CISOs, CIOs Not Confident in Their Medical Device Security Strategy, New KLAS Research Finds | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

CISOs, CIOs Not Confident in Their Medical Device Security Strategy, New KLAS Research Finds

October 9, 2018
by Heather Landi, Associate Editor
| Reprints
According to a survey of CIOs and CISOs, healthcare organizations have an average of 10,000 connected medical devices
Click To View Gallery

The healthcare industry continues to be bombarded with security attacks, and these cyber attacks are continuously evolving and become more sophisticated over time. At the same time, the healthcare ecosystem has become more connected with the increasing use of Internet of Things (IoT) medical devices, and these medical devices introduce vulnerabilities into healthcare organizations.

Unsecured and poorly secured medical devices put patients at risk of great harm if those devices are hacked, while also posing a threat to the security and privacy of patients’ protected health information (PHI). A recent medical device security report, the result of a collaborative effort between the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME), the Association for Executives in Healthcare Information Security (AEHIS), and the Orem, Utah-based KLAS Research, sheds light on the current state of the medical device security industry. For the report, KLAS interviewed 148 CIOs, chief information security officers (CISOs), chief technology officers (CTOs) and other professionals at provider organizations to gauge their level of confidence in their medical device security strategies, the most common challenges they face, their perceptions of the security and transparency of major medical device manufacturers, and the best practices they leverage to overcome medical device security challenges.

The author of the report, Dan Czech, director, market analysis, cybersecurity at KLAS Research, will provide an in-depth overview of this report and medical device security trends during Healthcare Informatics’ Seattle Health IT Summit Oct. 22-23 at the Grand Hyatt Seattle.

The sheer number of connected medical devices that the average healthcare provider is trying to manage speaks to the tremendous challenge IT security leaders face, says Czech. “We spoke to organizations ranging from small to mid-sized clinics all the way to large multi-hospital IDNs (integrated delivery networks), and everyone in between, and the average number of connected medical devices was just under 10,000 medical devices. You think of the enormity of that problem, for an organization to wrap their arms around the problem of managing 10,000 devices,” he says.

What’s more, respondents reported that, among the thousands of connected medical devices that their organizations are managing, about one-third (33 percent) of those devices are “unpatchable.”

Webinar

Components of Strong Cybersecurity Program - A Closer Look at Endpoint Security Best Practices

Endpoint protection remains a core security challenge for many healthcare organizations and it is more important than ever for healthcare organizations to actively manage their full range of...

According to the research, 18 percent of provider organizations had medical devices impacted by malware or ransomware in the last 18 months, although few of these incidents resulted in compromised PHI or an audit by the Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS OCR).

Czech notes that there have not been any patient safety events, to date, as a result of a medical device security issue; however, respondents cite patient safety as a top concern. “Let’s take an infusion pump,” he says. “The ability for a bad actor to gain access to that pump and change the dosage of the medication that’s being injected into a human, that is the kind of patient safety issue that we are concerned about.”

Czech continues, “Another way medical device security affects patient safety is if a device is on Windows XP, and WannaCry ransomware hits; if something like that happens, that device is taken out of production. You may have an oncology patient who needs consistent treatment with a medical device, and if you take that out of production, it disrupts patient care and impacts patient safety.”

The report found that most respondents are either neutral about or not confident in their current medical device security strategy, with CISOs and CIOs more likely to report concern. Only 39 percent of respondents said they were very confident or confident that their current strategy protects patient safety and prevents disruptions in care. Thirty-one percent said they were unconfident or very unconfident, and another 30 percent were neutral. About one-fifth of respondents feel that the inherent risks of medical devices—several of which are outside of their control—will prevent them from ever feeling confident.

Those healthcare leaders who expressed confidence most often point to their security processes and policies, including access limitations, network segmentation and regular device monitoring and risk assessment, as the source of their confidence, followed by strong technology. To support these processes and policies, many leverage security technologies, such as access controls, asset tracking, firewalls, and medical device monitoring. Strong executive support (financial and organizational) and cross-department collaboration also drive confidence, as evidenced by the fact that large IDNs, who more commonly have greater financial resources, are more likely to be confident in their strategies, according to the report.

“Respondents who report they are more confident also are those that have a clear line of ownership, not a shared responsibility,” Czech notes.

Those respondents that lacked confidence in their medical device security cited lack of manufacturer support as the top reason. Almost as common are internal issues related to basic—but hard-to-master—security tasks, such as understanding what assets exist in their organization, which have been patched, which are connected to their network, and what systems those devices are talking to. “Asset and inventory visibility is the basic blocking and tackling of medical device security strategy—you can’t protect what you don’t know. They are looking for tools and processes that they can put in place that will help them understand all the devices they have, what’s connected to their networks, and some cases, what software is on the devices” Czech says.

What’s more, 76 percent of provider organizations report that their resources are insufficient or too strained to adequately secure their medical devices.

More Manufacturer Support and Collaboration Needed

Taking a deep dive into the root causes of medical device security struggles, the report finds that interviewed organizations are almost unanimous in citing manufacturer-related factors as a cause of their medical device security issues. Most provider organization see this issue as one of shared responsibility. As one CISO explained in the report, “I think there needs to be a coordinated effort between the manufacturers, the provider sites, and the regulators. I wish there were some other way for us to address this issue, but without that three-way partnership, I just don’t see how things will work out.”

According to Czech, the research findings indicate there is a gap between how long organizations expect to be able to use a device and how long vendors feel they can keep a device up to date and secure. As a result, nearly all interviewed organizations (93 percent) have struggled with out-of-date operating systems or the inability to patch a device throughout its expected life cycle. Currently, many manufacturers do not allow customers to patch devices themselves, or void warranties if they do.

Insufficient security controls, insufficient encryption, and hardcoded passwords are each cited as manufacturer-caused issues by about half of respondents. Adding to provider organizations’ frustration, on average, almost one-third of medical device vendors decline to offer contract provisions favorable to security.

However, the industry is beginning to shift, Czech notes. "Many provider organizations have drawn a line in the sand to say all contracts now and going forward will include standardized security contract language," he says. "This trend has been led by forward-thinking provider organizations and it also has benefited smaller organizations that may not have the legal teams or the cybersecurity teams that bigger organizations have, but they can use that standardized language in their contracts as well."

What’s interesting, Czech notes, is that many respondents spontaneously brought up frustrations regarding the role of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in medical device security, though KLAS did not specifically ask respondents about it. “It gets back to shared responsibility,” he says. “Respondents feel that manufacturers have a stake in this, they have a stake in this, but so does the FDA. Predominantly, the concern that they shared was that their manufacturer would hide behind their perceptions of the FDA regulations."

Almost two-thirds of respondents said manufacturers blame FDA policies, claiming the policies prevent them from making devices more secure. About a third said FDA policies are unclear, giving manufacturers ways to skirt around responsibility and a third said that even when policies are clear, the FDA doesn’t hold manufacturers accountable, according to the report.

Cybersecurity Programs Advancing Forward

According to the research, organizations are increasingly adopting a number of best practices to strengthen medical device security. There are foundational best practices that organization should implement, such as performing risk assessments, ensuring the inclusion of security provisions in their contracts, and ensuring they receive a software bill of materials, Czech notes. Organizations also report using the most common and basic defense techniques such as network segmentation, antivirus software, and vulnerability scanning to ameliorate security risk.

With regards to organizations’ patching strategies, many provider organizations have begun requesting that vendors use contract language that clearly outlines patching responsibilities and timelines.

Providers also are leveraging third-party solutions to improve medical device security, with nearly 75 percent of respondents currently using or planning to use third-party software or services, according to the report. Network access control (NAC) is most often used to segment networks and approve/deny access. To reduce costs and clearly define ownership, other organizations outsource their clinical engineering as well.

