The Texas Hospital Association’s Bold Data Analytics Thrust | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

The Texas Hospital Association’s Bold Data Analytics Thrust

October 4, 2017
by Mark Hagland
| Reprints
The Texas Hospital Association’s chief digital officer reports on THA’s bold data initiative

It’s not only individual hospitals, medical groups, and health systems whose leaders are working to leverage data to improve outcomes and lower costs, in the current shift away from pure fee-for-service payment, and towards value, in the U.S. healthcare system; the leaders of associations of provider organizations are doing so as well.

One of the provider associations whose leaders are moving forward quickly in this area is the Austin-based Texas Hospital Association (THA). The THA’s leaders have steadily been developing a strategic data management framework for unifying patient records and exchanging information across the state. Based in Austin, THA is one of the largest hospital associations in the country, representing more than 85 percent of the state's acute-care hospitals and health care systems, which in turn employ some 365,000 health care professionals statewide.

Driven by its vision of a unified healthcare delivery system for Texas, THA is leveraging the EMPI solution from the Monrovia, California-based NextGate, in order to assess and analyze data from its member hospitals, in order to help them improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. The EMPI gives THA the ability to accurately match and link patient information in the absence of a common identifier, allowing providers to achieve a unified view of any patient across all facilities and health systems with the ability to share information, regardless of system, for improved care coordination.

Fernando Martinez, Ph.D., who is both senior vice president and chief digital officer of the Texas Hospital Association, and president and CEO of the Texas Hospital Association Foundation, the organization’s research and educational arm, spoke recently with Healthcare Informatics Editor-in-Chief Mark Hagland regarding THA’s bold data analytics initiative. Below are excerpts from that interview.

Please tell me a bit about yourself and your role at the association and the foundation.


Experience New Records for Speed & Scale: High Performance Genomics & Imaging

Through real use cases and live demo, Frank Lee, PhD, Global Industry Leader for Healthcare & Life Sciences, will illustrate the architecture and solution for high performance data and AI...

I’ve been with THA for three years, as of December 1. My background is as a turnaround CIO in healthcare; I’ve worked in healthcare since I was 16. I spent the first half of my career working in finance, including revenue cycle, and then transitioned from finance into running IT, and the last 15 years, I’ve worked as a turnaround CIO, primarily in public healthcare. The CEO at THA had been my former boss at Parkland Health System in Dallas, and also at Jackson Health System in Miami, before that.

Fernando Martinez

You’re the first chief digital officer at THA, correct? And what is your mission at the association?

Yes, that’s correct. And my core mission is not only to provide the technical platform from which to run the organization, but also to create, from a digital strategy point of view, a platform of data that will accurately allow our policy, advocacy and legislative folks to provide folks in the Legislature with recommendations that impact Texas hospitals. We’re very dependent on data. And one of the strategic objectives I’ve been asked to execute on has been building a statewide database that provides a longitudinal view of the data, including elements around costs, utilization, and quality, in order to help us support and advocate for, Texas hospitals.

What have been the challenges in creating that statewide database with a longitudinal view?

The most significant challenge has been the diversity of healthcare organizations in the state of Texas. I frequently interact with my peers at other state hospital associations; and it turns out that some associations don’t have the level of diversity around data, with regard to all the critical-access hospitals, that we have here in Texas. In Texas, we have a very large number of critical-access hospitals, a very large group of rural hospitals, a significant number of independent community hospitals; as well as some large for-profit hospitals, like Tenet, which is based here, and HCA, which has a strong presence; as well as many large not-for-profit hospitals. So the biggest challenge is representing the reality of all these diverse hospitals. And that’s challenging, because if getting 10 hospitals to agree to anything is challenging, getting 500 to do so is really challenging.

Can you share what the timeframe around this initiative has been?

Yes, it started a few months after I came, so we’ve been working on it for nearly two years.

And how long has it been live?

For between six months and a year.

What types of data does the database encompass?

It’s primarily claims data. This is a statewide, all-payer, longitudinal database, founded on claims data.

How is it being used?

The association is aggregating the data, and in terms of how it’s being used in the policy and advocacy arena, our policy folks, legislative team, and analysts working with state legislators, are the ones who consume the data and look at the trends, for policy people in the legislature. Meanwhile, some of our hospitals participate in the data program, which uses this longitudinal database as well.

In that regard, the database also serves as a tool for our hospitals—roughly 250 hospitals that participate in the data program, and are able to look at claims data across the state, and to model data. The data program itself has been in place for many years, well before the database was established; we just now have the additional capability of a broader, all-payer view of the state, which wasn’t available before. We’re not alone in the U.S. in building an all-payer, longitudinal database; probably 35 of the state hospital associations have built longitudinal or all-payer databases for their states.

What led you and your colleagues to partner with NextGate?

NextGate came into the equation when we were looking at creating the potential for additional analysis around patients, patient behaviors, clinical trends, etc. The industry at large is going from predictive analytics to cognitive analytics. Having said that, our members wanted greater insight, and want to reconcile social determinant data to clinical outcomes, to any number of diagnostic and post-care metrics that you can pick up from claims. But to do that, you need to normalize a patient’s identity. To see the social determinants associated with a particular individual, how that’s reconciled against a pattern of care and treatment, you have to be able to identify that person across a variety of hospitals and care venues. So having the master-patient index capability is inherent to evolving a data program forward to look at more advanced analytics, and model your data in meaningful ways. So NextGate happened to be the organization that we felt most confident about in terms of their capabilities.

So some of your hospitals are looking to analyze patients across venues for population health and care management?

I wouldn’t necessarily make that leap, but what hospitals are doing is identifying individual patients, in order to see what a particular patient is doing across multiple organizations. And in that context, de-identified information, in terms of trends and behaviors, is valuable. And we’ve found that our members do find our members are interested in that. Reconciling care patterns and social determinants allows them to think about these issues. It’s not so much that we have Mark’s information—it’s that we have a certain type of patient, and we notice that their behavior patterns and outcomes differed from someone with a different set of social determinant characteristics, as shown by their data. And then, having looked at the larger body of data and identified trends and characteristics, they can go into their databases and look for patients who meet particular types of criteria, and can work on adjusting their strategies as a result.

The ability to identify trends and reconcile certain outcomes and patient characteristics and attribute them to social determinant or geographic data, is helpful. For instance, rural versus urban differences—data on those differences is actionable. Because they have much more than just claims data, they also have financial and clinical data. And once they’ve identified a pattern that relates to behavior around a particular service line—some hospitals have good revenue cycle information, as well as other types of information, and they can correlate trends they see statewide, and can go into their data set and create better treatment protocols, develop a new service line, and can anticipate care or treatment options.

In the shift from volume to value in U.S. healthcare, hospital and health system leaders are trying to figure out, using data, how to track and improve their clinical and operational performance, correct?

Yes. I will tell you that ten years ago, we had a problem in that we couldn’t get enough data. We were constantly looking for sources of data in order to build big enough databases in order to do enough meaningful analysis. In the past ten years, the pendulum has swung to the other side, where organizations are struggling with the large volume of data they have. So the challenge going forward is not whether you have enough data to do analysis, but rather, how to transform data into information, and then into analysis. So, industrywide, I think there is a significant push towards deriving value from data.

The era of, we have to collect more data, has given way to a new era of trying to derive value from the data. And certainly, claims data is a subset of the overall range of data available. But when you take certain types of data and you can then normalize certain types of patients, all sorts of interesting trends come out of it, which allow you to focus more and mine your own data to analyze trends. And everyone’s facing similar challenges: all associations want to provide greater value to our members; we want to help our hospital members provide more efficient care—the margins are diminishing all the time—and ultimately, we want to provide better care for patients. And to the extent that we can use analytics to support that, we’re meeting our goals in helping our member hospitals. I think that all of us at hospital associations nationwide are trying to help our members to succeed in that shift.

Does the state of Texas require hospitals to publicly post outcomes data?

Yes, in Texas, the hospitals are required to report inpatient, outpatient, and ED data to the state; it is compulsory. 

Does that mean reporting specific data on conditions and treatments?

No, it’s claims data reporting. At the end of each quarter, each hospital has to report to the state that quarter’s claims data. All payers they work with, all visits—the typical 835 code set—each hospital provides a quarterly file to the state, with all its claims. And all the states in turn consolidate that data, and report it to the federal government, and that’s how the federal government develops national data sets around conditions. But it’s all claims data, using the normal 835 claims data set.

What will happen over the next few years at THA?

That really is the “64,000-dollar question.” I’ve been a professor of graduate education for over a decade, and I’ve found that more and more, the industry is evolving forward away from having its data isolated in vertical silos, and towards sharing data. A lot of the data is not yet publicly available, simply because the mechanism for doing so is not available, or because of policy; and in that regard, I think the barriers will be coming down. HHS [the federal Department of Health and Human Services] and other agencies, have been seeing net improvements—quality scores overall have dramatically improved—and the reality is that a lot of the improvement has come from data analysis, and from reconciling different data sources.

Once the mechanisms for data-sharing have been developed, it will be logical to evolve forward and say, maybe there are more ways to reduce cost and improve outcomes. So there will be a growing trend of transparency around aggregate bodies of data, with the hopes that organizations will continue to use that data to drive down waste and inefficiency and drive up outcomes quality and drive up care models.

Is there anything else that you’d like to add?

I certainly think it’s important to recognize that the transition away from traditional fee-for-service healthcare and towards value-centric payment models is built on a foundation of providing care in the most efficient way. And that really requires a lot of integration of data. And we’re finding that it’s convenient to be able to normalize patient identity. And if all the participants in that patient care continuum have the ability to normalize patient identity, it enables a more seamless and elegant way for patients to flow from one venue on the continuum to another. As long as we can’t normalize individuals across disparate organizations, sources, or venues of care, there’s an inherently organically built-in barrier to that transition. So in spite of what we may be doing around normalizing patient identity, there’s a much greater objective we should be seeking as an industry. To build these value-based models, we need to get better at identifying our patients uniquely; doing so will accelerate this work, and improve the value of care.



2018 Raleigh Health IT Summit

Renowned leaders in U.S. and North American healthcare gather throughout the year to present important information and share insights at the Healthcare Informatics Health IT Summits.

September 27 - 28, 2018 | Raleigh


Portal Makes Genomic, Clinical Data Resources Available to Pediatric Health Researchers, Families

September 13, 2018
by David Raths, Contributing Editor
| Reprints
Goal is to help accelerate the discovery of precision-based treatments for pediatric disorders

A new data resource portal at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) offers researchers, clinicians and families access to open-source and cloud-based data resources to share information about childhood diseases, including pediatric cancer and birth defects.

CHOP’s Gabriella Miller Kids First Data Resource Center (DRC), a collaborative effort supported by the NIH Common Fund launched the data resource portal to help accelerate the discovery of precision-based treatments for pediatric disorders.

Led by CHOP’s Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), DRC partners include the hospital’s Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children’s National Health System, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Center for Data Intensive Science at the University of Chicago, Oregon Health and Science University and Seven Bridges, a biomedical data analysis company.

According to CHOP, the Kids First Data Resource Portal provides access to newly released, large-scale NIH-sponsored and consortia-based pediatric genomic and clinical disease data, and empowers accelerated discovery efforts by enabling collaborative cloud-based analyses across institutions and researchers around the globe.

Data from approximately 8,000 DNA and RNA samples from children affected with cancer or structural birth defects and their families will be ready for analysis with the launch of the portal and are expected to grow to more than 30,000 over the next few years. The Kids First Data Resource Portal will be one of the largest collections of integrated genomic and clinical data for these childhood diseases, which previously were studied largely in isolation.

The portal also provides rich resources for the patient, medical and research communities to partner, learn and interact with the Kids First DRC, highlighting the importance of collaboration and data sharing across institutions and between disease communities.

“In a prepared statement, Adam Resnick, Ph.D., lead principal investigator of the Kids First DRC and director of the D3b at CHOP’s Division of Neurosurgery, discussed the significance of the research portal: “The DRC’s Kids First research portal represents a data-driven discovery milestone for the implementation of tools and resources for performing biomedical research and for doing science collaboratively in entirely new and unprecedented ways in the hopes of accelerating discovery and clinical translation for each and every child suffering from cancer or a structural birth defect around the globe,”

Last year Healthcare Informatics published an in-depth interview with Dr. Resnick about the collaborative approach CHOP and other pediatric hospitals are taking to research and biomedical data analysis.



More From Healthcare Informatics


Putting Social Determinants of Health Data into Action

September 10, 2018
by Heather Landi, Associate Editor
| Reprints
Healthcare leaders engaged in these efforts have found that health IT is foundational to this work in the collection of social determinants data as well for data exchange across the care continuum and risk stratification
Geisinger's Fresh Food Farmacy initiative

Healthcare providers that provide direct patient care have long recognized that social and economic factors have a significant impact on the health of an individual, and the health of populations, yet it has only been in the past few years that healthcare organizations have started to formalize an approach to addressing social determinants of health, such as food insecurity, housing, transportation and literacy.

These efforts to focus more on the upstream factors that influence patients’ health are occurring in parallel to the healthcare industry’s ongoing transition from fee-for-service to value-based care and payment models, as patient care organizations look to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. For health systems, moving beyond facility walls to collect and incorporate social determinants data into community level programs represents the next phase of population health management strategy.

“Healthcare providers have known for a long time that social determinants are incredibly important, but there hasn’t been, in a regular fee-for-service model, an incentive for healthcare organizations to partner with community-based organizations,” says Robert Fields, M.D., senior vice president and chief medical officer for population health at the New York City-based Mount Sinai Health System. “When you start to get paid on outcomes and reductions in total cost of care then it makes it financially reasonable to invest upstream into infrastructure and preventive care. Many times, that preventive care looks a lot like closing social determinants gaps to avoid the downstream cost. The economics are changing.”

Robert Fields, M.D.


Experience New Records for Speed & Scale: High Performance Genomics & Imaging

Through real use cases and live demo, Frank Lee, PhD, Global Industry Leader for Healthcare & Life Sciences, will illustrate the architecture and solution for high performance data and AI...

