CMS Provides More Detail on Meaningful Use Hardship Exceptions | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

CMS Provides More Detail on Meaningful Use Hardship Exceptions

March 11, 2014
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints
“2014 EHR vendor issues” now can be used as reason for application

Just a few days after GOP senators pressed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for more clarification on meaningful use hardship exceptions, the federal agency has provided more details for eligible hospitals and eligible professionals participating in the program.

CMS has made the hardship exception applications for eligible professionals and hospitals available on its website, and added language in both that specifies hardship exceptions can be applied for in the event of "2014 EHR vendor issues." Getting into more detail, the applications read, “During the fiscal year (2014) preceding the payment adjustment year (2015), the hospital's EHR vendor was unable to obtain 2014 certification or the hospital was unable to implement meaningful use due to 2014 EHR certification delays.”

Eligible hospitals will have until midnight, April 1, 2014, to apply for the exception, while eligible professionals will have until July 1, 2014. If approved, an exception will be valid for one payment year. If the hospital claims a hardship exception for the following payment year, a new application must be submitted. Determinations made by CMS or their designee regarding hardship exceptions are final and cannot be appealed.

The letter sent last week by the six Republican senators letter was in response to the comments from Marilyn Tavenner, R.N., chief administrator for CMS at HIMSS14, on the timing of Stage 2 of meaningful use.  At HIMSS, Tavenner said that there would be no added flexibility for upcoming deadlines, as requested by the Ann Arbor, Mich.-based College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) and a number of other stakeholder groups. She did say, however, that the agency would work with organizations to grant hardship exceptions.

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More



KLAS Research: Small Hospitals’ Buying Decisions Impacting EMR Market Share

A new KLAS Research report tracks shifts in electronic medical record (EMR) vendor market share among acute care hospitals, and finds that smaller hospitals are seeking technology solutions that meet their needs and limited budgets, and these contracts are making a mark on the EMR market.

Survey: Majority of Providers Predict Success for New Generic Drug Company, Project Rx

Back in January, four health systems, in consultation with the VA, announced a collaboration to develop a new, not-for-profit generic drug company. A survey has found that 90 percent of providers say they would become customers of the new venture.

Personalized Medicine Awareness Low Among U.S. Adults, Survey Finds

Genetics and personalized medicine are not top of mind for the general public in the U.S., according to a recent survey from GenomeWeb and the Personalized Medicine Coalition.

Industry Organizations Praise Senate Passage of VA Mission Act

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday passed, by a vote of 92-5, a major Veterans Affairs (VA) reform bill that includes health IT-related provisions to improve health data exchange between VA healthcare providers and community care providers.

NIH Issues Funding Announcement for All of Us Genomic Research Program

The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) “All of Us” Research Program has issued a funding announcement for genome centers to generate genotype and whole genome sequence data from participants’ biosamples.

MGMA: Physician Compensation Data Illustrates Nationwide PCP Shortage

Primary care physicians’ compensation rose by more than 10 percent over the past five years, representing an increase which is nearly double that of specialty physicians’ compensation over the same period, according to the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA).