Survey: Providers Embrace Telemedicine, Despite Obstacles | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Survey: Providers Embrace Telemedicine, Despite Obstacles

November 11, 2014
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Nine out of 10 providers are pursuing telemedicine programs, according to a survey of healthcare executives by law firm Foley & Lardner LLP.

Telemedicine is not a distant possibility; it is here and in play now, the report concluded. Healthcare leaders said that their organizations are committed to continuing to implement telemedicine programs, even as they face challenges such as getting doctors to buy into the programs and insurers to pay for them. Why? For the majority of respondents, it’s simple — they believe telemedicine will help them keep patients healthier. Most also say that offering meaningful telemedicine services will be critical to the future success of their organizations. Additionally:

  • Eighty-four percent of respondents felt that the development of telemedicine services is either very important (52 percent) or important (32 percent) to their organizations. Virtually none said they considered the technology to be unimportant (3 percent).
  • While just 6 percent of respondents categorized their telemedicine programs as “mature,” only 8 percent said they had none at all. The remainders of responses are clustered somewhere in the middle: 34 percent are under consideration or in development, 18 percent are in the optimization phase, and the remaining 36 percent are being piloted or implemented.
  • A majority of respondents already offer remote monitoring (64 percent), store and forward technology (54 percent), and real-time interaction capabilities (52 percent). Additionally, 39 percent say they have services that qualify as mHealth—patient-driven apps and online portals.

For executives under pressure to find cost-effective methods of engagement with their patients, telemedicine offers ways to streamline operations and create multiple touch points with patients, making it one of the most reliable methods for transitioning to a post-Affordable Care Act, forward-looking reimbursement model, the report found.

  •  Executives are most excited about telemedicine’s potential to keep patients healthier. Half of respondents (50 percent) ranked improving the quality of care as their number one rationale for implementing telemedicine. Another 18 percent were most excited about reaching new patients.
  • Despite the cost savings tied to telemedicine, healthcare leaders do not expect an immediate economic return on investment. A minimal percentage of respondents ranked the potential for increased revenue/ profitability (11 percent) and getting a jump on the competition (4 percent) as their top motivators.   

Although leaders fully endorsed the robust prospects of telemedicine, they were less confident about its immediate adoption. The widespread use of telemedicine requires doctors to be willing to transform the look and feel of the traditional, in-person patient visit. Meanwhile, the customary fee-for-service environment makes it challenging to be paid for medicine practiced outside the traditional spheres of interaction.

  • Being paid for telemedicine remains an uphill battle, as indicated by 41 percent of respondents who said they are not reimbursed at all for telemedicine services, and 21 percent who reported receiving lower rates from managed care companies for telemedicine than for in-person care.
  • Aside from reimbursement challenges, 48 percent of executives say they are more concerned with convincing doctors about the credibility of telemedicine than they are with convincing doctors that they will be adequately compensated for practicing it (36 percent).
  • This uncertain environment led 87 percent of respondents to report that they do not believe a majority of their patients will be using any of their organization’s telemedicine services three years from now. Almost one-quarter said they anticipated fewer than 10 percent of their patients utilizing their organization’s services.

 

Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

KLAS Research: Small Hospitals’ Buying Decisions Impacting EMR Market Share

A new KLAS Research report tracks shifts in electronic medical record (EMR) vendor market share among acute care hospitals, and finds that smaller hospitals are seeking technology solutions that meet their needs and limited budgets, and these contracts are making a mark on the EMR market.

Survey: Majority of Providers Predict Success for New Generic Drug Company, Project Rx

Back in January, four health systems, in consultation with the VA, announced a collaboration to develop a new, not-for-profit generic drug company. A survey has found that 90 percent of providers say they would become customers of the new venture.

Personalized Medicine Awareness Low Among U.S. Adults, Survey Finds

Genetics and personalized medicine are not top of mind for the general public in the U.S., according to a recent survey from GenomeWeb and the Personalized Medicine Coalition.

Industry Organizations Praise Senate Passage of VA Mission Act

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday passed, by a vote of 92-5, a major Veterans Affairs (VA) reform bill that includes health IT-related provisions to improve health data exchange between VA healthcare providers and community care providers.

NIH Issues Funding Announcement for All of Us Genomic Research Program

The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) “All of Us” Research Program has issued a funding announcement for genome centers to generate genotype and whole genome sequence data from participants’ biosamples.

MGMA: Physician Compensation Data Illustrates Nationwide PCP Shortage

Primary care physicians’ compensation rose by more than 10 percent over the past five years, representing an increase which is nearly double that of specialty physicians’ compensation over the same period, according to the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA).