As the Hours Count Down to a Possible DoD Mega-Announcement, Critics Express Skepticism | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

As the Hours Count Down to a Possible DoD Mega-Announcement, Critics Express Skepticism

July 29, 2015
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
As news media reports indicated that the DoD would announce its awarding of an EHR contract worth $10.5 billion late Wednesday, critics express skepticism
Click To View Gallery

As the hours count down to the awarding of what could be one of the biggest contracts in healthcare IT history, storm clouds are already gathering over whatever selection the Department of Defense makes in contracting out the development of a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) to encompass both active military personnel who receive healthcare through the DoD’s care delivery system, and those veterans who receive care through the Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system.

On Wednesday morning, media reports were already indicating that a formal announcement would be made of the selection at 5 PM eastern time Wednesday.

As Amy Ellis Nutt and Amy Brittain reported early Wednesday morning in The Washington Post, “The Pentagon is poised within days to award one of the most coveted health information-technology contracts in history — the first phase of a deal that could ultimately be worth more than $10.5 billion over the 18-year life of the contract. The effort, designed to provide a much-needed upgrade to the current system used by 9.5 million military personnel, including active duty and retirees, is being hotly pursued by three of the heaviest hitters in private industry: Epic Systems, Cerner and Allscripts Healthcare Solutions,” the Post’s reporters stated. And they quoted Christopher Miller, director of the DoD’s section process, as saying, “We are not just buying an off-the-shelf system; we’re really looking to modernize how the department delivers health care,” at the time that the contracted was announced as open for bid.

Nutt and Brittain also wrote this: “Skeptics, however, say choosing any of these three big commercial systems is risky. Doctors and other health-care professionals have complained that these electronic health records systems, as now configured, are clunky to use. The proprietary software means fixes and upgrades can be performed only by the manufacturer. And because none of the systems is Internet-based, sharing information between different systems can be difficult, critics say. Those complaints fuel concerns that the Pentagon will be unable to achieve one of its main goals anytime soon — building a records system that seamlessly interacts with the Veterans Health Administration.”

And the Post reporters quoted Dean Kross, M.D., a Pittsburgh cardiologist who studies healthcare IT, as saying that “None of the three finalists has been able to improve overall outcomes or reduce costs in the private sector despite a track record spanning more than a decade with complete freedom from oversight. How can anyone expect that to change now?” he asked.

Meanwhile, under the headline “Critics Warn of an $11 Billion Pentagon Health Records Fiasco,” Arthur Allen wrote Tuesday in Politico that, “As the Pentagon prepares the biggest federal IT contract announcement since, critics are warning of an even bigger fiasco, a record system that’s obsolete before it’s even finished. They say,” Allen continued, “the project to build a new electronic health record system, estimated to cost $11 billion over a decade, will bloat budgets while hurting the care of millions of service members because their doctors will be unable to smoothly and securely share their medical records across military, Veterans Administration and private health systems. The technical challenges are vast,” Allen pointed out. “The contractor will have to rewire and connect hundreds of hospitals and clinics, serving 10 million service members from the battlefields of Afghanistan to the suburbs of Washington, D.C. And because of its size and reach through the country and the world, the contract could put enormous commercial power in the hands of whichever EHR vendor wins it.”

And he reported that “Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.), a physician who tracks the project, has given up trying to stop the contract, but he promises close appropriations controls. Some former Pentagon IT leaders want a one-year moratorium on the announcement, which is expected as early as this week.” Roe, a senior member of the Veterans Affairs Committee in the House of Representatives,  told Allen that  “I don’t want some other congressman to be sitting where I am 10 years from now and saying, ‘Why can’t the military and the Veterans Administration share records?’”

In his Politico story, Allen also extensively quoted Philip Newcomb, owner of the Seattle-based TSRI Corp., who had  “won over mid-level officials in both agencies with a code-converting program that allowed health records to be read within the Defense and VA systems, offering a possible way to integrate them without buying a new EHR system. His timing was bad, though,” Allen noted. “He presented the promising solution at a February 2014 meeting with officials from the two agencies. They liked it but warned him to stop calling it ‘Plan B,’ which suggested it was an alternative to the DHMSM contract that the military had announced a few months earlier. Three weeks later, the Pentagon canceled the agreement with TSRI. Newcomb believes they feared his solution would draw congressional attention and force the Pentagon to reconsider a joint venture with the VA.”

And, Allen reported, “Newcomb, who claims his system would save the agencies $56 billion over 10 years, has futilely circulated his plan in Congress since then.” He further quoted Newcomb as saying, “They’re making a horrendous mistake, in direct contradiction of what Congress had requested.”

Allen also noted in his report Tuesday that “Investors in the health IT sector also are skeptical. They anticipate that the Pentagon and whichever consortium wins the bid will have trouble agreeing on the details of the EHR implementation,” he wrote, attributing that perspective to Steve Rubis, vice president for digital healthcare at the investment research firm Stifel. “None of the three EHR vendors has had to contend with a client as complex as the Defense Department,” Allen quoted Stifel as saying.

Healthcare Informatics will keep its readers updated on this story as it unfolds.


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More



As an expert informatics in medication build and implementation for both Cerner and Epic, DoD made a correct and good decision to go with Cerner. Epic is nice for 1-2 hospital system but it will face a nightmare for 10+ hospital system for maintenance the medication list alone. However, Cerner can take care of this problem for 100+ or even 1000+ hospital system like Cerner.


Study: EHRs Tied with Lower Hospital Mortality, But Only After Systems Have Matured

Over the past decade, there has been significant national investment in electronic health record (EHR) systems at U.S. hospitals, which was expected to result in improved quality and efficiency of care. However, evidence linking EHR adoption to better care is mixed, according to medical researchers.

Nursing Notes Can Help Predict ICU Survival, Study Finds

Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Ontario have found that sentiments in healthcare providers’ nursing notes can be good indicators of whether intensive care unit (ICU) patients will survive.

Health Catalyst Completes Acquisition of HIE Technology Company Medicity

Salt Lake City-based Health Catalyst, a data analytics company, has completed its acquisition of Medicity, a developer of health information exchange (HIE) technology, and the deal adds data exchange capabilities to Health Catalyst’s data, analytics and decision support solutions.

Advocate Aurora Health, Foxconn Plan Employee Wellness, “Smart City,” and Precision Medicine Collaboration

Wisconsin-based Advocate Aurora Health is partnering with Foxconn Health Technology Business Group, a Taiwanese company, to develop new technology-driven healthcare services and tools.

Healthcare Data Breach Costs Remain Highest at $408 Per Record

The cost of a data breach for healthcare organizations continues to rise, from $380 per record last year to $408 per record this year, as the healthcare industry also continues to incur the highest cost for data breaches compared to any other industry, according to a new study from IBM Security and the Ponemon Institute.

Morris Leaves ONC to Lead VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization

Genevieve Morris, who has been detailed to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from her position as the principal deputy national coordinator for the Department of Health and Human Services, will move over full time to lead the newly establishment VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization.