Study: Sharing Visit Notes with Patients Improves Patient Satisfaction, Trust and Safety | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Study: Sharing Visit Notes with Patients Improves Patient Satisfaction, Trust and Safety

May 24, 2016
by Heather Landi
| Reprints
Click To View Gallery

Improving transparency between physicians and their patients by allowing patients to view their visit notes in their health records can improve patient satisfaction, trust and safety, according to a recently published study.

Researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center examined the impact of physicians sharing visit notes with patients on the physician-patient relationship as part of a survey, the results of which were published in BMJ Quality and Safety.

According to the study authors, while patient advocates and safety experts encourage adoption of transparent health records, “sceptics worry that shared notes may offend patients, erode trust or promote defensive medicine.”

“As electronic health records disseminate, such disparate views fuel policy debates about risks and benefits of sharing visit notes with patients through portals,” the study authors wrote.

The researchers surveyed 99 volunteer physicians at three U.S. sites who participated in OpenNotes as well as 4,592 patients who read at least one note and submitted a survey.

The OpenNotes movement allows patients electronic access to their provider’s notes in their medical records. The OpenNotes initiative, which started with 20,000 patients in 2010, now includes more than 5 million patients. Its goal is to expand to 50 million patients within three years.

The researchers found that patients read notes to be better informed and out of curiosity. About one-third of patients read them to check accuracy, according to the survey results.

In total, 7 percent of patients reported contacting their doctor's office about their note. Of these, 29 percent perceived an error, and the majority (85 percent) were satisfied with its resolution. Sharing visit notes did not negatively impact how patients perceive their physicians. In fact, 37 percent of patients who viewed at least one share reported feeling better about their doctor, while 62 percent reported feeling the same.

The survey results also indicated that patients who were older (>63), male, non-white, had fair/poor self-reported health or had less formal education were more likely to report feeling better about their doctor.

The feedback from patients contrasts with what physicians anticipated. Among physicians participating in the survey, 26 percent said they anticipated documentation errors, and 44 percent expected that patients would disagree with notes. After a year in the OpenNotes program, 53 percent of physicians believed patient satisfaction increased, and 51 percent thought patients trusted them more. None of the participating physicians reported ordering more tests or referrals.

“Despite concerns about errors, offending language or defensive practice, transparent notes overall did not harm the patient–doctor relationship. Rather, doctors and patients perceived relational benefits,’ the study authors wrote.

And the study authors also concluded, “Traditionally more vulnerable populations—non-white, those with poorer self-reported health and those with fewer years of formal education—may be particularly likely to feel better about their doctor after reading their notes. Further informing debate about OpenNotes, the findings suggest transparent records may improve patient satisfaction, trust and safety.”

 

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

ONC Roundup: Senior Leadership Changes Spark Questions

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has continued to experience changes within its upper leadership, leading some folks to again ponder what the health IT agency’s role will be moving forward.

Media Report: Walmart Hires Former Humana Executive to Run Health Unit

Reigniting speculation that Walmart and insurer Humana are exploring ways to forge a closer partnership, Walmart Inc. has hired a Humana veteran to run its health care business, according to a report from Bloomberg.

Value-Based Care Shift Has Halted, Study Finds

A new study of 451 physicians and health plan executives suggests that progress toward value-based care has stalled. In fact, it may have even taken a step backward over the past year, the research revealed.

Study: EHRs Tied with Lower Hospital Mortality, But Only After Systems Have Matured

Over the past decade, there has been significant national investment in electronic health record (EHR) systems at U.S. hospitals, which was expected to result in improved quality and efficiency of care. However, evidence linking EHR adoption to better care is mixed, according to medical researchers.

Nursing Notes Can Help Predict ICU Survival, Study Finds

Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Ontario have found that sentiments in healthcare providers’ nursing notes can be good indicators of whether intensive care unit (ICU) patients will survive.

Health Catalyst Completes Acquisition of HIE Technology Company Medicity

Salt Lake City-based Health Catalyst, a data analytics company, has completed its acquisition of Medicity, a developer of health information exchange (HIE) technology, and the deal adds data exchange capabilities to Health Catalyst’s data, analytics and decision support solutions.