Indeed, a report from the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions based on a survey with hospital officials about their efforts to gather and analyze social data about their patients found that there was a high correlation between health systems that were screening for social determinants and those that were involved in at-risk payment models and were already pretty far along in their journey to value-based care.

What’s more, researchers at the University of South Florida (USF) College of Public Health, Tampa, and WellCare Health Plans found that healthcare spending is substantially reduced when people are successfully connected to social services that address social barriers. The researchers’ study, which assessed the impact of social services among 2,700 Medicaid and Medicare Advantage members on healthcare costs, reported an additional 10 percent reduction in healthcare costs—equating to more than $2,400 per person per year savings—for people who were successfully connected to social services compared to a control group of members who were not.

Healthcare leaders engaged in these efforts have found that health IT is foundational to this work in the collection of social determinants data as well for data exchange across the care continuum, workflow integration and analytics to risk stratify the highest-need individuals. Leading hospitals, medical groups, and health systems, as well as accountable care organizations (ACOs) and health insurers are moving forward in this work with a number of different approaches.

Early Efforts to Capture SDoH Data

At Rush University in Chicago, clinical and IT leaders developed a social determinants of health screening tool within the electronic health record (EHR) to combine with clinical registry data. Rush University Medical Center leveraged the NowPow platform and integrated it into the workflows of the primary care physicians and frontline staff, according to Michael Hanak, M.D., associate chief medical informatics officer at Rush University.

After the provider completes the patient intake process, the Rush EHR combines the social data with the medical history into a patient profile that it sends to NowPow. The software queries the company’s database of local community resources to identify where patients can receive needed services. NowPow then provides a curated list of resources and services — called a HealtheRx—that matches the patient’s needs. The technology enters the HealtheRx in the patient’s medical record, sends it to the identified community-based providers, and emails and/or texts it to the patient.

Michael Hanak, M.D.

“This is a gamechanger for population health,” Hanak says. Clinical IT leaders are collecting the social data and using that to risk stratify patients. “That’s helpful when we look at our patients who are in managed care contracts, so we’re applying wraparound services to our higher-risk patients and the social determinants screening is part of that.”

Hanak says patient navigators used the tool to screen patients who were no-shows for doctor’s appointments. “We found that nearly one-third of these patients who had missed a visit had a social need that we could assist with. Our hope is that we see that actually improves adherence to visits and engagement with care,” he says.

Clinicians at the University of Arkansas Medical Sciences (UAMS) Medical Center in Little Rock are prompted by their EHR to ask patients questions about their personal life regarding their financial situation, drinking habits, social isolation and domestic abuse as part of the hospital’s efforts to standardize the collection of social needs data. Stephen Mette, M.D., the medical center’s chief clinical officer, says clinical and IT leaders began an effort about two years ago to embed these questions in the EHR as part of a larger mission at UAMS to systematically address social health inequities that create health disparities.

Stephen Mette, M.D.

“Technology is wonderful in that it allows us to have ready access to data, and the ability to analyze the data and package the data in useful ways to allow the data to be used to inform clinical decisions by providers,” he says, although he adds that the accuracy of data and the availability of data to providers continue to be challenges. “But, we’re much further ahead than we were a few years ago because of our data systems.”

Bradley Hunter, research director at Orem, Utah-based KLAS Research, says health information exchanges (HIEs) are well-positioned to play a vital role in these efforts by bridging gaps between the healthcare and social services sectors. In fact, the Strategic Health Information Exchange Collaborative (SHIEC) recently established a Social Determinants Committee, with the core aim to help SHIEC better focus on identifying and linking social determinants of health data and to overcome challenges for data exchange between health and social service entities.

Leveraging SDoH Data for Population Health Efforts

Health insurer Humana is actively addressing social determinants of health as part of its Bold Goal initiative, with a goal of improving the health of the communities it serves 20 percent by 2020. Measuring progress using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) population health management tool known as Healthy Days, Humana found that implementing community-level changes has led to positive health outcomes for elderly beneficiaries with heart disease, diabetes, respiratory conditions and other chronic diseases. For example, individuals in Humana’s San Antonio Bold Goal community saw a 3.5 percent improvement in Healthy Days and Knoxville participants saw a 5.4 percent improvement.

Many integrated health systems such as Kaiser, Partners, Intermountain and Geisinger also are at the forefront of these efforts.

As a participant in the MassHealth (Medicaid) ACO, Boston-based Partners Healthcare is required to screen Medicaid ACO patients for social determinants factors and has integrated that process into its primary care practices.

“It’s not just screening for screening’s sake,” says Rose Kakoza, M.D., assistant medical director for Medicaid for the Center of Population Health at Partners Healthcare. “We’ve been very thoughtful to think about, as we screen for social determinants of health, we need to make sure we have the appropriate resources in place to manage the needs that come to light as a result of that screening.” To address this, the organization deployed parallel care management strategies and increased its staff of community resource specialists and social work support.

