Senators Request Clarity on mHealth App Regulation from FDA | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Senators Request Clarity on mHealth App Regulation from FDA

March 19, 2014
by Gabriel Perna
| Reprints

A group of U.S. Senators have sent a letter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner, Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. seeking further clarity and transparency on how the agency plans on regulating medical mobile health (mHealth) apps.

Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn), Mark Warner (D-Va), and Richard Burr (R-NC) sent the letter to Dr. Hamburg, asking for further clarification  for medical software application developers. Referring to the FDA's final guidance over mHealth apps, the Senators note that the agency used a risk-based approach in defining what it considers to be a mobile medical application, focused on high-risk medical software in particular. The Senators say a large number of apps could be actively regulated under this definition and more transparency is required for developers.

"While the FDA’s final guidance has provided clarity on the agency’s approach to regulation of mobile medical applications, we believe more transparency is needed to avoid stakeholder confusion over how a wider range of medical software might be appropriately regulated," the Senators wrote in the letter.

The Senators include a series of questions within the letter that it requests the FDA answer within three weeks of its receipt. Some of those questions include:

  • Compared to current FDA guidance, what impact would Congress establishing categories of medical software in legislation have on the FDA’s oversight of medical mobile applications?
  • What role, if any, can statutory definitions play to clarify any uncertainty with respect to assigning risk level to medical software?

  • How is the FDA determining what types of medical software updates, even minor updates, change the function of or add a function to the medical software and would require FDA review?

  • How has the FDA been coordinating with the Office of the National Coordinator and Federal Communications Commission to address the recent FDA Safety and Innovation Act working group’s concerns over interoperability?

The letter, in its entirety, can be read by clicking the link below.

 

Read the source article at Michael Bennet

Topics

News

Survey: Health IT is Underfunded at European Healthcare Organizations

Health IT is not sufficiently funded and supported at most European healthcare provider organizations, according to an eHealth survey from HIMSS Analytics.

Only 27 Percent of Healthcare Security Execs Confident about Safeguarding Patient Data

Just 27 percent of healthcare security executives have confidence they can safeguard patients’ medical records, even though nearly 80 percent are required to comply with government regulations, according to a recent survey from cybersecurity solutions provider Radware.

FDA Approves First Telehealth-Enabled Cochlear Impact

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first telehealth option to program cochlear implants remotely.

$1 Billion Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against eClinicalWorks

A $1 billion class action lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York alleges that electronic health records vendor eClinicalWorks failed “millions of patients by failing to maintain the integrity of patients’ records.”

HHS Secretary Names Three Members to HIT Advisory Committee

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Acting Secretary Eric D. Hargan named three members to the Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC), established by the 21st Century Cures Act.

Survey Gauges Health System Preparedness for Quality Payment Program

A new survey indicates that most healthcare organizations are relying on EHRs and population health management solutions for quality performance management. However, survey respondents also report low satisfaction with these solutions, which puts organizations at risk of falling short of their goals for maximizing payment incentives.