Issue Brief: ACO Participation Can Increase MACRA Performance Scores | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Issue Brief: ACO Participation Can Increase MACRA Performance Scores

March 30, 2017
by Heather Landi
| Reprints

With the first performance year for the new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) underway, eligible clinicians must strategize payment implications under the program. According to a new issue brief from Caravan Health, participating in a Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organization (ACO) could potentially help physicians earn up to a 25 percent positive Medicare payment adjustment in 2018 under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act's Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).

Caravan Health, a Kansas City-based population health management company, examined the impact of ACO participation on MIPS payments for all eligible clinicians.

According to the issue brief, unlike the Physicians Quality Reporting System, Meaningful Use and the Value-Based Modifier, MIPS places the performance of each clinician on a curve, and adjusts payments based on their precise location in the distribution compared to others.

In the issue brief, titled “Impact of ACOs on MIPS Payments for All Eligible Clinicians,” Lynn Barr, CEO of Caravan Health, and LeeAnn Hastings, Compliance Officer for 23 Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs, compare MIPS payment adjustments of ACO participants versus non-ACO participants.

“The brief illustrates that Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) participation will enhance MIPS performance and increase the likelihood of receiving the exceptional performance bonuses. Exceptional performance bonuses are only available the first five years of MIPS and, depending upon the number of exceptional performers, could receive up to ten percent in addition to the maximum positive payment adjustment, which is up to three times the penalty for the first five years of the program,” Barr and Hastings wrote in the brief.

“Taking into account the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) scaling factor and the exceptional performance bonus, a top-performing practice could theoretically earn up to a 25 percent payment adjustment in the 2018 performance year,” Barr and Hastings wrote.

 According to Hastings, “MACRA requires that 30 percent of the MIPS score is based on Resource Utilization. Track 1 ACO participants, however, are held accountable for cost in their ACO and not MIPS. As a result, Track 1 ACO participants can more easily achieve high scores compared to other MIPS participants, increasing the likelihood of avoiding MIPS penalties and earning the exceptional performance bonus.”

 To predict MIPS bonuses, Barr emphasizes that clinicians must know both their performance score and estimate the score of the rest of the providers in the MIPS pool. Up to 40 percent of eligible clinicians in the pool are expected to be participants in Track 1 Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs. Those ACOs will receive special scoring causing most other MIPS-eligible clinicians to receive lower adjustments in comparison, she stated.

“High performing MIPS participants with average costs will score 15 percent lower than equivalent MIPS participants that are in a risk-free Track 1 ACO and may find it difficult to earn the exceptional performance bonus. High performing MIPS participants with high costs will score 30 percent lower than equivalent MIPS participants that are in a risk-free Track 1 ACO and may face MIPS penalties. Hospitals can avoid hundreds of thousands of dollars in downward MIPS adjustments, and potentially earn the exceptional performance bonus by enrolling in an ACO to take advantage of special scoring for their clinicians,” the authors wrote.

“Small practices should consider joining an ACO to avoid penalties for generally lower scores due to lack of infrastructure, and providers in rural areas may want to join ACOs to avoid MIPS penalties due to their higher cost structures. Community hospitals can earn high bonuses and support their community physicians, particularly specialists, by enrolling them in their ACO, protecting their incomes and reducing their administrative burden,” Barr wrote.

 The full brief can be viewed here.

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More



Dignity Health, UCSF Health Partner to Improve the Digital Patient Experience

Dignity Health and UCSF Health are collaborating to develop a digital engagement platform that officials believe will provide information and access to patients when and where they need it as they navigate primary and preventive care, as well as more acute or specialty care.

Report: Digital Health VC Funding Surges to Record $4.9 Billion in 2018

Global venture capital funding for digital health companies in the first half of 2018 was 22 percent higher year-over-year (YoY) with a record $4.9 billion raised in 383 deals compared to the $4 billion in 359 deals in the same time period last year, according to Mercom Capital Group’s latest report.

ONC Roundup: Senior Leadership Changes Spark Questions

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has continued to experience changes within its upper leadership, leading some folks to again ponder what the health IT agency’s role will be moving forward.

Media Report: Walmart Hires Former Humana Executive to Run Health Unit

Reigniting speculation that Walmart and insurer Humana are exploring ways to forge a closer partnership, Walmart Inc. has hired a Humana veteran to run its health care business, according to a report from Bloomberg.

Value-Based Care Shift Has Halted, Study Finds

A new study of 451 physicians and health plan executives suggests that progress toward value-based care has stalled. In fact, it may have even taken a step backward over the past year, the research revealed.

Study: EHRs Tied with Lower Hospital Mortality, But Only After Systems Have Matured

Over the past decade, there has been significant national investment in electronic health record (EHR) systems at U.S. hospitals, which was expected to result in improved quality and efficiency of care. However, evidence linking EHR adoption to better care is mixed, according to medical researchers.