Partners also worked with its eCare team (eCare is the organization’s enterprise-wide Epic EHR) to map the positive screening results to ICD-10 codes, enabling clinical leaders, for the first time, to track unmet social needs in a systematic way. The next phase, Kakoza says, is to integrate a platform into the EHR to track whether the referral loop was closed.

Danville, Pa.-based Geisinger Health System also is further along on this path with an innovative initiative, called Fresh Food Farmacy, that aims to address food insecurity, as a significant social factor impacting health, and to improve patients’ diabetes management. Geisinger’s Fresh Food Farmacy provides fresh, healthy food to diabetes patients, at no cost to the patients. The health system initially launched the program in July 2016 as a pilot project at Geisinger Shamokin Area Community Hospital in Coal Township, in Northumberland County, which has the second-highest rate of long-term diabetes complications in central Pennsylvania.

Project leaders have seen significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients enrolled in the Food Farmacy program, to date. Robust data analytics plays a critical role in the success of the project, says Andrea Feinberg, M.D., medical director of Health and Wellness at Geisinger Health and the clinical champion of the initiative. “The data analytics is huge; we have an incredible dashboard that we use and it tracks what’s going on with the patients and the program. Without that, we would not be able to support the work that we’re doing,” she says.

At New York City-based Mount Sinai Health System, leaders of the organization’s ACO, Mount Sinai Health Partners, are working with Lumeris, a St. Louis-based health plan and managed services vendor, to use its analytics platform to identify the social needs of its 400,000 members, connect them to community resources and then risk stratify patients for further intervention. IT leaders also are working to integrate the social determinants care plan and the workflows into its health IT systems.

According to Fields, Lumeris’ platform leverages publicly available data, such as census data, and also purchases social determinants data, like credit agency data, and then combines that with claims data, and the runs the data through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to come up with predictive modeling for patients at risk of hospital admission. Fields led similar successful efforts at Asheville, North Carolina-based Mission Health Partners, what he calls a “heavily social determinants-driven” Medicare ACO affiliated with the Mission Health healthcare system.

“With this predictive modeling, I can tell you with a relatively high degree of certainty, for any of our attributed lives, the risk of a patient ending up in the hospital for an unplanned admission within the next 30 days, which is amazing, to think about, being able to look upstream,” he says. “As a provider or a care management entity, if you knew that a specific patient was going to end up in the hospital, what would you do differently? Probably a lot. That’s what we started to work with at Mission, and now we’ll be working here at Mount Sinai, using that predictive model to start prioritizing patients to figure out who might need outreach and what kind of outreach that might be.”

He also notes that analytics, and specifically predictive analytics, are critical components to this work. “Any ACO or any participant in value-based care has a set amount of resources, they are not unlimited.
What analytics allows you to do is really identify those patients that are likely to have a bad outcome or lead to high cost, ideally before that happens, and then, of those patients that are likely to have a bad outcome, who is likely to benefit from what specific social determinant need. To the degree that analytics and predictive analytics can start to identify those for you, it saves hours of potential evaluation and assessment of the patients in your population. And the efficiency that will come from that is pretty unbelievable,” he says, adding, “Both predictive analytics and risk stratification are incredibly important to be able to identify and then prioritize the patients.”

Challenges to Addressing SDoH

The Deloitte Center for Health Solutions study on social determinants of health within healthcare systems found that there is strong interest, but lack of funding and little measurement of impact.

According to the report, 80 percent of the people surveyed said, yes, social needs are a core part of our mission. Seventy-two percent said they don’t have sustainable funding to do it. In an interview with Healthcare Informatics Contributing Editor David Raths about the report, Josh Lee, a principal in the firm’s Healthcare Provider Strategy Practice, said, “That is in many ways a heartbreaking mismatch. They are saying ‘we know this should be part of our mission, but we really don’t know how we can pay for it.’ Forty percent felt they were doing something in this regard, but had no way of measuring whether it was working or not. Those three numbers—80, 72 and 40—tell the story.”

Mount Sinai’s Fields also notes that operationalizing this work continues to be very challenging as addressing social needs is still based on having a relationship with the patient. “Even with all the technology in the world, it’s still challenging to develop operations that can actually make an impact and engage with patients in this work. It requires a great deal of sensitivity and whole lot of patience to engage with patients in this work.”

Related Insights For: Analytics


In the Emerging World of Risk-Based Contracting, Data Analytics Is a Foundational Necessity

September 7, 2018
by Mark Hagland, Editor-in-Chief
| Reprints
As patient care organizations engage in more rigorous and challenging risk-based contracts, the need to leverage data and analytics to support value-based care delivery operations is becoming paramount

Industry sages have been predicting for years now the time when all the processes around the leveraging of data analytics would become fundamental to operational and financial success among the leaders of U.S. patient care organizations. Well, with the emergence of more and more risk-based contracting, including two-sided risk, that moment has clearly arrived.

