Best HITECH Strategy? Rush In or Watch & Wait | [node:field-byline] | Healthcare Blogs Skip to content Skip to navigation

Best HITECH Strategy? Rush In or Watch & Wait

April 21, 2009
by flpoggio
| Reprints

How did we get into this economic mess? The partial answer is people borrowed money on terms they did not comprehend, or terms that were not fully disclosed. Then a couple of years later one fundamental rule changed — housing values, it appears, can go up and down, and yes Virginia, you can lose big money in real estate.

So now hospitals under the new American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) are being given the same wonderful opportunity. Borrow money from your rich (but debt ridden) Uncle to buy a shinny new EMR and agree that he can define the interest and repayment terms when he gets around to it. The recent HIMSS conference was replete with sessions telling you; Get the money now, buy a system soon, you don’t want to get hit with a penalty in 2015, and make sure you get your piece of the pie.

So like lemmings to the ledge we run.


When the rest of the world is yelling at you to jump with the lemmings, why wait?

There are at least three big reasons.

1) When was the last time you saw ‘on time’ regulation?

I have worked the healthcare industry for 35 years and cannot remember one major piece of legislation that met its original target dates. I lived through TEFRA, DRGs, HIPPA, UB-82, ICD10 and dozens of others. Not one made the original and, in many cases, second target dates. Amtrak has a better on-time schedule. What makes us think ARRA will be any different? I’ll bet my reputation that all the dates get pushed out, probably by years.

2) Meaningful what?

Nobody knows and the committee will decide. So what happens after you sign on the dotted line and two years later you learn the system cannot support all the meaningful use measures the committee came up with? I know what you’re thinking. Sue the ### vendor!

But that assumes the vendor allowed a clause in the contract warranting performance for all ‘meaningful use criteria.’ And that clause will no doubt go on for pages, since there could be cases where the system has the tools to support meaningful use, but it doesn’t fit with your workflow, and staff is not willing to deploy it.

Under Sarbanes Oxley, vendors that are public companies cannot book any revenues on contracts with open-ended contingencies. Getting a vendor to sign on that dotted line will be a super major task. Private companies like Epic and Meditech don’t have to worry about quarterly revenue pressure so they may be more willing. But still they could be taking on significant product liabilities. This one will be a big revenue generator for the lawyers.

3) The feds giveth, and the feds taketh away, or there is no such thing as a free lunch.

We get $20 billion for IT on Monday, and in that same week, on Thursday, President Obama announces he intends to cut the healthcare budget by $160 billion. So he expects an eight-to-one ROI. Not a bad investment. When was the last time your information system generated that kind of return in three years?

As a former hospital CFO, I would at least hesitate to jump at the chance to lay out $10 million for a new system, when I know over the next three years my Medicare /Medicaid payments are going to be cut by $80 million? Do you know of an EMR vendor that will guarantee you an eight-to-one ROI?

Which strategy, what risks – run the numbers.

1) Strategy 1: Jump now.

Say you’re a 250-bed community hospital and you commit $5 or $10 million now on an EMR hoping to get paid later and avoid ARRA penalties in 2015. If you have a 50 percent Medicare population, the potential penalty is a ¾ point reduction in your Medicare market basket index for that year. So if it comes in at 2 percent (it hasn’t gone over 3 percent in years, and can get as low as .5 percent) that means your increase in Medicare dollars will drop from about $900,000 to $675,000.

What’s the upside of jumping now?

- You avoid a $225,000 Medicare cut in 2015.

What the downside risks?

a) A bad investment of $5 million because they changed the rules, or you signed up with the wrong vendor.

b) Trying to force a system in will taint all future IT attempts and can shorten the life span of any CIO.

c) Legal and other costs to sue the vendor.

d) The pain of having to change out the system again.

2) Strategy 2: Go to the ledge, hold on and just look down.

This is a buy time strategy. You wait for another year to see how the regulations shake out. You start a process now, but take your time and do it right. Your betting the dates will get pushed out and, as noted earlier, history is on your side.

What are the downside risks?

a) Dates hold and you must incur reduced Medicare payments of $225,000.

b) Worst case you are another year late and it costs you about $450,000.

What’s the upside?

a) You have a solid system with user buy in and it meets the meaningful use criteria.

b) You haven’t turned the hospital upside down to force a system in.

c) You save a bunch on legal fees – probably equal to that same $225k you lost from Medicare.

d) You should easily recoup the $225,000 loss from taking the time to select a system that does more than just meet meaningful use and really works in your environment.

Now remember, it was only a few years back that your rich Uncle was giving away truck loads of money through Fannie and Freddie. Look what trouble that got us into. Maybe before we fill our wallets with Fed money again we should take some time to get a better fix on what could go wrong and strive to minimize the downside.

Frank Poggio

President

The Kelzon Group


The Health IT Summits gather 250+ healthcare leaders in cities across the U.S. to present important new insights, collaborate on ideas, and to have a little fun - Find a Summit Near You!


/blogs/flpoggio/best-hitech-strategy-rush-or-watch-wait

See more on

betebettipobetngsbahis