On the surface, the idea of getting clinicians to interact with patients on social media comes with much apprehension and worry. HIPAA privacy laws are at the forefront of these concerns, and additionally, doctors have to be very careful about how they construct responses on a social networking forum for patients who might not even be their own. After all, this wouldn’t be the first time the healthcare industry has dealt with social media and privacy concerns.
So you can forgive me for having my doubts leading up to a conference call last week with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in New York City. As my colleague, Senior Editor Gabe Perna, wrote about back in October, HSS has been using Facebook chats to convey health information and raise awareness of lupus, an autoimmune disease. Last year, the hospital joined forces with a community-based lupus organization, S.L.E. Lupus Foundation, to publicize the chat, and subsequently tripled the number of participants. The chat went from 2,280 users and 60 questions in May 2012 to 6,624 people and 162 questions.
The last chat in November reached more than 7,600 people and involved more than 125 participants with questions and comments, and during the week of the Lupus Chat there was an increase of 271 new Facebook likes for the HSS page. According to the Lupus Center of Excellence at Special Surgery, the Facebook chats raised awareness, helped them reach a wider audience, and perhaps most importantly, allowed for interaction between patients and providers.
Still though, even upon hearing this, I was unsure. Many doctors still cling to pen and paper, and are most comfortable using e-technology to communicate with each other—not with patients. How would these physicians adapt outside their comfort zone? Would patients take the information the wrong way, and further, would the anonymity that comes with online communication lead to more messiness?
Jane Salmon, M.D., director of the Lupus Center of Excellence and HSS rheumatologist, makes it clear that the physicians, nurses, and social workers who participate in these chats aren’t delivering healthcare, but instead giving patients guidance about where they can seek care and information from. “We’re not delivering care to them; we don’t know them, so we can’t do that,” Salmon bluntly told me in the interview last week. She added that some patients will ask about unusual alternatives to normal treatments or unconventional ideas they may have read somewhere, so the chats also serve as a way to get rid of disinformation, with all sorts of bad information on the web.
Also On Healthcare-Informatics...