Skip to content Skip to navigation

EMR Spending Surge Forecasted

February 15, 2011
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
Research report looks at clinical IT spending going forward

A report recently released by the Framingham, Mass.-based advisory services and market research firm IDC Health Insights has projected spending on both ambulatory and inpatient EMR software to nearly double between 2009 and 2015, driven forward strongly and primarily by the stimulus monies to be made available through the federal American Reinvestment and Recovery Act/Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (ARRA-HITECH). Using a double-foundation methodology based on both a survey of healthcare IT leaders from provider organizations, and on an analysis of healthcare IT vendor revenues, the report found the following :

  • Ambulatory EMR software spending by all types of providers was $633.5 million in 2009, and is expected to grow to $1,406.9 million ($1.4 billion) by 2015.
  • Inpatient EMR software spending by all types of providers was $1,343 million ($1.343 billion) in 2009, and is expected to grow to $2,382.8 million (nearly $2.4 billion) by 2015.
  • Total EMR software spending by all types of providers was $1,976.5 million (nearly $2 billion) in 2009, and is expected to grow to $3,789.7 million (nearly $3.8 billion) in 2015.

Further, the report found the following, in surveying healthcare IT leaders regarding the effect that ARRA-HITECH was having on their EMR deployment plans:

  • 12.6% of respondents said they were “aggressively” accelerating EMR deployment in order to maximize potential HITECH incentive payments
  • 31% of respondents were accelerating EMR deployment to qualify for HITECH payment
  • 19.5% of respondents reported no change in timelines for their EMR deployments in order to qualify for HITECH incentive payments
  • Another 19.5% had already implemented an EMR, and reported that HITECH would have no influence on their organizations
  • 17.2% said they were not sure what effect HITECH might have on their organizations

Judy Hanover, research director at IDC Insights, and the lead author of the report, titled “Business Strategy: U.S. Electronic Health and Medical records 2009-2015—Meaningful Use Spending Forecast and Analysis,” concludes the report by saying that “The incentives provided by ARRA as well as the future penalties for non-implementers have clearly tipped the balance toward investment and driven healthcare providers along a path to implement these technologies at record levels.” Hanover spoke recently with HCI Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland regarding the findings of the report, and her perspectives on EMR/EHR spending in the next several years.

Healthcare Informatics: How did you derive the money numbers in your organization’s report?

Judy Hanover: IDC publishes an IT spending guide for healthcare—it’s a top-down view of the entire healthcare IT industry; it’s a total look at the IT spending picture in the U.S., and we also do other ones for other countries. We started with that document, and did an extensive survey of over 200 provider organizations about their spending sentiments, what they were currently spending on, and so on. We used that survey, our top-down methodology, and a bottom-up analysis of vendor revenues, in terms of license and maintenance revenues, as well as revenues from software as a service, to derive the figures. We feel the numbers we derived are strong numbers.

Judy Hanover

HCI: Can you comment on the considerable growth you’re projecting?

Hanover: Sure. Both inpatient and ambulatory EMR spending are both growing at about 11 to 12 percent annually. And we’re seeing investment and growth in healthcare IT of about 6 percent per year; and these particular application activities are really driven by meaningful use, as well as healthcare reform—many of the improvements and efficiencies that providers will have to make under healthcare reform really start with these applications. And we did run a branch office survey in which we asked people, if they weren’t investing in EMR, why not? And the vast majority were physicians about to retire.