Skip to content Skip to navigation

Risk Stratification Models Must Include Social Determinants of Health, New Report Finds

June 17, 2016
by Rajiv Leventhal
| Reprints

Current risk stratification models are not up to the task of addressing the future needs of healthcare organizations, and should be adding data about patients’ social determinants of health, according to a new report from Chilmark Research.

Indeed, the migration to value-based care (VBC) requires a new approach that moves beyond the simple, claims-based models in widespread use today, according to the report, Evolution to Total Active Risk: New Tools and Strategies to Deliver on Value-Based Care. The report provides a five-year roadmap for the adoption of total active risk and presents case studies highlighting four vendors that are transitioning away from traditional risk models. The vendors were Forecast Health, Health Catalyst, SCIO Health Analytics, and Verisk Health.

According to the research, it is well recognized in the industry that traditional risk profiles developed from clinical, claims, and utilization data only account for 10 percent of a patient's overall health outcomes. As such, healthcare organizations must therefore incorporate information about social, behavioral, and environmental factors into their risk stratification models in order to better understand a patient's total active risk.

Adding data about these social determinants of health, which account for about 70 percent of health outcomes, also assists total active risk in another key step in population health management: patient activation. By using a much broader data set, providers can identify more care gaps than they would in a traditional risk model. In addition, Healthcare organizations can gain better insight into individual drivers of patient engagement, which can help providers match patients to interventions, services, or resources that are most likely to improve outcomes.

As Jody Ranck, lead author of the report said, "Current risk models were largely developed for actuarial purposes. We now know claims and clinical datasets are not enough to effectively predict true risk for all high utilizers, and it is essential for future business success to incorporate additional measures to accurately manage the need for current and future services. Currently there are only a handful of HCOs and vendors tackling this problem, and those that do it well will have a significant competitive advantage in the coming years."



OSU Wexner Medical Center Receives AHIMA Grace Award

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) received the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) annual Grace Award in recognition of its leadership in health information management.

Kansas Health Information Network Expands its Network across State Lines

The Kansas Health Information Network (KHIN) has announced that it is expanding its horizons, and is now connected to Health Information Exchange Texas (HIETexas).

CMS Selects Vendor to Modernize Critical Identity Infrastructure

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) last week announced it had selected San Francisco-based vendor Okta to enhance the security of its information systems.

Mayo Clinic, ASU Partner for Medical Education, Healthcare Innovation

The Mayo Clinic and Arizona State University have announced a partnership centered on transforming medical education and healthcare in the U.S. through a variety of innovation efforts.

CMS Hospital Compare Website Updated with VA Data

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced the inclusion of Veterans Administration (VA) hospital performance data as part of the federal agency’s Hospital Compare website.

CMS Awards Funding to Special Innovation Projects

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has awarded 20, two-year Special Innovation Projects (SIPs) aimed at local efforts to deliver better care at lower cost.