very compelling and quick ROI. In addition Michael Craige’s blog entry from last week offers great advice on how IT can help the hospital save money and increase productivity.

The Health IT Summits gather 250+ healthcare leaders in cities across the U.S. to present important new insights, collaborate on ideas, and to have a little fun - Find a Summit Near You!


See more on