Skip to content Skip to navigation

Study: Comparing Hospitals on Readmission Rates Creates Variance

October 9, 2012
by Gabriel Perna
| Reprints

According to a new study in the CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal), comparing hospital performance based on readmission rates and early death rates should require caution because those two indicators have significant variation in their values, depending on how they are calculated.

"Hospital-specific readmission rates have been reported as a quality of care indicator but no consensus exists on how these should be calculated. Our results highlight that caution is required when comparing hospital performance based on 30-day or urgent readmissions given their notable variation when methods used in their calculation change," stated Carl van Walraven, M.D., lead author of the study, senior scientist at Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) and associate professor at the University of Ottawa (uOttawa).

Due to the use of different methods and variables, readmission rates can result in different outcomes, the authors of the study found. They used hospital-specific 30-day death or readmission rates for adults at all 162 Ontario hospitals between 2005 and 2010 with various methods for confounder adjustment (age-sex v. complete) and different units of analysis (all hospitalizations v. 1 per patient). What they found was hospital-specific rankings varied extensively and changed based on which methodology was used.

According to the authors, readmission rates adjusted for age-sex alone had the greatest variation. "Our results highlight the caution required when comparing hospital performance using rates of death or readmission within 30 days," van Walraven wrote. "To measure quality of care, one would ideally measure the number of avoidable readmissions."

The authors recommend caution in using this measure to compare hospital performance.

"We found that slight changes in the methods used to calculate hospital-specific readmission rates had large influences on their values and the consequent hospital rankings. This should be kept in mind when comparing hospital performance using readmission rates,” van Walraven wrote.



Mayo Clinic, ASU Partner for Medical Education, Healthcare Innovation

The Mayo Clinic and Arizona State University have announced a partnership centered on transforming medical education and healthcare in the U.S. through a variety of innovation efforts.

CMS Hospital Compare Website Updated with VA Data

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced the inclusion of Veterans Administration (VA) hospital performance data as part of the federal agency’s Hospital Compare website.

CMS Awards Funding to Special Innovation Projects

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has awarded 20, two-year Special Innovation Projects (SIPs) aimed at local efforts to deliver better care at lower cost.

Center of Excellence in Genomic Science to be Established in Chicago

The National Human Genome Research Institute has awarded $10.6 million over five years for the establishment of a new research center in Chicago to advance genomic science.

EHNAC and HITRUST Combine HIPAA Security Criteria, CSF Framework

The Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (EHNAC) and the Health Information Trust Alliance (HITRUST) announced plans to streamline their accreditation and certification programs.

Halamka on MACRA Final Rule: “CMS is Listening and I Thank Them”

Health IT notable expert John Halamka, M.D., CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, recently weighed in on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) final rule.