Indeed, the August 9 announcement on the part of Seema Verma, Administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), of a proposal dubbed “Pathways For Success,” appeared to mark an inflection point in the U.S. healthcare system’s journey around risk-based contracting. That proposal, if finalized, would remove the traditional three tracks in the voluntary Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), and replace them with two tracks that eligible ACOs would enter into for an agreement period of no less than five years: the BASIC track, which would allow eligible ACOs to begin under a one-sided model and incrementally phase in higher levels of risk; and the ENHANCED track, which is based on the program’s existing Track 3, providing additional tools and flexibility for ACOs that take on the highest level of risk and potential rewards. That proposal has received very mixed reviews among patient care organization and ACO leaders, with some ACO leaders pushing back on CMS, asserting that two-sided risk is still too difficult and challenging for many provider organizations.

But regardless of the near-term and middle-term fate of “Pathways For Success,” industry leaders fully recognize that the U.S. healthcare system is inevitably headed further into risk-based contracting, including into two-sided risk-based contracting—however long it might take to reach a tipping point, in which the majority of patient care organizations are receiving significant percentages of their reimbursement via two-sided risk.

A Lot of Basic Blocking-and-Tackling Obstacles Remain


Experience New Records for Speed & Scale: High Performance Genomics & Imaging

Through real use cases and live demo, Frank Lee, PhD, Global Industry Leader for Healthcare & Life Sciences, will illustrate the architecture and solution for high performance data and AI...

Of course, the urgency on the part of the purchasers and payers of healthcare to push providers into two-sided risk makes absolute economic sense, says Don Crane, president and CEO of America’s Physician Groups (APG), a Los Angeles-based, nationwide association of physician groups involved in risk-based contracts. “Upside risk makes sense for a while, baby steps,” Crane says. “But it’s weak tea in terms of driving real change. If you get lucky with the right benchmarks, you can do well. But it doesn’t induce real structural change. But when an organization faces downside risk, also known as bankruptcy—that really forces change. When you take that higher risk, you have to have the data. You have to risk-stratify your population, and treble down on the resources you’re using on the patients at highest risk.” And, he adds, “All of a sudden, you move into the big leagues.”

Don Crane

Still, despite the fact that the purchasers and payers of healthcare are pushing providers forward to take on more risk and downside risk in their contracts, the leaders of patient care organizations remain challenged by many rather basic blocking-and-tackling types of data management and analysis challenges. As Liam Bouchier, principal advisor at the Naperville, Ill.-based Impact Advisors consulting firm, puts it, “The data challenge is not a new challenge; the biggest challenge is still getting a complete and comprehensive view of the patient. It’s only been in the past five years that information has really begun to flow. When you look at a longitudinal view of the patient’s care, it’s important to see what’s happened between hospital stays,” he adds.

Fred Horton, president of AMGA Consulting, the consulting arm of the Alexandria, Va.-based American Medical Group Association (AMGA), a nationwide association of large medical groups, says that “There are a couple of different areas” of fundamental concern, as provider organizations move to leverage data analytics in order to manage risk. “Number one is the investment in the EHR [electronic health record]. A lot of health systems are roll-ups of multiple organizations, so you may have multiple EHRs to gather data from. There are EHR-agnostic tools that can analyze data coming from multiple EHRs. That trend will continue into the future. But then there’s the piece involving how much a particular patient is seen by a particular health system, and that’s a challenge. Let’s say some of the urgent care visits and some of the primary care visits are happening outside your health system. How do you ultimately obtain all the data, so you can analyze what’s going on?”

What’s more, he notes, the amount of relevant data in any organization’s EHR “could be less than 25 percent of all the data would be necessary to understand what the potential for risk is. The EHR might capture two or three medical visits a year, but that might actually be a minor element in what you need to truly manage under a risk-based or value-based environment.”

Towards “Generation 2.0” with Data: Predicting First Hospitalizations

The good news in all this is that the leaders of some of the most advanced multispecialty physician groups have steadily been learning how to leverage data, says John Cuddeback, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical informatics officer at AMGA Analytics, the analytics-focused division of AMGA. What have they learned? “I think the fundamental strategy for managing population health depends on risk stratification and matching what you’re doing for each individual person within the population, with their needs. And if you can use data to figure out where they fall on the risk continuum and proactively address primary prevention, secondary prevention, or monitoring of chronic conditions needs, that’s the big opportunity,” Cuddeback says. “And in the very first generation of population health involved clinical decision support in the EHR,” medical group leaders gathered together data on the diseases of their patients with chronic illnesses, and used clinical guidelines to manage their care.

