British Researchers Question Cost Benefits of Telehealth | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

British Researchers Question Cost Benefits of Telehealth

March 22, 2013
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Telehealth does not appear to be a cost-effective addition to standard support and treatment for patients with long-term conditions, according to a recent study published in the British Medical Journal.

For the study, a team of U.K. researchers examined the costs and cost effectiveness of telehealth compared with usual care over 12 months in 965 patients with a long-term condition (heart failure, COPD or diabetes).

The study is part of the British government’s Whole Systems Demonstrator Trial. Of the 965 patients, 534 received telehealth equipment and support, while 431 received usual care. The results took account of costs to both health and social care systems.

The cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY), a combined measure of quantity and quality of life, of telehealth when added to usual care was 92,000 pounds, or about $140,000. This is well above the cost effectiveness threshold of 30,000 pounds ($45,700) set by the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The probability of cost effectiveness was low (11 percent).

Even when the effects of equipment price reductions and increased working capacity of services were combined, the probability that telehealth is cost effective was only about 61 percent, at a threshold of 30,000 pounds per QALY.

The authors say that the QALY gain by people using telehealth in addition to standard support and treatment was similar to those receiving usual care, and total costs for the telehealth group were higher. As such they conclude, “Telehealth does not seem to be a cost-effective addition to standard support and treatment.”

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

Trump will Nominate Acting VA Secretary Wilkie for Permanent Position

Just a day after the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Cerner inked their $10 billion EHR (electronic health record) deal, President Trump said he would be nominating Acting VA Secretary Robert Wilkie for the permanent position.

ONC Names API Server Showdown Stage 2 Winner

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has named 1UpHealth as the Stage 2 winner of the “Secure API Server Showdown” challenge.

EHNAC Developing Trusted Exchange Accreditation Program

To align with the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement, the Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission, a nonprofit standards development organization and accrediting body, is working with other organizations to establish a new Trusted Exchange Accreditation Program.

Lawmakers Demand New VA CIO, Citing “Malign Neglect” on EHR Project

A group of Democratic federal lawmakers, five senators and six members of Congress, are calling out the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for what they call “malign neglect” in the agency’s efforts to achieve electronic health record (EHR) modernization.

Medical Record Access Proves Costly for Some Patients, GAO Report Finds

Federal law requires healthcare providers to give patients access to their medical records, but according to a new GAO report, some patients believe they’re being charged too much to access their records.

Parkland’s Innovation Bridge Takes ‘Genius Bar’ Approach to Digital Health Apps

Taking inspiration from the Apple Genius Bar and Ochsner Health System’s O Bar, the Dallas-based Parkland Center for Clinical Innovation in collaboration with Parkland Health & Hospital System has opened an “Innovation Bridge” to assist patients with health-related apps.