In New York, Statewide HIE Re-examining Consent Model | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

In New York, Statewide HIE Re-examining Consent Model

April 17, 2017
by David Raths
| Reprints
Click To View Gallery

A white paper published this year by the New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) proposes that the Statewide Health Information Network for New York (SHIN-NY) consider broadening its consent policy to enable care coordination, quality improvement, and other population health efforts.

One of the key principles agreed upon in the development of SHIN-NY almost a decade ago was that, subject to limited exceptions, patient information maintained by a regional health information organization (RHIO) can be accessed by a RHIO participant only if the patient signs a written consent form authorizing such access. In 2016 NYEC surveyed RHIO and conducted a series of focused interviews about the impact of the consent policy. Among its findings were:

• A substantial majority of SHIN-NY participants (75 percent) believe that, from a policy standpoint, the current consent model strikes the appropriate balance between facilitating clinical information sharing and protecting patient privacy. In practice, however, many participants experience workflow problems associated with obtaining patient consent that impede the flow of health information for important clinical purposes.

• Many participants primarily use the SHIN-NY to access the results of laboratory, radiology, and other tests they have ordered. In these cases, the current consent model does not serve as a barrier because participants can rely on the patient’s implicit consent for these “one-to-one exchanges” and are not required to obtain a formal written SHIN-NY consent. In contrast, participants that seek to pull a comprehensive history of a patient’s medical care from a RHIO face more significant impediments to obtaining consent, especially if they want to access the patient’s records in advance of an initial visit.

• Care coordination, quality improvement, and other population health efforts face the greatest barriers because participants are seeking to obtain information from a broad class of patients, many of whom rarely engage with the healthcare system and are unlikely to have signed a SHIN-NY consent form.

It appears that the greatest obstacles created by the current consent model arise in connection with population health activities conducted by insurers, individual providers, or multi-provider ventures such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). In these use cases, the healthcare  organization  often  seeks  to  pull  comprehensive  data about a large cohort of patients to identify those who may be underutilizing the healthcare system or otherwise receiving sub-optimal care. Since many of these patients are disengaged from the system, it is often difficult to obtain their consent.

There is a strong interest among many providers in receiving “alerts” from the SHIN-NY about important clinical events involving their patients, such as an emergency room visit or an admission to the hospital. The current consent model restricts the ability of providers to    receive alerts in cases where an event triggering an alert occurs prior to a patient visit with the provider seeking access to such alert.

• Technological challenges also complicate the process of obtaining consent. For example, in many hospitals the registrar responsible for collecting consent forms does not have access to the RHIO system to determine whether a patient has previously granted consent to the hospital. This limitation results in duplicative consent requests. The lack of an easily accessible central registry to track consents undermines the efforts of RHIOs to utilize a RHIO-wide consent model under which one participant can obtain consent on behalf of all other participants.

• Patients typically lack familiarity with RHIOs and the SHIN-NY, and are not likely to have a good understanding of the significance of granting or denying consent.

The NYeC identified three primary alternatives to the current consent model for further consideration:

• SHIN-NY Wide Consent Model: This model requires the patient to sign a written SHIN-NY consent, but it differs from the current model by allowing patients to sign a single consent form that covers all participants in the SHIN-NY, not just a single participant or all participants in a given RHIO. Under this model, the consent form would not have to list all SHIN-NY participants, but instead, could refer patients to a website where they could view such a list as it changes from time to time.    

• Opt-Out Model: Under this model, a patient’s information could be exchanged for all purposes permitted by HIPAA and any other applicable federal laws unless the patient signs a form requesting to opt out of such exchanges. Patients would be notified of their opt-out rights through various means.

• Flexible Consent Model: Currently, only a SHIN-NY-specific written consent is sufficient to authorize access to information through the SHIN-NY. Under a flexible consent model, any consent that covers the purposes for which information will be  accessed  through  the  SHIN-NY  would  qualify  as  a  valid  SHIN-NY  consent. For example, the broad consent signed by all Medicaid beneficiaries as part of the State’s Medicaid enrollment application would be adequate to permit the exchange of their information through the SHIN-NY for the purposes described in that consent.


Get the latest information on Health IT and attend other valuable sessions at this two-day Summit providing healthcare leaders with educational content, insightful debate and dialogue on the future of healthcare and technology.

Learn More