John Cuddeback, M.D., Ph.D.

“The next thing,” Cuddeback says, “was registries, finding the patients who are not coming in, and need a screening or preventive service or something, that’s something like Generation 1.1. Generation 2.0 is using longitudinal data on populations to create predictive models. We know what’s going on for a patient at a particular time, and we know what will probably be going on in two or more years. So let’s take advantage of that and create good predictive models. We need to find the rising-risk patients and address their needs.”

Very importantly, Cuddeback says, “One of the big advantages of having clinical data is that you can predict an initial hospitalization. Historically, people have used claims data well to build predictive models. But the weakness with claims data is that you’re building models based on historical data, meaning you’re looking towards potential readmissions. So predicting initial admissions is the new thing that people are working on. But the implementational aspect of this is that you have to become much more proactive in your care design. Because if you’re just waiting for people to arrive, the predictive model does you no good. So the predictive model will help you figure out who your rising risk populations are. But we have to change our care delivery and management models.”

Moving Forward in Massachusetts: MACIPA’s Path

The senior executives of physician groups who have been working in the trenches in value-based healthcare delivery and payment are working through a series of challenges. One medical group that exemplifies intensive effort in the face of those challenges is the Mt. Auburn Cambridge Independent Practice Association, or MACIPA, a Boston-area, 500-physician independent practice association that participated in the Pioneer ACO Program for three years from 2012 through 2014, and is now in the Track 3 section of the MSSP program. MACIPA president and CEO Barbara Spivak, M.D., a primary care physician, says flatly, “I don’t think you can do risk-based contracting without data. I’m not even talking about the business side; on the clinical side, you need to know who your sick patients are, and we all know that costs go up when there are gaps in care. So you need to know who your sick patients are, where they’re going, and where the gaps in care are. And that’s even before quality management.”

What’s more, Spivak says, “The physicians need actionable data. It doesn’t help me that my colon cancer screening rate is 50 percent and needs to be 60 percent; as a PCP, I need to have the patients identified and to bring them in. The issue is not what we need; what we need is similar to what we needed when we started with electronic records and population health 15 years ago. The challenge is that the data is exponentially more.”

Barbara Spivak, M.D.

Spivak says that she and her colleagues have had no regrets whatsoever about participating in the Medicare ACO programs, despite the frustrations—including that, as of mid-summer of this year, they still had not received key performance data from CMS on their 2017 performance, for example. Indeed, she says, the reality of the complexity of the MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Performance System) program that now governs physician payment under Medicare for those physicians in practice not involved in ACOs and other authorized alternative payment models, is forcing physicians forward. “I believe the way they’ve structured MIPS and MACRA [the overarching law, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015] is way too complicated for anybody but someone who’s in a big system, where the system’s going to take care of it. If you’re in a small private practice on your own, it’s going to be virtually impossible. It is probably succeeding in pushing people into alternative payment models.”

Moving into Social Determinants Data Management

For years, it’s been a truism that one of the key challenges in harnessing data to support value-based healthcare delivery, has been that of marrying clinical and claims data—a challenge that continues to vex many, if not most, patient care organizations moving into risk. At the same time, one of the important frontier areas emerging around the leveraging of data analytics for value-based healthcare, is the pursuit of data around the social determinants of health. All those who are moving into that area agree that it remains challenging. As MACIPA’s Spivak says, “The EHRs are not always set up to help you with the social determinants. And we are trying to do some of that. I’ll give an example,” she offers. “We have social workers and health coaches. We don’t have a lot, because we’re small. But last year, they identified all the patients 90 and over in our senior products, and called them to make sure that they were being taken care of medically, and had transportation, weren’t living on the second floor and isolated, so we tried to reach out to them.”

Meanwhile, Spivak continues, “This year, we looked at whether they could identify family members—in patients who had dementia, we tried reaching out to those family members of patients. We were not doing it based on people’s insurance, we were doing it based on other factors. So we’ve been trying to do that”—gather and use more social determinants data. “Our care managers of course look at people who are in the hospital two or three times or use the EDs more.”

Of course, it really helps to be working in a payer-provider environment. That’s what the folks at the UPMC health system are doing in western Pennsylvania. The umbrella UPMC organization includes the UPMC Health Plan, and the health plan and provider divisions of the umbrella organization have been collaborating around data for years, in order to improve the health status of covered populations.

Pamela Peele, Ph.D., chief analytics officer at UPMC Insurance Services and UPMC Enterprises, says, “We absolutely have a great advantage in being an integrated health system. You can’t manage what you can’t measure. And providers can only see the patients in front of them. Payers, we get everything. We’re asking providers to manage risks they can’t even see. So we’re trying to give providers a broad view of the risks they’re trying to manage.”

