AHA Voices Concerns With 21st Century Cures Act’s Interoperability Provisions | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

AHA Voices Concerns With 21st Century Cures Act’s Interoperability Provisions

July 13, 2015
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

The passing of the 21st Century Cures Act in the U.S. House of Representatives was praised by several health IT associations, but the AHA is one organization that still has concerns regarding the bill’s interoperability provisions.

On July 10, the 21st Century Cures Act, H.R. 6, passed by a vote of 344-77 in the House, sending it to the U.S. Senate. The main focus of the legislation is an attempt to remove regulatory roadblocks in the review process for new pharmaceuticals and medical devices on the part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In addition, according to Congress.gov, the federal government’s official legislation tracking service, “Requirements are established [in the bill] for interoperability and certification of health information technology. Practices that discourage the exchange of electronic health information are prohibited.”

After the House’s passage of the bill, the Ann Arbor, Mich.-based College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) released a statement attributed to Leslie Krigstein, interim vice president of public policy, praising the bill’s focus on interoperability. Additional praise for the House of Representatives’ passage of the bill came from the Charlotte-based Premier healthcare alliance.

Nonetheless, in a letter to leaders on the Committee of Energy and Commerce, American Hospital Association (AHA) executive vice president Rick Pollack said, “While we appreciate the positive changes made to the interoperability provisions and elsewhere in this legislation, the enforcement provisions in Section 3001 still rely on fraud and abuse mechanisms that will result in unfair sanctions to hospitals and other providers. The bill also includes an overly broad definition of “information blocking” that would result in penalties for providers’ reasonable business practices and beneficial modifications to information technology (IT) systems that improve patient care.”

Regarding information blocking sanctions, AHA said it said it strongly opposes any sanctions on providers beyond the existing electronic health record (EHR) Incentive Programs. “For hospitals and other care providers, Medicare fraud and abuse mechanisms, such as OIG investigations or imposition of civil monetary penalties, to address concerns about ‘information blocking’ are unnecessary and duplicative,” AHA said.

According to the letter, “The AHA recommends the use of the existing structures of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs to promote information sharing. The programs already include specific requirements for providers to share health information. In addition, current law includes provisions requiring healthcare providers to make an affirmative attestation to the government that they have not taken steps to limit the interoperability of their EHRs as part of the requirements of meaningful use. Penalties for failing to meet meaningful use are significant, and grow larger over time. We do not believe the penalties contained in H.R. 6 are needed,” it said.

Regarding the “broad definition of “information blocking,” AHA said that Section 3001 applies the same definition of “information blocking” to both providers and vendors.  “At its core, the definition encompasses ‘business, technical and organizational practices’ that ‘prevent or materially discourage the access, exchange, or use of electronic health information,’” AHA said. “Such practices describe virtually every aspect of a provider’s information sharing activity. Instead of this broad definition applied to all parties, the AHA recommends that vendors and providers have separate definitions of ‘information blocking’ because their roles in information sharing are unique,” the letter read.

Get the latest information on Meaningful Use and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More



Community Data Sharing: Eight Recommendations From San Diego

A learning guide focuses on San Diego’s experience in building a community health information exchange and the realities of embarking on a broad community collaboration to achieve better data sharing.

HealthlinkNY’s Galanis to Step Down as CEO

Christina Galanis, who has served as president and CEO of HealthlinkNY for the past 13 years, will leave her position at the end of the year.

Email-Related Cyber Attacks a Top Concern for Providers

U.S. healthcare providers overwhelmingly rank email as the top source of a potential data breach, according to new research from email and data security company Mimecast and conducted by HIMSS Analytics.

Former Health IT Head in San Diego County Charged with Defrauding Provider out of $800K

The ex-health IT director at North County Health Services, a San Diego County-based healthcare service provider, has been charged with spearheading fraudulent operations that cost the organization $800,000.

Allscripts Touts 1 Billion API Shares in 2017

Officials from Chicago-based health IT vendor Allscripts have attested that the company has reached a new milestone— one billion application programming interface (API) data exchange transactions in 2017.

Dignity Health, CHI Merging to Form New Catholic Health System

Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI), based in Englewood, Colorado, and San Francisco-based Dignity Health officially announced they are merging and have signed a definitive agreement to combine ministries and create a new, nonprofit Catholic health system.