Skip to content Skip to navigation

Study: Readmissions Penalties Won’t Improve Quality of Care

February 4, 2015
by Gabriel Perna
| Reprints

Penalizing hospitals for high readmissions rates is not necessarily the path toward improved quality of care reveals a new study from the Chicago-based Northwestern Medicine and the American College of Surgeons.

Authors of the study, titled "Underlying Reasons Associated with Hospital Readmission Following Surgery in the United States," examined the reasons for high surgical readmissions rates. They specifically looked at surgery types incorporated into penalties for the Readmissions Reduction Program. What they found was surgical are not due to poor care coordination or mismanagement of known issues, but rather complications that occurred after discharge such as wound infections.

"There has been a growing focus on reducing hospital readmissions from policymakers in recent years, including readmissions after surgery," stated lead author Karl Y. Bilimoria, M.D. a surgical oncologist and vice chair for quality at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and director of the Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. "But before this study, we didn't really understand the underlying reasons why patients were being readmitted to hospitals following surgery."

Looking at data from 346 hospitals and nearly 500,000 patient cases, the researchers found that only 5.7 percent of the patient cases had unplanned readmissions. Of those unplanned readmissions, only 2.3 percent of patients were readmitted due to a complication that occurred during their initial stay in the hospital. Of those unplanned readmissions, the most common cause was surgical-site infections at 19.5 percent, followed by delayed return of bowel function with an overall rate of 10.3 percent. Researchers say that efforts to reduce those complications are high in American hospitals and believe implementing, "policies requiring reductions in readmissions without understanding how to impact improvement could be counterproductive."

"Our results also highlighted that many of the complications involved in readmissions, such as surgical-site infections, are already well-know and part of other CMS pay-for-performance programs, which means hospitals are effectively being penalized twice for the same complications," said Dr. Bilimoria.



Gates Foundation Awards $210M to UW's Population Health Initiative

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is awarding $210 million to Seattle-based University of Washington’s Population Health Initiative, with the funds going toward the construction of a new building to serve as the initiative’s hub.

AHA Offers Interoperability Standards Recommendations to ONC

The American Hospital Association (AHA) has offered feedback to the ONC on the agency’s draft Interoperability Standards Advisory (ISA) that it issued in August.

Survey: Healthcare Orgs Not Taking Mobile Security Seriously Enough

More than half (56 percent) of healthcare professionals believe their organization could be doing more to educate employees on HIPAA compliance and the rules around sharing protected health information.

Mount Sinai’s Research Arm Using Data Analytics to Address Health Inequities

The Arnhold Institute for Global Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is partnering with DigitalGlobe to create the Health Equity Atlas Initiative (ATLAS), a platform that standardizes and maps population data in order to generate insights that address health inequities.

FDA, Hospitals Work to Improve Data Collection about Medical Devices

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is looking to improve the way it works with hospitals to modernize and streamline data collection, specifically safety data, about medical devices.

McKesson Unveils New Paragon Electronic Health Record Platform

McKesson Enterprise Information Solutions (EIS) announced the latest release of Paragon, its electronic health record (EHR) solution.