Study Reveals Provider Concerns with Value-Based Payment Models | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Study Reveals Provider Concerns with Value-Based Payment Models

May 21, 2014
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Although three-quarters of providers currently participate in at least one value-based payment model, fewer than 30 percent believe they offer a good level of reward for the risk, according to a study recently published by Availity, a Jacksonville, Fla.-based provider of healthcare business solutions.

Additionally, 60 percent of respondents expect value-based payment models to become the dominant payment model. The “Provider Attitudes Toward Value-Based Payment Models” study highlights feedback from more than 500 physician practice and hospital-based professionals nationwide.

Managing value-based payment models alongside existing fee-for-service arrangements, and across numerous health plans, is creating issues that range from accurate revenue forecasting to workflow integration challenges, the study found. According to one physician practice respondent, “The administrative complexity of administering these plans is likely to be costly. The unpredictability of the revenue stream is likely going to make administering some of these plans not worth the cost.”

More than 80 percent of respondents cited the need for additional staff and time to manage value-based models that represent less than 20 percent of their current revenues. The need for meaningful workflow tools and real-time information access to help avoid creating expensive, manual processes was named by more than 75 percent as a key factor to value-based payment model success.

“The healthcare revenue cycle is incredibly complicated and it’s undergoing a transformation,” Russ Thomas, Availity CEO, said in a statement. “In addition to the challenges presented by rising patient financial responsibility and ongoing pressure to reduce operating costs, payment reform initiatives are driving the shift from fee-for-service to fee-for-value. But unless we equip providers—and health plans— with the right tools and access to the information they need, we risk further complicating an already complex and fragmented system.”

Get the latest information on Finance and Revenues and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More



Former Michigan Governor to Serve as Chair of DRIVE Health

Former Michigan Governor John Engler will serve as chair of the DRIVE Health Initiative, a campaign aimed at accelerating the U.S. health system's transition to value-based care.

NJ Medical Group Launches Statewide HIE, OneHealth New Jersey

The Medical Society of New Jersey (MSNJ) recently launched OneHealth New Jersey, a statewide health information exchange (HIE) that is now live.

Survey: 70% of Providers Using Off-Premises Computing for Some Applications

A survey conducted by KLAS Research found that 70 percent of healthcare organizations have moved at least some applications or IT infrastructure off-premises.

AMIA Warns of Tax Bill’s Impact on Graduate School Programs in Informatics

Provisions in the Republican tax bill that would count graduate student tuition waivers as taxable income would have detrimental impacts on the viability of fields such as informatics, according to the American Medical Informatics Association.

Appalachia Project to Study Relationship Between Increased Broadband Access, Improved Cancer Care

The Federal Communications Commission and the National Cancer Institute have joined forces to focus on how increasing broadband access and adoption in rural areas can improve the lives of rural cancer patients.

Survey: By 2019, 60% of Medicare Revenues will be Tied to Risk

Medical groups and health systems that are members of AMGA (the American Medical Group Association) expect that nearly 60 percent of their revenues from Medicare will be from risk-based products by 2019, according to the results from a recent survey.