Looking at overall cybersecurity trends, the report indicates that organizations are investing more resources, both operationally and financially, in their cybersecurity programs. Almost 70 percent of organizations (68 percent) report having a VP or C-level leader in charge of the security program, and that’s up from only 42 percent in 2017, representing a 26-percent increase.

“Large IDNs are definitely leading the way with CISO leadership, as about 80 percent of their organizations have a CISO in charge, whereas if you look at clinics and community hospitals, those would be hospitals under 200 beds, only less than 10 percent have a CISO in charge,” Czech says. “Many of those smaller organizations have a CIO that wears two hats—an IT hat and a security hat.”

Organizations also reported improvements to security programs compared to a year ago. Twenty-seven percent considered their security programs to be fully functional and 47 percent said they were developed or starting to function in 2018, compared to 16 percent and 41 percent, respectively, in 2017.   

More than half of organizations (57 percent) report that security is an agenda item at board meetings monthly or quarterly. In addition, 83 percent of organizations have increased their security budget in the last two years, and, on average, budgets increased by 85 percent, according to the report.

 


The Health IT Summits gather 250+ healthcare leaders in cities across the U.S. to present important new insights, collaborate on ideas, and to have a little fun - Find a Summit Near You!


/article/cybersecurity/cisos-cios-not-confident-their-medical-device-security-strategy-new-klas
/blogs/mark-hagland/cybersecurity/assessing-new-cybersecurity-practices-publication-why-small-and

Assessing the New Cybersecurity Practices Publication: Why Small and Medium-Sized Care Organizations Have Reason to Rejoice

| Reprints
A new set of voluntary cybersecurity practices just released by HHS offers practical advice and conceptual supports that fill information gaps
Click To View Gallery

How helpful will the new set of voluntary cybersecurity practices that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released in late December, be, to the leaders of patient care organizations? Only time will tell, as part of the value of the release will only be made manifest as the leaders of patient care organizations move forward to implement some of those practices, and the potential success of such implementations is in some way measured and benchmarked.

But the release is a first start, at least. As Healthcare Informatics Associate Editor Heather Landi reported on January 2, HHS released the set of practices in the form of a publication “that marks the culmination of a two-year effort that brought together over 150 cybersecurity and healthcare experts from industry and the government under the Healthcare and Public Health (HPH) Sector Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Public-Private Partnership.”

“Cybersecurity is everyone’s responsibility. It is the responsibility of every organization working in healthcare and public health.  In all of our efforts, we must recognize and leverage the value of partnerships among government and industry stakeholders to tackle the shared problems collaboratively,” Janet Vogel, HHS Acting Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), said in a statement published with the release of the new publication.

Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices: Managing Threats and Protecting Patients (HICP), the primary publication of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Section 405(d) Task Group, aims to raise awareness, provide vetted cybersecurity practices, and move organizations towards consistency in mitigating the current most pertinent cybersecurity threats to the sector,” HHS officials stated. “It seeks to aid healthcare and public health organizations to develop meaningful cybersecurity objectives and outcomes. The publication includes a main document, two technical volumes, and resources and templates.”

The overall publication consists of several sections, the first being the HICP, which “examines cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities that affect the healthcare industry. It explores five current threats and presents 10 practices to mitigate those threats; “Technical Volume 1: Cybersecurity Practices for Small Health Care Organizations,” which offers cybersecurity practices for small healthcare organizations; “Technical Volume 2: Cybersecurity Practices for Medium and Large Health Care Organizations”; the “Resources and Templates” portion, which “includes a variety of cybersecurity resources and templates for end users to reference”; and a Cybersecurity Practices Assessments Toolkit, which “helps organizations prioritize their cyber threats and develop their own action plans using the assessment methodology outlined in the Resources and Templates volume”—that last section being still under development as of Jan. 2.

As Landi reported, “The HICP publication aims to provide cybersecurity practices for this vast, diverse, and open sector to ultimately improve the security and safety of patients. The main document of the publication explores the five most relevant and current threats to the industry. It also recommends 10 cybersecurity practices to help mitigate these threats.”

