One-on-One with Scott Wallace

April 9, 2008
| Reprints
After stepping down as president and CEO of the National Alliance for Health Information Technology last week after five years of service, what’s next for Scott Wallace?


To some, this news came as a surprise when Wallace announced his resignation last week, but for Wallace, the move was a long time coming. Recently, HCI Associate Editor Kate Huvane had a chance to chat with Wallace about what motivated his decision to leave the National Alliance for Health Information Technology, the most important goals he was able to accomplish during his tenure, how he plans to fill his days (golf, unfortunately, is not on his rather busy agenda), the issues that need to be addressed in the healthcare IT industry, and the role he wants CIOs to assume in the process.

KH: The announcement that you were stepping down officially hit last Wednesday (March 26), and it was one of those e-mails that really generated a lot of discussion. I can imagine that you’ve received quite a few messages from media outlets and colleagues.

SW: Yes, definitely. That’s been most of the last few days for me. I realized when I left the Alliance that I had 1,400 names in my contacts list so there were a lot of people to notify — and I’ve discovered that Gmail will only you send 500 e-mails a day. I’ve had to do all this work to clean up my list, but it’s been worth it. The number of emails and calls that I’ve gotten from people has really been wonderful. The sentiments have made me feel very good.

KH: I’m sure that the decision to leave was not an easy one for you. What were the primary motivating factors?

SW: It sounds cliché, but it really is the right time for me to go and do some new things. I think that we, as a field, have moved far enough that we really can see that health IT is not single-handedly going to save the world. But it is a facet of what has to be done more broadly in the transformation of care. I want to move back into the for-profit sector because I just find that to be a more comfortable space. But also, I want to be able to address broader issues around the restructuring of healthcare that I really couldn’t do within a single-issue organization.

KH: So you felt that you had done all the work you could in this particular capacity?

SW: Yes. The Alliance was really built around the idea of engaging senior leaders from all of the different healthcare sectors in the issue of healthcare IT. If you go back five years, the need was to mainstream the issue. I used to joke that five years ago, a lot of healthcare leaders couldn’t spell healthcare IT if you spotted them the word ‘healthcare.’ And now, it’s something that I think everybody really understands. The centrality of information management in care is no longer epiphanous. What has to happen now is a lot of very detailed work that isn’t at the senior level and also pits one group against the other and asks questions like who’s going to pay? Who’s going to compromise? Who’s going to sacrifice? My feeling was that didn’t play to the skill set that I had in running the Alliance. That I couldn’t be as effective in that environment as I had been in the last five years, so it was time to go into a different place to do some of that.

KH: What was it like to have such a key leadership role during a time when health IT was blowing up and really hitting the mainstream? I would think it was very exciting but also very exhausting.

SW: It was exhausting. I completely wore myself out a couple years ago and had a heart attack. It definitely was an all-consuming kind of a thing, but it was exciting. You get a limited number of opportunities in life to really change the world, and I think that there were some real world-changing things that happened in the health IT space. We got the certification commission going. We really mainstreamed people’s understanding of healthcare IT. We got the commission report out there. It was all really significant stuff that was only feasible because it was such a tumultuous time.

KH: When you look back at what you were able to do during your tenure, which accomplishments give you the most satisfaction?

SW: I think the CSI report (Ending the Document Game: Connecting and Transforming Your Healthcare through Information Technology) was huge because that remains one of the most cogent frameworks for enabling connected information. I also think the certification commission is a tremendous achievement for which I deserve nearly no credit. The credit for that really goes to Linda Kloss, David Brailer and Mark Leavitt. They are the force that has made that what it is.

KH: And also, of course, rebuilding the New Orleans healthcare system.

SW: The work we did in New Orleans is really important and was really formative for me in terms of contemplating the next step. The issue in New Orleans is not health information; the issue is: what is the appropriate structure of a care delivery system? And the more I started getting into that, the more I was fascinated by it, but also the more that I felt limited because we were chartered around a single, very specific issue.

Page
of 2Next