ONC Report Points Finger at Vendors, Providers for Information Blocking | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

ONC Report Points Finger at Vendors, Providers for Information Blocking

April 10, 2015
by Gabriel Perna
| Reprints

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) released a report this week to Congress on health information blocking.

The report’s authors and researchers detailed several examples of electronic health record (EHR) developers and health systems blocking health information sharing between each other. The act of information blocking occurs when an entity or person knowingly and unreasonably interferes with the exchange of electronic health information. Examples of this are charging prices and fees for data exchange; creating terms of a contract that restrict individuals access to their health information; developing health IT in a non-standard way that dissuades information sharing; and developing health IT in a way that locks in information.

The report lists anecdotal evidence that suggests EHR application developers are breaking several of the rules in this regard. Using interviews with people at regional extension centers (RECs), the authors detailed complaints from industry sources on how developers are charging fees that make it cost-prohibitive to send, receive, or export electronic health information stored in EHRs. Some EHR developers even charge a substantial transaction fee any time a user sends, receives, or queries a patient’s electronic health information, the report says. The variation in prices reported to ONC suggests that some are taking advantage of the situation.

Moreover, complaints over information blocking usually come about because of contractual terms, technology design decisions, and other business practices. The report says many EHR developers purposely prohibit customers from selecting an ONC-certified health information service provider (HISP) of their choosing and use only the developer’s HISP. This is a problem because that prevents end users from meeting the technical requirements to exchange with other providers, the report says.

The report does not acquit providers from information blocking. It says that a common charge is that hospitals and health systems engage in information blocking to maintain their market dominance.

In a blog announcing the availability of the report, Karen DeSalvo, M.D. National Coordinator for Health IT, noted that evidence of information blocking is hard to analyze. “The full extent of the information blocking problem is difficult to assess, primarily because health IT developers impose contractual restrictions that prohibit customers from reporting or even discussing costs, restrictions, and other relevant details. Still, from the evidence available, it is readily apparent that some providers and developers are engaging in information blocking. And for reasons discussed in our report, this behavior may become more prevalent as technology and the need to exchange electronic health information continue to evolve and mature,” she writes.

The ONC report includes several suggestions to overcome information blocking. This includes proposing transparency obligations for health IT developers that require disclosure of restrictions and costs associated with interoperability, proposing certification requirements monitor health IT capabilities of applications, creating a governance framework for health information exchange that establishes principles on business, technical, and organizational practices related to interoperability and information sharing; and much more.

Moreover, the authors of the report and the ONC say that preventing information will require Congressional intervention. It does not specifically offer any suggestions though. The report came about after a request from Congress to produce a report on information blocking in healthcare and create a strategy to address it.

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

Advocate Aurora Health, Foxconn Plan Employee Wellness, “Smart City,” and Precision Medicine Collaboration

Wisconsin-based Advocate Aurora Health is partnering with Foxconn Health Technology Business Group, a Taiwanese company, to develop new technology-driven healthcare services and tools.

Healthcare Data Breach Costs Remain Highest at $408 Per Record

The cost of a data breach for healthcare organizations continues to rise, from $380 per record last year to $408 per record this year, as the healthcare industry also continues to incur the highest cost for data breaches compared to any other industry, according to a new study from IBM Security and the Ponemon Institute.

Morris Leaves ONC to Lead VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization

Genevieve Morris, who has been detailed to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from her position as the principal deputy national coordinator for the Department of Health and Human Services, will move over full time to lead the newly establishment VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization.

Cedars-Sinai Accelerator Program Presents Fourth Class of Startups

The Cedars-Sinai Accelerator, a program that helps entrepreneurs bring their innovative technology products to market, has brought in nine more health tech startups as part of its fourth class.

DirectTrust Adds Five Board Members

DirectTrust, a nonprofit organization that support health information exchange, announced the appointment of five new executives to its board of directors.

Analysis: Many States Continue to Have Restrictive Telemedicine Policies

State Medicaid programs are evolving to accelerate the adoption of telemedicine models, this evolution is occurring more quickly in some states than others, according to a recent analysis by Manatt Health.