What’s more, she wrote, “The main document presents real-life events and statistics that demonstrate the financial and patient care impacts of cyber incidents.  It also lays out a call to action for all industry stakeholders, from C-suite executives and healthcare practitioners to IT security professionals, that protective and preventive measures must be taken now. The publication also includes two technical volumes geared for IT and IT security professionals, one focusing on cybersecurity practices for small healthcare organizations, and one focused on practices for medium and large healthcare organizations.”

Among the salient statistics reported in the HICP:

  • Fifty-eight percent of malware attack victims are small businesses.
  • In 2017, cyber-attacks cost small and medium-sized businesses an average of $2.2 million.
  • Sixty of small businesses go out of business within six months of an attack.
  • And, 90 percent of small businesses do not use any data protection at all for company and customer information.

How does that translate into impacts on smaller healthcare organizations? Among other incidents, the HICP notes that:

  • A popular orthopedic practice announced that its computer system was hacked via breach of a software vendor’s log-in credentials. This breach put just under a half-million people at risk of identity theft. Of those, 500 patient profiles appeared for sale on the dark web. The information for sale included names, addresses, social security numbers, and other personally identifiable information (PII). Although not posted for sale, pertinent PHI such as X-ray results and medical diagnoses were also stolen.

 

  • A rural hospital had to replace its entire computer network after a ransomware cyber-attack froze the hospital’s electronic health record (EHR) system. Doctors were unable to review their patients’ medical histories or transmit laboratory and pharmacy orders. Officials were unable to restore essential services and could not pay the ransom for the return of their system. After consultations with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and cybersecurity experts, hospital officials made the difficult decision to replace the entire system.
  •  

Of particular practicality is some of the very basic advice given to the leaders of smaller healthcare organizations. To wit: “Doctors and nurses know that hand sanitizing is critical to prevent the spread of germs. That does not mean health care workers wash up as often as they should. Similarly, we know that cybersecurity practices reduce the risk of cyber-attacks and data breaches. Just as we are able to protect our patients from infection, we should all work towards protecting patient data to allow physicians and caregivers to trust the data and systems that enable quality health care. Just as health care professionals must wash their hands before caring for patients, health care organizations must practice good ‘cyber hygiene’ in today’s digital world, including it as a part of daily universal precautions,” the HICP notes. “Like the simple act of hand-washing, a culture of cyber-awareness does not have to be complicated or expensive for a small organization. It must simply be effective at enabling organization members to protect information that is critical to the organization’s patients and operations. Your organization’s vigilance against cyber-attacks will increase concurrently with your and your workforce’s knowledge of cybersecurity. This knowledge will enable you to advance to the next series of cybersecurity Practices, expanding your organization’s awareness of and ability to thwart cyber threats.”

Meanwhile, both smaller and larger patient care organizations will benefit from the technical supports, including a Security Risk Assessment Tool, a set of recommendations on medical devices and cybersecurity, and an incident response risk management handbook.

What this set of resources does is to fill a gap between theory and technical practice in a key area. Will it shift the entire landscape of cybersecurity for patient care organizations? No, that would be a far-too-ambitious goal. But the healthcare IT leaders of smaller and medium-sized patient care organizations in particular, will welcome practice advice and supports, as they move forward in their journeys around cybersecurity. Any such journey is inherently challenging, and federal publications and resources like these will be of real value in moving patient care organization HIT leaders forward.

 

 

More From Healthcare Informatics

/news-item/cybersecurity/hhs-releases-voluntary-healthcare-cybersecurity-practices

HHS Releases Voluntary Healthcare Cybersecurity Practices

January 2, 2019
by Heather Landi, Associate Editor
| Reprints

In late December, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released voluntary cybersecurity practices to the healthcare industry with the aim of providing practice guidelines to cost-effectively reduce cybersecurity risks.

The “Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices (HICP): Managing Threats and Protecting Patients” publication aims to provide guidance to healthcare organizations of all types and sizes, ranging from local clinics to large hospital systems.

