Skip to content Skip to navigation

EHR Implementation May Lead to Revenue Loss, Survey Suggests

March 14, 2013
by Gabriel Perna and Mark Hagland
| Reprints
Mostashari Responds to Survey at Press Conference

According to a study, recently appearing in an issue of the journal Health Affairs,  implementing an electronic health record (EHR) could to lead to revenue loss. The authors of the report studied 49 community practices in a large EHR pilot through the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, and found that the average physician lost $43,743 over five years and just 27 percent of practices would have achieved a positive return on investment.

The researchers said that “only” an additional 14 percent of practices would have come out ahead had they received the $44,000 federal meaningful-use incentive. According to the researchers, “the largest difference between practices with a positive return on investment and those with a negative return was the extent to which they used their EHRs to increase revenue, primarily by seeing more patients per day or by improved billing that resulted in fewer rejected claims and more accurate coding.”

The survey’s authors said meaningful use incentives alone would not likely achieve a positive return on investment from EHR adoption. Most smaller providers, they reported, would need help from a regional extension center program.

In a press conference at the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), Farzad Mostashari, M.D., National Coordinator for Health IT, responded to the survey’s findings, saying the cost of EHR implementation isn’t realistically portrayed in the survey,

“The first study was kind of a sister project of mine, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, that basically covered all the costs for software, hardware, and support, for these practices in Massachusetts. So there was no price sensitivity in this,” Mostashari says. “In fact, providers in the real world are very price-sensitive. So the context of that study is important but not really generalizable. They’re saying it costs $137,000 per physician for hardware, software, and physician support. In this day and age, it would be hard to find comparable cost comparisons with that study.”



OSU Wexner Medical Center Receives AHIMA Grace Award

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) received the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) annual Grace Award in recognition of its leadership in health information management.

Kansas Health Information Network Expands its Network across State Lines

The Kansas Health Information Network (KHIN) has announced that it is expanding its horizons, and is now connected to Health Information Exchange Texas (HIETexas).

CMS Selects Vendor to Modernize Critical Identity Infrastructure

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) last week announced it had selected San Francisco-based vendor Okta to enhance the security of its information systems.

Mayo Clinic, ASU Partner for Medical Education, Healthcare Innovation

The Mayo Clinic and Arizona State University have announced a partnership centered on transforming medical education and healthcare in the U.S. through a variety of innovation efforts.

CMS Hospital Compare Website Updated with VA Data

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced the inclusion of Veterans Administration (VA) hospital performance data as part of the federal agency’s Hospital Compare website.

CMS Awards Funding to Special Innovation Projects

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has awarded 20, two-year Special Innovation Projects (SIPs) aimed at local efforts to deliver better care at lower cost.