Stark Choices | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology Skip to content Skip to navigation

Stark Choices

May 1, 2006
by Gregg Reisman, Esq. & Peter Mancino, Esq.
| Reprints
DHHS has proposed safe harbors that would allow hospitals and other entities to provide more funds to technology-hungry physicians.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has released two sets of proposed regulations regarding electronic prescribing and electronic health records (EHRs). If finalized and adopted, these regulations will offer protections to hospitals and physician practices that donate EHR technology and related services to other providers.

Although the technology is currently available, hospitals and other entities have been slow to provide EHR systems to their medical staff because of concerns surrounding fraud and abuse laws. These new regulations are an attempt by DHHS to encourage providers to use EHRs.

Providing free software, hardware and training to doctors and others to implement EHR systems could run counter to the federal anti-kickback statute which prohibits the giving of anything of value to a referral source to induce patient referrals. In addition, there is the possibility that the Federal Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark) — which prohibits physicians from making referrals for certain Medicare or Medicaid services to an entity with which they (or an immediate family member) have a financial relationship — could be violated if the entity that receives referrals (e.g., a hospital) donates technology to a physician.

As mandated by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), DHHS' Office of Inspector General has proposed a safe harbor to the anti-kickback statute that would protect certain arrangements involving hospitals, group practices, and certain other entities that provide hardware, software, training or other services necessary to receive and transmit e-prescribing drug information.

In addition, although not yet drafted, the Office of Inspector General has published its intention to adopt another set of rules for the provision of EHR technology. At the same time, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published proposed exceptions to the Stark law for the provision of both e-prescribing and EHR technology.Gregg reisman, esq.Peter mancino, esq.


To qualify for protection under the safe harbor and Stark exception, hospitals and physician practices that wish to provide e-prescribing technology will have to meet specific requirements pertaining to:

The participants in the arrangement — As presently drafted, the proposed safe harbor and Stark exception provide that hospitals would only be permitted to donate items or services to physicians on their medical staffs. The safe harbor permits group practices to donate to their group members (owners and employees) who are prescribing professionals (e.g., nurse practitioners). Because the Stark law only pertains to physicians, the exception for group practices would only apply to member physicians.

The scope of the technology — The items or services donated must be "necessary" to conduct e-prescription transactions (e.g., hardware, software, Internet connectivity, training, support services) and "used solely" for the transmission or receipt of e-prescribing information.

Certification — Recipients would be required to attest in writing that the items or services received are not technically or functionally equivalent to items or services already possessed. Moreover, to qualify for protection, the donor must not have actual knowledge of nor act in reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance of the fact that the recipient already possesses items or services equivalent to those donated. It is unclear, however, how far a donor must go to ascertain whether the recipient has functionally equivalent items.

Compatibility and Interoperability — The regulations would prohibit donors from taking any action to disable or limit the interoperability of e-prescribing technology or from otherwise imposing barriers to compatibility with other e-prescribing items, services or systems.

Value of Protected Technology — To minimize the potential for fraud and abuse, the aggregate monetary value of the e-prescribing technology that a donor could provide would be limited. However, the methodology to be used to determine such a cap has not been decided.

Other conditions — DHHS' proposed regulations would prohibit recipients from making the donation of e-prescribing technology a condition of doing business with the donor; and donors from taking into account the volume or value of the recipients' referrals to the donor or other business generated between the parties in determining the eligibility of a recipient. In addition, all agreements to provide e-prescribing technology must be in writing, signed by the parties and identify with specificity the items or services provided and their values.


DHHS believes that the provision of EHR technology to physicians poses a greater risk of fraud and abuse than the provision of e-prescribing technology because it is "inherently more valuable to physicians in terms of actual cost, avoided overhead and administrative expenses of an office practice." However, adoption of such technology is vital to a system that will allow health information to move from one point of care to another in a way that will satisfy patient concerns regarding confidentiality and security.

Both the Office of Inspector General and CMS expect to adopt an incremental approach in this area proposing "pre-" and "post-interoperability" regulations that will depend on DHHS' adoption of product certification criteria, including criteria for interoperability, functionality, privacy and security. During the "pre-interoperability" phase, CMS proposes to only protect software that is essential to and used solely for the transmission, receipt or maintenance of patients' EHRs and that has an e-prescribing component. In the "post-operability" phase, CMS would expand the scope of donated software as long as the core function remains e-prescribing and EHR.

Because of the importance and complexity of applying electronic information technology to the field of healthcare, the proposed regulations are certain to generate a large number of public comments and revisions to the safe harbor and Stark exception are assured. Thus, it is impossible to predict when these important regulations will become final.

Author Information:

Gregg Reisman and Peter Mancino are partners at Garfunkel, Wild & Travis P.C., a law firm in Great Neck, N.Y.

The Health IT Summits gather 250+ healthcare leaders in cities across the U.S. to present important new insights, collaborate on ideas, and to have a little fun - Find a Summit Near You!


See more on

betebet sohbet hattı betebet bahis siteleringsbahis