The industry-led effort was in response to a mandate set forth by the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 Section 405(d), to develop practical cybersecurity guidelines to cost-effectively reduce cybersecurity risks for the healthcare industry.

According to HHS, the publication marks the culmination of a two-year effort that brought together over 150 cybersecurity and healthcare experts from industry and the government under the Healthcare and Public Health (HPH) Sector Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Public-Private Partnership.

“Cybersecurity is everyone’s responsibility. It is the responsibility of every organization working in healthcare and public health.  In all of our efforts, we must recognize and leverage the value of partnerships among government and industry stakeholders to tackle the shared problems collaboratively,” Janet Vogel, HHS Acting Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), said in a statement.

While technologies are vital to the healthcare industry and help provide life-saving treatments and improve patient care, these same technologies are vulnerable to myriad attacks from adversaries, ranging from criminals and hacktivists to nation-states, according to HHS. These technologies can be exploited to gain access to personal patient data or render entire hospital systems inoperable. Recent cyber-attacks against the nation’s healthcare industry continue to highlight the importance of ensuring these technologies are safe and secure.

“The healthcare industry is truly a varied digital ecosystem. We heard loud and clear through this process that providers need actionable and practical advice, tailored to their needs, to manage modern cyber threats. That is exactly what this resource delivers; recommendations stratified by the size of the organization, written for both the clinician as well as the IT subject matter expert,” Erik Decker, industry co-lead and Chief Information Security and Privacy Officer for the University of Chicago Medicine, said in a statement.

The HICP publication aims to provide cybersecurity practices for this vast, diverse, and open sector to ultimately improve the security and safety of patients. The main document of the publication explores the five most relevant and current threats to the industry. It also recommends 10 cybersecurity practices to help mitigate these threats.

The main document presents real-life events and statistics that demonstrate the financial and patient care impacts of cyber incidents.  It also lays out a call to action for all industry stakeholders, from C-suite executives and healthcare practitioners to IT security professionals, that protective and preventive measures must be taken now. The publication also includes two technical volumes geared for IT and IT security professionals, one focusing on cybersecurity practices for small healthcare organizations, and one focused on practices for medium and large healthcare organizations.

 

Related Insights For: Cybersecurity

/news-item/cybersecurity/cynergistek-protenus-partner-privacy-monitoring-programs

CynergisTek, Protenus Partner on Privacy Monitoring Programs

December 26, 2018
by Heather Landi, Associate Editor
| Reprints

CynergisTek, Inc., an Austin, Texas-based healthcare cybersecurity firm, is partnering with Protenus, a healthcare compliance analytics company, to combine the companies’ technology tools and services with a focus on patient privacy monitoring programs.

The partnership will grant health systems access to Protenus’ analytics platform that leverages artificial intelligence to gather data related to potential patient privacy risks, along with CynergisTek’s patient privacy monitoring services.

According to the Protenus research, insider incidents accounted for 23 percent of all breaches that occurred at health systems in Q3 2018. This figure will only continue increasing, indicating that now more than ever, health systems need a cost-effective solution to meet the daily challenges of managing patient privacy.

To address this need, CynergisTek and Protenus formed a preferred partnership to combine CynergisTek’s healthcare consulting experience and privacy programs with Protenus’ healthcare analytics technology to offer health systems both the people, processes, and technology components of a strong patient privacy monitoring program, according to the companies.

“As health systems face mounting challenges in creating and maintaining robust patient privacy monitoring programs, we identified a need to partner with a company offering complementary services so that health systems can act on the insights uncovered by our analytics,” Nick Culbertson, CEO and co-founder of Protenus, said in a statement.

 “Data privacy is evolving as a dominate theme in conversations, both in healthcare and other industries, and health systems need to take an end-to-end approach to patient privacy to truly address this complex and mission-critical challenge,” Mac McMillan, CEO and president of CynergisTek, said in a statement.

 

See more on Cybersecurity

agario agario---betebet sohbet hattı betebet bahis siteleringsbahis