Skip to content Skip to navigation

BREAKING NEWS: CMS Proposes Extension of MU Stage 2

December 6, 2013
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced that Stage 2 of meaningful use will be extended through 2016, and Stage 3 will begin in 2017 for providers who have completed at least two years in Stage 2, in what is an incredibly significant reverse of position from the agency.

In a CMS statement, Robert Tagalicod, director, Office of E-Health Standards and Services, CMS, and Jacob Reider, M.D., acting national coordinator for health information technology for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), said the goal of this change is two-fold: first, to allow CMS and ONC to focus efforts on the successful implementation of the enhanced patient engagement, interoperability and health information exchange requirements in Stage 2; and second, to utilize data from Stage 2 participation to inform policy decisions for Stage 3.

The phased approach to program participation helps providers move from creating information in Stage 1, to exchanging health information in Stage 2, to focusing on improved outcomes in Stage 3. "This approach has allowed us to support an aggressive yet smart transition for providers," read the CMS statement.

This new proposed timeline tracks ongoing conversations CMS and ONC have had with providers, consumers, healthcare associations, EHR developers, and other stakeholders in the healthcare industry. This timeline allows for enhanced program analysis of Stage 2 data to inform to the improvements in care delivery outcomes in Stage 3, according to the CMS statement.

Despite many associations pushing for a Stage 2 extension, as recently as two weeks ago at the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium (AIMA), ONC leaders said changes to Stage 2 of meaningful use would be unlikely.

At that time, Jodi Daniel, ONC’s director of the office of policy planning, said, “We have heard from stakeholders about concerns, and we are looking at timelines. I don’t have magic dice to talk about chances of anything. “She added that any change would be up to CMS, not ONC, and for CMS to change the timeline would require a regulatory change.

Healthcare Informatics will keep you updated as more details from this story emerge. 

Get the latest information on Meaningful Use and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More

Topics

News

CMS Looks to Increase Patient Engagement with New Models

The Centers for Medicare & and Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced two new models from the CMS Innovation Center (CMMI) that will aim to increase patient engagement in care decisions by putting more information in the hands of Medicare beneficiaries.

Medtronic, Fitbit Integrating Health and Activity Data for Diabetes Management

Fitness wearables company Fitbit, based in San Francisco, and Dublin, Ireland-based Medtronic, a medical device company, have teamed up to integrate health and activity tracking for patients living with diabetes and their physicians and care teams.

UC San Diego Health Offering EHR, iPad Access to Patients

Patients at the recently-opened Jacobs Medical Center at UC San Diego Health can be in more command with their own experience by assessing their own medical information, controlling room features and more.

Texas Medical Center, Australia Form BioBridge to Develop Health Innovation

Houston-based Texas Medical Center (TMC) and the Melbourne-based Health Informatics Society of Australia (HISA) are collaborating on a health startup exchange program.

Teladoc Hits 101K Patient Visits in November

Telehealth vendor Teladoc announced this week that it totaled 101,600 e-health patient visits in November, setting a company record.

Research of mHealth Apps Reveals Significant Gaps in Quality

An evaluation of 137 patient-facing mobile health apps revealed that few apps address the needs of the patients who could benefit the most, according to research in December’s issue of Health Affairs.