Skip to content Skip to navigation

Updated 21st Century Cures Bill Includes Interoperability, Telehealth Language

May 13, 2015
by Gabriel Perna
| Reprints
The 21st Century Cures Roundtable Photo Credit:

The House Energy and Commerce Committee released an updated version of the 21st Century Cures bill this week, which could overhaul the way medical innovations are regulated in the U.S.

The bill mostly focuses on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as well as device and drug innovation, but many elements specifically touch the health IT world. Most prominently the bill includes language promoting the interoperability of electronic health records and health IT systems. Starting in 2018, the bill would enact penalties to vendors that are not in compliance with interoperability criteria set by the Health IT Standards Committee and a charter healthcare development standards organization.

The interoperability language does not include anything on a patient identifier. This has drawn the ire of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME), which sent out an official statement a few hours after the bill was released to the public.

“Interoperability is a complex, multifaceted problem that will only improve when we have a standardized approach for collecting and sharing data, but that can only occur once a patient has been positively identified. Despite the Energy & Commerce Committee’s efforts to evaluate and enhance health information exchange, CHIME is disappointed that the Committee failed to include language recognizing the ongoing challenge posed by the inability to match patients across care settings,” the advocacy group said in a statement.

The previous version of the bill was released in late April and did not include any specific language on interoperability of EHRs. This frustrated health IT stakeholders, such as Premier Inc., a Charlotte, N.C.-based company that offers group purchasing, consulting, informatics and advocacy services for hospitals and health systems. Premier wrote a letter to the Committee urging that interoperability standards and transparency elements become a part of the bill. The company was much happier with the updated bill.

"We are very pleased with the legislation, as it stands today. In our recommendations (attached), we called for standards that promote interoperability and innovation, particularly through the use of open application programming interfaces (APIs); transparent and public interoperability measures; and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance. All of these recommendations were included in the Cures bill. If these principles remain intact, we are hopeful that we will finally have a strong policy framework that incents open source infrastructure and interoperability among disparate systems in healthcare. This is an essential step to optimize HIT investments, improve the quality of care across settings and avoid the cost burdens associated with the work around solutions that are needed today for systems to “talk” to one another," a representative of the company said to HCI.

The updated bill also includes language on telehealth. It calls for State medical boards to come together to create common licensure requirements for providing telehealth services and calls for appropriate expansion of telehealth coverage for Medicare beneficiaries.

This wasn't enough for the American Telemedicine Association, the Washington D.C.-based advocacy group expressed disappointment in Congress for "hitting the snooze button" on substantive legislation.

 “It appears that the staff and members of the Committee have once again been led by CMS and the Congressional Budget Office into asking for a study instead of taking real action,” Jonathan Linkous, CEO of ATA, said in a statement. “These studies are ‘snooze buttons’ that allow CMS to delay any action for years.  Unfortunately, this is not the first time this has occurred.  Fifteen years ago CMS also convinced Congress to ask for a study instead of taking action - but the agency has yet to deliver that report.  We suspect the same will occur this time around as well.”

The bill, which is being championed by Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), who is Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has a scheduled mark up on Thursday of this week. It is a product of the Committee’s 21st Century Cures initiative, which began a year ago.

“Every step in this process has been hard fought, not for our own interests, but for those who suffer. Every policy has been scrutinized, every voice considered. We’ve pushed harder and faster than anyone thought possible, because we know patients cannot wait. They need 21st Century Cures now,” Upton said in a statement.



I am sorry to say this but I feel like my own government is run by a bunch of idiots. Requiring interoperability without a standard national medical ID number is just plain foolish. Yes, people don't like a national ID, but try and get rid of their social security number and see what happens. Just bite the bullet and do it, people will get used to it. Make it for medical purposes only. While at this get some input from people like me on the front lines trying to do population health improvements with data from all over the place. Patient matching is the single point of failure. If you can't match, nothing else matters. Worse, matching wrong can lead to inappropriate care (as well as nightmare data clean up to undo a bad patient merge). So you tend to not match rather than wrong match. It is long overdue for a national medical ID. Why can't my representatives see this?


ONC National Coordinator Gets Live Look at Carequality Data Exchange

Officials from Carequality have stated that there are now more than 150,000 clinicians across 11,000 clinics and 500 hospitals live on its network. These participants are also able to share health data records with one another, regardless of technology vendor.

American Red Cross, Teladoc to Provide Telehealth Services to Disaster Victims

The American Red Cross announced a partnership with Teladoc to deliver remote medical care to communities in the United States that are significantly affected by disasters.

Report: The Business of Cybercrime in Healthcare is Growing

While stolen financial data still has a higher market value than stolen medical records, as financial data can be monetized faster, there are indications that there is ongoing development of a market for stolen medical data, according to an Intel Security McAfee Labs report.

Phishing Attack at Baystate Health Potentially Exposes Data of 13K Patients

A phishing scam at Baystate Health in Springfield, Mass. has potentially exposed the personal data of 13,000 patients, according to a privacy statement from the patient care organization and a report from MassLive.

New Use Cases Driving Growth in Health Data Exchange through Direct

In an update, DirectTrust reported significant growth in Direct exchange of health information and the number of trusted Direct addressed enabled to share personal health information (PHI) in the third quarter of 2016.

Insurers to CBO: Consider Private Insurers’ Data in Evaluations of Telemedicine

Eleven private insurers, including Aetna, Humana and Anthem, are urging the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to consider the experience of commercial insurers when evaluating the impact of telemedicine coverage in Medicare.