Certification Meeting Leaves CCHIT Fate Unclear | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Certification Meeting Leaves CCHIT Fate Unclear

July 16, 2009
by root
| Reprints

The task of developing and maintaining certification criteria should be separate from the function of actually testing software or organizations against that criteria, and there should be more than one organization that performs such testing, according to the HIT Policy Committee Workgroup on Certification and Adoption, which delivered its recommendations to the overall committee today.

However, apart from endorsing five high-level recommendations, the overall workgroup did not endorse the presentation in total, leaving the fate of CCHIT unclear.

The most vocal critic of the suggestions was Neal Calman of the Institute for Family Health, who expressed concern that such a change in process would create paralysis in the market just when providers must embark on their HIT journey, if they are to qualify for HITECH funds.

The five accepted goals were:

  1. Focus Certification on Meaningful Use
  2. Leverage Certification process to improve progress on Security, Privacy, and Interoperability
  3. Improve objectivity and transparency of the certification process
  4. Expand Certification to include a range of software sources: Open source, self-developed, etc.
  5. Develop a Short-Term Transition plan

In addition to advocating that more than one organization be eligible to perform certification testing, the workgroup suggested that HHS Certification criteria should be developed by ONC with the involvement of NIST, which would assist in developing a “comprehensive process for conformity assessment including testing, certification, accreditation and surveillance.”

The workgroup further suggested that the new certification criteria be limited in scope, focused directly on meeting the meaningful use definition, also presented to the committee today. To bridge the current CCHIT certification criteria with the new HHS Certification criteria, gaps would be identified and published. The workgroup stated that it could have such a gap analysis ready by Labor Day.



In case anyone missed the last three days of meetings -) I have posted the rough draft transcript and meeting materials here:



Survey: Most Providers Say Interoperability by 2020 Not Attainable with Current Federal Policies

The majority of healthcare providers (71 percent) believe that current federal polices, committees and regulations are not sufficient to help the country attain meaningful health IT interoperability by 2020.

House Committee Presses Nuance Executives on NotPetya Attack

he U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee is requesting that Nuance Communications executives provide more information about the malware incident, called NotPetya, that impacted the company, along with multinational companies in 65 countries, back in June.

Regenstrief Researchers to Study Impact of HIE on Emergency Care

Scientists at the Indianapolis-based Regenstrief Institute are conducting what they say is the first study of health information exchange (HIE) use over multiple years to evaluate whether it improves patient outcomes in emergency departments.

Report: Healthcare Organizations Struggle with Human Error in Securing PHI

In the first nine months of 2017, unintended disclosure accounted for 41 percent of healthcare data breach incidents, according to a report from specialist insurer Beazley.

Three More Providers Receive 2017 HIMSS Davies Awards

Three patient care organizations have received the 2017 global Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Enterprise Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence for healthcare technology innovations that improve patient outcomes.

Medtronic, American Well Team Up to Integrate Telehealth Capabilities

Medtronic and American Well announced a partnership to offer a telehealth solution focused on the unique needs of the complex, chronic, co-morbid patient population.