Survey: Only 11 Percent of Physicians Feel Positively About Value-Based Payment Models | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Survey: Only 11 Percent of Physicians Feel Positively About Value-Based Payment Models

May 8, 2017
by Heather Landi
| Reprints

A survey by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) found that almost half of physicians are split on their feelings around the shift towards value-based payment models. 

Value-based healthcare is a hot topic for many medical groups and MGMA wanted to get a pulse on the matter from its member base. In a May 2 MGMA Stat poll, only 11 percent of physicians reported having positive sentiment around the shift towards value-based payment models, and 49 percent of physicians are split. The poll found that 40 percent of physicians have negative sentiment around the shift towards value-based payment models.

David Gans, MGMA senior fellow, industry affairs, says that he is not surprised by the results of the survey. “Physicians are uncertain how value-based payment is going to affect their practices and their patients. They are familiar with fee-for-service, and they have created the internal systems that you need to manage patients in that payment environment, and how to manage your payment. You’ve got billing systems that are optimized around identifying what the appropriate procedures are and billing those procedures and being paid. When you start looking at some of the mechanisms for value-based payment, we’re looking at either taking more risk at the practice or having certain types of bonusing systems based on patient outcomes or population health, and that’s uncertainty,” he says.

Gans continues, “A lot of physicians, to be honest, have had less than good experience with relationships with health maintenance organizations or other insurers, so there’s not necessarily a lot of trust in how the system is going to be implemented. So you have uncertainty about the unknown, versus what you know very well.”

Further, Gans says the survey results indicate that about half of physicians have mixed feelings on value-based care. “From a physician perspective, the concept of value-based payment is good. The implementation, on the other hand, is where the uncertainty is. So I think what we’re seeing is that physicians think that if properly reimbursed, this could be very positive, however, there is uncertainty about how it will be implemented.”

Moving forward, as the healthcare industry continues to push further into value-based care and value-based payment initiatives, Gans asserts that insurers, whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), or commercial insurers, need to work more closely with physicians on developing definitive standards for evaluating patient outcomes and cost, and also should provide feedback to physicians to better manage costs. Value-based care and value-based payment programs are “really a partnership between the insurer and the doctor for information exchange that can help lower those costs,” he says.

 

 

 

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

Study: EHRs Tied with Lower Hospital Mortality, But Only After Systems Have Matured

Over the past decade, there has been significant national investment in electronic health record (EHR) systems at U.S. hospitals, which was expected to result in improved quality and efficiency of care. However, evidence linking EHR adoption to better care is mixed, according to medical researchers.

Nursing Notes Can Help Predict ICU Survival, Study Finds

Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Ontario have found that sentiments in healthcare providers’ nursing notes can be good indicators of whether intensive care unit (ICU) patients will survive.

Health Catalyst Completes Acquisition of HIE Technology Company Medicity

Salt Lake City-based Health Catalyst, a data analytics company, has completed its acquisition of Medicity, a developer of health information exchange (HIE) technology, and the deal adds data exchange capabilities to Health Catalyst’s data, analytics and decision support solutions.

Advocate Aurora Health, Foxconn Plan Employee Wellness, “Smart City,” and Precision Medicine Collaboration

Wisconsin-based Advocate Aurora Health is partnering with Foxconn Health Technology Business Group, a Taiwanese company, to develop new technology-driven healthcare services and tools.

Healthcare Data Breach Costs Remain Highest at $408 Per Record

The cost of a data breach for healthcare organizations continues to rise, from $380 per record last year to $408 per record this year, as the healthcare industry also continues to incur the highest cost for data breaches compared to any other industry, according to a new study from IBM Security and the Ponemon Institute.

Morris Leaves ONC to Lead VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization

Genevieve Morris, who has been detailed to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from her position as the principal deputy national coordinator for the Department of Health and Human Services, will move over full time to lead the newly establishment VA Office of Electronic Health Record Modernization.