Pamela Peele, Ph.D.

Peele notes that the UPMC Insurance Services and UPMC health system professionals are working forward in a few distinct areas right now. “The first one,” she says, “is around opioid abuse. In conjunction with providers, we’ve been identifying worrisome prescriptions that are ordered in EDs, etc., and we’ve been giving them the data and are identifying those worrisome situations, and are pushing that information right into the EHR so the provider can see it at the point of care. That,” she said, “is a great example of how a payer and provider can come together for the benefit of our membership. And per readmissions, the provider can only see readmission rates in their own facilities. We can see all readmissions via our claims, and can provide information to our providers about true readmission rates.”

And the results? “We’ve definitely seen a decrease in opioid prescribing; and our providers love the collaboration,” Peele reports. “We’ve also seen a decrease in readmission rates over time. If you’re asking a provider to take risk on readmissions, you have to give them accurate data,” she adds. “So when a payer and provider come together, you can accomplish that. And once again, you can’t change what you can’t measure."

And in doing so, Peele and her colleagues are using “very advanced techniques in machine learning,” she says, though she adds, “I don’t like the term ‘artificial intelligence.’” But, she notes, one exciting proect has been the use of a data model that “we’ve built with natural language processing and trained on our clinical care notes. It assigns the probability that somebody is homeless or has housing insecurity. And that’s incredibly important,” she notes. "If you’re homeless, how are you refrigerating your insulin?”

Meanwhile, “We’re still in the early stages of physicians and physician groups moving into social determinants of health data work,” APG’s Crane says. “If you talk to a fee-for-service doctor about social determinants of health, he’ll say, ‘Nice idea, but are you kidding? I didn’t go into healthcare to be a social worker.’ If you talk to APG members, though, you’ll see that they totally understand it.” Indeed, he says, more advanced medical groups, those taking on more risk, are trying to work forward, even as their leaders come quickly to see the challenges of connecting the data side of the SDoH phenomenon with the process side. “You so often need to get into the home, and into transportation, and nutritional support,” in order to make meaningful use of any data gathered for such purposes, Crane says. “If the patients can’t get to the doctor’s office, and aren’t eating and are living in a high-crime area, no amount of good diagnosis and prescription will produce a good outcome.”

Things are moving forward on multiple fronts, Crane notes. “In Medicare Advantage, given the latest rate note and the bipartisan Balanced Budget Act, Medicare is basically beginning to cover social determinants of health stuff; that’s in a nascent stage, but people are gearing up for it,” he says. “I think I saw that Humana and Ascension Health have created a new venture around social determinants. And we’ve entered into a partnership with Partners in Care, a foundation headquartered in Los Angeles. They’re available for hire to do home visits and other similar sorts of social work items. And my members are hiring them to do that kind of outreach into patient’s homes. It’s really helpful with the frail elderly and such. So seeing where the puck is headed there, we entered into a partnership with Partners in Care. And that’s a whole new frontier.”

Advice for Health I.T. Leaders

As the leaders of patient care organizations move their organizations further into risk-based contracts, inevitably, those interviewed for this article agree, the data analytics processes to support value-based care delivery will become more sophisticated, nuanced—and successful. In the meantime, what should the CIOs, CMIOs, and other healthcare IT leaders of patient care organizations, be thinking and doing, in this important area?

“Figuring out how to improve predictive modeling is one thing, and that means getting additional information that has predictive value,” says the AMGA’s Cuddeback. “And, in that context, everyone is recognizing that gathering social determinants of health information is important. For example, Lehigh Valley Health Network is actually working at the level of the census block group. Most of the socioeconomic measures are available from the Census Bureau at the census block group level, roughly 1,500 people. So if you actually know the resident’s address and are able to map it at that level—then you’re able to get the census data for that group of about 1,500 people,” for example. That granular level of data collection and analysis, he says, will be one key to moving forward successfully in the rapidly evolving world of risk-based contracting, he says.

Meanwhile, speaking of the foundational importance of data analytics to the entire value-based healthcare operations venture, APG’s Crane says bluntly, “There’s no future around fee-for-service; it’s eroding out from under doctors,” says Crane, whose association represents more than 300 physician groups operating in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. “You look at the Medicare fee schedule and increases slated for the future,” he says. “What are they? The anticipated increases to physician payment under Medicare are going to be 0.5 percent, 0.25 percent, from here out to as far as the eye can see, they’ll be nearly flat; and the increases in costs of running practices will be increasing 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 percent. So you’re quickly on the way to the poorhouse if you’re trying to stay in a fee-for-service world. So how will we make a living? To make a living doing what you want to do, you’re going to need to find a different way to make a profit under flat revenue. How do you do that? You keep the population healthier. You stare into the data and figure out who will get sick next, by using predictive analytics.”

See more on Analytics